NR449 RUA: Analyzing Published Research Guidelines ✓ Solved
NR449 RUA: Analyzing Published Research Guidelines
1. Describe the problem: What is the focus of your group’s work?
2. Significance of problem: What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations.
3. Purpose of the paper: What will your paper do or describe?
4. Evidence Matrix Table: Data Summary (Appendix A) Required criteria Categorize items in the Matrix Table, including proper in-text citations and reference list entries for each article.
5. References (recent publication within the last 5 years)
6. Purpose/Hypothesis/Study Question(s)
7. Variables: Independent (I) and Dependent (D)
8. Study Design
9. Sample Size and Selection
10. Data Collection Methods
11. Major Findings (Evidence)
12. Describe the data in the Matrix Table, including proper in-text citations and reference list entries for each article.
13. Compare and contrast variables within each study.
14. What are the study design and procedures used in each study; qualitative, quantitative, or mixed method study, levels of confidence in each study, etc.?
15. Participant demographics and information.
16. Instruments used, including reliability and validity.
17. How do the research findings provide evidence to support your clinical problem, or what further evidence is needed to answer your question?
18. Next steps: Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work.
19. Review major findings in a summary paragraph.
20. Evidence to address your clinical problem.
21. Make a connection back to all the included sections.
22. Wrap up the assignment and give the reader something to think about.
23. Correct grammar and spelling
24. Include a title and reference page
25. Use of headings for each section: Problem, Synthesis of the Literature, Variables, Methods, Participants, Instruments, Implications for Future Work, Conclusion
26. Adhere to current APA formatting and guidelines
27. Include at least two (2) scholarly, current (within 5 years) primary sources other than the textbook
28. 3-4 pages in length excluding appendices, title and reference pages
The purpose of this paper is to interpret two significant articles that relate to our clinical question. The chosen articles will be summarized through an evidence matrix table that captures critical information about each study. The discussions will focus on the significance of the problem being addressed, the findings of the studies analyzed, and the implications for this research in the field of nursing.
Clinical Question
In our group work, the main focus is understanding the impact of educational interventions on diabetes management. Diabetes is a prevalent chronic condition affecting millions worldwide, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Statistics show that approximately 463 million adults were living with diabetes in 2019, and this number is expected to rise to 700 million by 2045 (International Diabetes Federation, 2019). This stark reality illustrates the need for effective management strategies, specifically through educational support programs.
Evidence Matrix Table
| Article References | Purpose | Hypothesis/Study Question(s) | Variables | Study Design | Sample Size & Selection | Data Collection Methods | Major Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smith, L. (2013). What should I eat? A focus for those living with diabetes. Journal of Nursing Education. | To evaluate the effect of educational support on dietary management in diabetes. | How do educational support groups affect dietary modifications in patients with diabetes? | Independent (I) - Education; Dependent (D) - Dietary modifications | Quantitative | 18 - Convenience sample from local support groups in Pittsburgh, PA | Focus Groups | Support and education improved compliance with dietary modifications. |
Description of Findings
The evidence matrix table summarizes the critical aspects of each study, such as purpose, variables, and findings. In our analysis, we will compare and contrast the independent and dependent variables across the studies, providing a holistic view of the evidence. For instance, the Smith (2013) study emphasizes the significant impact of educational interventions on dietary compliance, showcasing the benefits of structured support groups.
Additionally, the study designs vary but largely encompass quantitative methodologies that lend themselves to replicability and reliability. For instance, the study by Smith (2013) utilized a convenience sample, which, while yielding valuable insights, is limited by its potential biases. Demographics reveal a focus on adult participants, primarily those already engaged with diabetes-related support services, which suggests a targeted approach in identifying subjects most likely to benefit from educational interventions.
Instruments used must demonstrate reliability and validity to ensure the findings can be trusted. Future research should critically evaluate these instruments, ensuring they adequately reflect the outcomes of interest and the patient population.
The implications of the findings suggest a need for healthcare systems to invest in educational programs focused on self-management skills, which have shown to improve health outcomes in patients with diabetes. In the context of furthering research, two pertinent guiding questions emerge: “What role do socio-economic factors play in accessing diabetic education programs?” and “How can digital platforms enhance patient education and engagement in diabetes management?”
Conclusion
In summarizing the major findings, the evidence supports the premise that educational interventions are critical for effective diabetes management. The articles stress the need for continuous support aimed at dietary adherence through structured educational programs. These findings link back to our initial discussions about the significance of our clinical problem, emphasizing a strong connection within the researched studies.
In wrapping up this analysis, it’s vital for future research to focus on innovative ways to deliver education, ensuring that comprehensive approaches are employed to reach diverse populations managing diabetes effectively. The insights garnered throughout this paper provide a foundation for further developing intervention strategies that empower patients towards better health outcomes.
References
- International Diabetes Federation. (2019). IDF Diabetes Atlas (9th ed.). Brussels, Belgium.
- Smith, L. (2013). What should I eat? A focus for those living with diabetes. Journal of Nursing Education.