Ol 342 Journal Rubric: The Journal Activities In This 978679

Ol 342 Journal Rubric The journal activities in this course are private between the student and the instructor.

The journal activities in this course are private between the student and the instructor. A course journal in Blackboard is generally made up of many individual entries. Review this tutorial for information on creating a Blackboard journal entry. Each journal is graded separately. Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard.

Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructions. Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value Reflective Response Journal entry supports claims with relevant examples of personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process Journal entry supports claims with mostly relevant examples of personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process Journal entry supports claims with somewhat relevant personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process Journal entry does not support claims with reflection on relevant personal examples 25 Comprehensive Response Entry shows excellent depth of knowledge of the module content and exhibits careful consideration of the topic Entry shows good depth of knowledge of the module content and demonstrates that the student has read the module content Entry shows limited depth of knowledge, indicating the student may have reviewed the module content but needs to explore further Entry does not address the prompt and reflects that the student has not read the module content 25 Voice Journal entry is written in a style that is appealing and appropriate for the intended audience, and a consistent voice is evident throughout Journal entry is written in a style that is generally appropriate for the intended audience, and an attempt is made to use a consistent voice Journal entry is written in a style that considers the audience, but the author’s voice is not consistent and is difficult to identify Journal entry does not attempt to use a style that considers audience, and there is no evidence of author voice 25 Writing Journal entry is free of errors in organization and grammar Journal entry is mostly free of errors of organization and grammar; errors are marginal and rarely interrupt the flow Journal entry contains errors of organization and grammar, but these are limited enough so that entry can be understood Journal entry contains errors of organization and grammar making the journal difficult to understand 25 Total 100%

Paper For Above instruction

The journal activities in this course serve as a critical reflective tool designed to foster deeper understanding of the course material while providing a private avenue for students to communicate their insights and experiences directly to the instructor. These reflections are essential for assessing individual comprehension and the ability to connect practical experiences with theoretical concepts. A well-constructed journal entry should demonstrate not only an understanding of the module content but also the capacity to analyze and synthesize relevant personal or learned experiences in relation to the topics covered.

The reflective response component emphasizes the importance of backing claims with specific examples from personal experience, previous academic work, or logical reasoning. This approach helps to contextualize theoretical knowledge, making it more meaningful and applicable. For instance, when discussing leadership theories introduced in the module, a student might reflect on their own leadership experiences in a workplace or community setting, illustrating how these real-life instances align with or differ from academic models. Such detailed reflections showcase critical engagement with the content and enhance learning outcomes.

Comprehensive responses are characterized by a thorough grasp of the module's content, demonstrating that the student has invested effort into understanding and considering the material. Depth of knowledge is evidenced through well-articulated explanations, thoughtful analyses, and the integration of relevant examples. Effective responses also show evidence that the student has thoroughly reviewed the module content, highlighting the importance of engaging with all provided resources, discussions, and assigned readings.

Writing style and voice are equally crucial in making journal entries appealing and appropriately tailored to the audience—primarily the instructor reviewing the work. Consistency in tone and clarity in communication reflect professionalism and attentiveness. Students should aim to write in a manner that maintains the reader's interest and delivers insights clearly, without grammatical or organizational errors which could detract from readability and comprehension.

In summary, high-quality journal entries are characterized by reflective depth, evidence-based claims, comprehensive understanding, a coherent style suited for academic reflection, and impeccable writing mechanics. These elements collectively ensure that the journal serves as an effective tool for learning and assessment in the course context.

References

• Dornyei, Z. (2009). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Moon, J. A. (2004). A Handbook of Reflective and Experiential Learning: Theory and Practice. RoutledgeFalmer.
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action. Basic Books.
• Moon, J. A. (2013). Reflection and Employability: Reflection for Learning and Self-Development. Routledge.
• Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. Routledge.
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall.
• Roberts, G. (2010). Reflective Practice in Education: Cultivating Learners' Reflective Abilities. Routledge.
• Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. Jossey-Bass.
• Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. Jossey-Bass.
• Baker, S. E., & Edwards, R. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough? National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper.