Nursing Research Week 14 Read A Qualitative Nursing Study
Nursing Research Wk 14read A Qualitative Nursing Study1 If A Differe
Nursing Research WK 14 Read a qualitative nursing study. 1) If a different investigator had gone into the field to study the same problem, how likely is it that the conclusions would have been the same? 2) How transferable are the research's findings? INSTRUCTIONS: APA FORMAT Minimum 3 Paragraphs with 3 Sentences for each question IN TEXT CITATIONS WITH MINIMUM 2 PEER REFERENCES NO LESS THAN 5 YRS
Paper For Above instruction
The likelihood of obtaining the same conclusions if a different investigator conducts a similar qualitative study on the same problem depends on several factors, including the research design, data collection methods, and the interpretive nature of qualitative research. Qualitative studies often involve subjective interpretations, which can vary based on the investigator's perspectives, experiences, and biases (Creswell & Poth, 2018). Nonetheless, if the core phenomena are well-defined and consistent across different researchers' observations, there may be a degree of convergence in findings, especially if they employ similar methodologies and uphold rigorous analytic standards (Liamputtong, 2019). However, variations in researcher approach can influence the depth, focus, and nuance of the findings, which might lead to some differences in conclusions.
Regarding transferability, qualitative research typically offers rich, contextualized insights rather than broad generalizations. Transferability refers to the extent to which study findings can be applied or transferred to other settings or groups, relying heavily on the similarity between contexts (Malterud, 2019). The original study's detailed descriptions allow readers to assess whether the findings are applicable to their own contexts, thereby facilitating transferability (Guba & Lincoln, 2018). While the findings may not be universally generalizable, their transferability depends on the similarity of settings and participants, and the transparency with which the original researcher describes the context and methodology.
References
- Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
- Liamputtong, P. (2019). Qualitative research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 195-219). Sage Publications.
- Malterud, K. (2019). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet, 393(10185), 2089-2098.