Now That You've Spent Some Time Writing Down Some Potential

Now That Youve Spent Some Time Writing Down Some Potential Problems F

Now that you've spent some time writing down some potential problems for your project, it's time to narrow the focus. Reviewing your brainstorming activity, select two potential problems that 1) have two logical sides to the issue (your viewpoint and an opposing viewpoint), 2) are researchable, and 3) are related to your career or degree. In your journal, write a fully developed paragraph for each problem (5-8 sentences each) explaining two sides to the issue (how is it argumentative?), how you plan to approach it in your project (what side are you going to take?), and why you're personally interested in it (of all the potential problems in your field or degree, why did you choose this?). When writing the paragraphs, feel free to express any other thoughts or concerns you may have about the topic choices.

After exploring the argumentativeness of your problems, take a moment to consider the bigger picture. Then, in one to two paragraphs, briefly reflect on the importance of persuasion with the potential topic you're most likely to write about. Why is it important that people consider your side with your selected topic? Who is your audience, and why is it important to convince them that your view on your topic is the better (or more correct) view? Remember to try to be specific in your entry: this information will help guide you as you work on your project in the coming weeks.

Paper For Above instruction

In my reflection on potential research problems related to my field of education, I've identified two key issues that exhibit clear argumentative perspectives and are highly relevant to my career goals. The first problem concerns the implementation of standardized testing in elementary education. On one side, proponents argue that standardized tests provide objective measures of student achievement, facilitate accountability, and allow for comparisons across schools and districts. Opponents, however, contend that such testing narrows curriculum focus, encourages teaching to the test, and neglects critical thinking and creativity. I plan to approach this issue by advocating for a balanced assessment system that integrates both standardized measures and formative assessments. My personal interest in this topic stems from my desire to improve educational practices that genuinely support student growth rather than merely upward accountability metrics, as I believe education should foster holistic development.

The second problem I am considering is the integration of technology in the classroom, particularly the use of tablets and laptops for instruction. One side argues that technology enhances engagement, allows access to diverse resources, and prepares students for a digital future. Conversely, critics warn that overreliance on technology can lead to distractions, diminish interpersonal skills, and exacerbate educational inequalities. My approach will focus on advocating for thoughtful, purposeful integration of technology that complements traditional teaching methods. I am interested in this topic because I see technology as an essential tool that can revolutionize education but recognize the importance of balanced use to avoid downsides. Personally, I am eager to explore how to optimize technology's benefits in education while mitigating its risks, aiming to contribute strategies that educators can implement.

Persuasion plays a vital role in influencing educational policy and classroom practices, especially concerning standardized testing and technology integration. It's important that stakeholders—teachers, administrators, policymakers, and parents—consider my viewpoints because these issues directly impact student learning experiences and outcomes. Convincing them that a balanced, evidence-based approach is best encourages responsible decision-making that prioritizes student growth and equity. My audience includes educators and decision-makers who have the power to influence curriculum design and assessment strategies; therefore, it’s crucial to present compelling, research-supported arguments that demonstrate the advantages of a nuanced approach. Effective persuasion ensures these key stakeholders recognize the value of innovative yet balanced educational practices that can foster better learning environments for all students.

References

1. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. Teachers College Press.
2. Amrein-Beardsley, A. (2008). The Pythagorean theorem of high-stakes testing: Proficiency, accountability, and the myth of the perfect test. Teachers College Record, 110(9), 1901–1934.
3. Warschauer, M. (2007). Technology and equity in schooling. Teachers College Record, 109(3), 695–714.
4. Heitin, L. (2019). The future of classroom tech in education. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/technology
5. National Education Association. (2014). Digital Learning: Moving from policy to practice. NEA Publications.
6. Hehir, T., & Schifter, L. (2014). Inclusive education: Strategies for including all students in the general education classroom. Pearson.
7. Figlio, D., & Winberger, E. (2005). The effects of assessment on teacher effort. Journal of Public Economics, 89(3), 489–504.
8. Chingos, M. M., & Herman, J. L. (2018). The role and influence of testing in American education. Policy Report. Urban Institute.
9. Rivkin, S. G., & Hanushek, E. A. (2006). Education policy and the effectiveness of teachers. Education Economics, 14(4), 385–410.
10. Kallick, B., & Colosimo, J. (2016). Technology integration in classrooms: Opportunities and challenges. ASCD.