Number The Pages In MLA Format: People Between Security And

Number The Pages Mla Formatpeople Between Security And Privacyinvest

Number the pages, MLA format, People Between Security and Privacy Investigation Discovery (ID) is an American television network owned by Discovery Communications that features documentary-style programming dealing with true crime subjects, mostly those of a violent nature (primarily homicides, but also kidnappings, stalking, sexual assaults, domestic violence and disappearances) (1). If you start watching this TV show, you would understand how necessary security is. You would believe that giving up the right to privacy is really nothing compared to the right to security. You would think about How every single detail can help the government to control crimes and fight disasters. "Investigation Discovery - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia." Insert Name of Site in Italics. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Oct. 2015 Public safety or security is a governmental responsibility that has the primary goal of protecting and keeping the public safe. Countries can have security department as a part of the government. Also, colleges, universities, and large organizations can have safety divisions. Since we live in an enormous society, some people believe that privacy is essential for quality of life and the need of security presents a massive threat to the personal privacy. On the other hand, I believe that the need of security is paramount and should exceed our anxieties about privacy. To begin with, security requires a certain degree of government monitoring. Giving up the right to privacy at certain level assists the government to fight crimes and catch criminals, which in turn will yield to a safe living environment. The National Crime Information Center (NCIC) for example was launched to create and provide a database for easy access by criminal justice agency conducting an inquiry and for immediate disclosure of information in the system from other criminal justice agency about crimes and criminals. The intention of creating such a database and having records of millions of people is good that it aids authorized agencies in criminal justice and related law enforcement objective like locating missing persons, locating stolen property or apprehending fugitives. In this way, police officers will be more capable to function well and decrease the rate of crimes in the society by fighting crimes, catching criminals right in the scene, and then punishing them. As result, our society would be calmer and secure allowing us and our children to live peacefully in a safe atmosphere. Therefore, giving up the right to our privacy is giving us the right to our security. Are video surveillance and cameras in public places a good idea? This question published in the Debate org website, and according to the public answer, it has been shown that 62% of the public said “Yes” and 38% said “No”. “people who said No” it is an infringement on your civil liberties/Privacy Is Dead "Those who give up liberty for safety deserve neither" - Benjamin Franklin /It takes away our freedom to not be watched./people need to be respected. We don't deserve to be watched while living our lives./it's an infringement on our rights the crime is never stopped by this system/Hello, don't I have a right to go to a park without being filmed? Privacy is privacy. I don't have to sit at home all day, because I'm worried about being filmed. Yes, it would help with the issue of crime, but is it really that worth it. The main reason I think this issue is suddenly becoming so big is because of the Boston Marathon. Yes, it's a HUGE tragedy, but there is no proof that more cameras could have prevented it. Also, think about the cost. WE DON'T HAVE MONEY FOR THAT! On the other hand, they don't work. In New York a man got stabbed and was left to die in front of three surveillance cameras. It took the ambulances 2 hours to get to the injured man, and he died before getting to the hospital. The surveillance cameras did nothing to help the man, and are a waste of tax payers money. But in return, I believe that video surveillance and cameras at public places like malls, red-light, freeways, hospitals, and airports assist in reducing disasters, maintaining the public safety in general and increasing customer’s protection in particular. First of all, large and crowded places such as shopping malls are susceptive to criminal activity and highly frequent target of theft, crime, violence and other incidents. All parts of a shopping complex including shops, restaurants, movie theaters, storages and along with elevators and parking garage present an enormous and unique challenges for security personnel. Therefore, security cameras system in places such as marketplace aids to heighten security by providing unlimited monitoring of all mall areas and then spot suspicious activity such as kidnappings, fights, car stealing and violent outbursts allowing malls securities to take serious action and deploy police if need-be. So, we should enjoy shopping rather than worry about who’s monitoring us. Because these cameras used in needed in case of crime. Second, security cameras at hospitals positioned throughout healthcare facilities might violate patient and employee’s privacy, but they are necessary. This security system is an efficient tool to the security plan at hospitals. It can assist to monitor for unauthorized visitors in restricted areas. Monitoring cameras also allow doctors and nurses to watch for a troubled patient and avoid deadly consequences. Additionally, it helps to prevent crimes such as theft of medication and child and infant abduction. In April 2012, for example, a 30-year-old Texas woman shot and killed a 28-year-old mother while kidnapping her 3-day-old son from a pediatric center. The infant was recovered successfully six hours later due to the heightened hospital security. Furthermore, the red-light and highways safety cameras can contribute to reducing dangerous intersection crashes that typically cause injury and death. Without this kind of monitoring, people lives would be more likely in danger by reckless and irresponsible drivers. According to “The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety in Fairfax, Virginia, and Oxnard, CA" Injury crashes at intersections with traffic signals were reduced 29%. ("Study finds red light cameras cut crashes - IIHS-HLDI: Crash ..." Insert Name of Site in Italics. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Oct. 2015) Another fact, Front-into-side collisions — the crash type most closely associated with red light running — were reduced 32 %, and front-into-side crashes involving injuries were reduced 68 %. (Red light running - IIHS, (accessed October 30, 2015). Eventually, security system at airports is highly needed. It plays an effective role in foiling terrorist operation that target the homeland safety or security. This intensive safety system including full-body scanners should make passengers feel more secure and safe rather that make them feel worried about their privacy. The body scanner at airports might harm our privacy but it helps reveal hidden weapons and makes terrorist attacks more difficult. We need to understand that the government work for us not against us. When it comes to matter to national security, and when it comes to stopping terrorists who want to commit crimes such as a blowing up airplanes, the need of security should exceed our concern about privacy. In conclusion, some people believe that the need of protection against their right of privacy and presents a big threat to the personal confidentiality. While other people see that the necessity of security is expected for secure and safe life, and it should override concerns about privacy. In my point of view, privacy and security are both important, but when the balance between both of them has been found where security has greater value, I highly agree with the second part. The appearance of cameras and video surveillance on the street and public places keeps an eye out of criminals and thieves, improves the overall level of security, and gives the public the confidence that unwelcomed behavior won’t be tolerated. So, it is worth it to overlook our right to privacy. Do you agree that the need for security is threatening our right to privacy? Or do you think the need for security is paramount and must ultimately override concerns about privacy? Why or why not? Be ready to qualify your position by collecting information from sources, considering opinions of others, and relying on your personal experiences and observations. Guidelines: Your introduction will present the issue and state the essay’s thesis. See that the thesis includes a claim (an assertion, possibly with a word “should”) and the reasons (of value or cause) that support the claim and are logically connected to it. The body of your argument will: (a) provide logical support for each reason stated in the thesis by using · appeals to authority · facts and figures · opinion statements · examples · personal experience (b) summarize the position of those who would oppose this argument and respond to the opposition point of view by either refuting it or conceding to it. In your conclusion, place the argument in a larger context, perhaps by summarizing your main points and showing why this issue is an important one or by calling to action.