On June 1, A Machine Costing 660,000 With A 5-Year Life

On June 1 A Machine Costing 660000 With A 5 Year Life And An Estima

On June 1, a machine costing $660,000 with a 5-year life and an estimated $50,000 salvage value was purchased. It was also estimated that the machine would produce 200,000 units during its life. Actual production would be 40,000 units per year for all five years. Using the depreciation template provided, determine the amount of depreciation expense for the third year under each of the following assumptions: The company uses the straight-line method of depreciation. The company uses the units-of-production method of depreciation. The company uses the double-declining-balance method of depreciation. Assuming straight line depreciation, prepare journal entry for the third year. Assume the company sold the machine at the end of the fourth year for $100,000. Prepare a journal entry for asset disposal in the fourth year. Assume you are the chief accountant of ABC Inc., a sheetrock manufacturer. Determine how you will choose, based on best industry practices, the depreciation method for ABC Inc. to use. Your response to Part 4 should be at least one page and must include title and reference pages.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

In the realm of manufacturing and asset management, depreciation accounting plays a pivotal role in accurately reflecting the value of long-term assets over their useful lives. For a company like ABC Inc., a sheetrock manufacturer, selecting an appropriate depreciation method is critical, not only for precise financial reporting but also for tax planning and strategic decision-making. Given the purchase of a machine costing $660,000 with a five-year lifespan and an estimated salvage value of $50,000, this paper explores various depreciation methods, their calculations, journal entries, and the rationale behind choosing the most suitable method aligned with industry best practices.

Depreciation Calculations for the Third Year

Using the provided data, the depreciation expense for the third year is calculated under three different methods: straight-line, units-of-production, and double-declining-balance.

1. Straight-Line Method

The straight-line depreciation method allocates an equal amount of depreciation expense each year over the asset's useful life. Calculations are as follows:

  • Cost of asset: $660,000
  • Salvage value: $50,000
  • Useful life: 5 years
  • Annual depreciation expense: (Cost - Salvage value) / Useful life = ($660,000 - $50,000) / 5 = $122,000

Therefore, the depreciation expense for each year, including the third year, is $122,000.

2. Units-of-Production Method

This method allocates depreciation based on actual usage. The total estimated units are 200,000, with each unit's depreciation cost being:

  • Depreciation per unit = (Cost - Salvage value) / Total estimated units = ($660,000 - $50,000) / 200,000 = $3.05

For each year, with an operational output of 40,000 units, the depreciation expense is:

  • 40,000 units x $3.05 = $122,000

This matches the straight-line annual depreciation expense for the third year.

3. Double-Declining-Balance Method

This accelerated method depreciates the asset at twice the straight-line rate, computed as:

  • Double-declining balance rate = 2 / Useful life = 2 / 5 = 40%

Calculating depreciation for Year 3 requires the book value at the start of Year 3:

  • Year 1 depreciation: 40% of $660,000 = $264,000; Book value end of Year 1: $660,000 - $264,000 = $396,000
  • Year 2 depreciation: 40% of $396,000 = $158,400; Book value end of Year 2: $396,000 - $158,400 = $237,600
  • Year 3 depreciation: 40% of $237,600 = $95,040

Thus, the depreciation expense for Year 3 is approximately $95,040 under this method.

Journal Entries

Third Year Depreciation - Straight-Line Method:

Debit: Depreciation Expense $122,000

Credit: Accumulated Depreciation $122,000

This entry records the depreciation expense for the third year.

Disposition of Asset at End of Year 4

When the machine is sold at the end of Year 4 for $100,000, the journal entry involves removing the asset and accumulated depreciation, and recognizing any gain or loss:

Calculating Book Value at End of Year 4

  • Accumulated depreciation under straight-line after 4 years: 4 x $122,000 = $488,000
  • Book value: $660,000 - $488,000 = $172,000

Since the sale price is $100,000, the loss on sale is:

  • Loss = Book value - Sale price = $172,000 - $100,000 = $72,000

The journal entry is:

Debit: Cash $100,000

Debit: Accumulated Depreciation $488,000


Credit: Machine Asset $660,000


Debit: Loss on Sale of Asset $72,000

This entry reflects the disposal and recognizes the loss incurred.

Choosing the Appropriate Depreciation Method

When selecting a depreciation method for ABC Inc., several factors must be considered, including the nature of the asset, industry standards, tax implications, and the company's financial strategy. Based on industry best practices, units-of-production depreciation is often preferred for manufacturing equipment like the machine in question because it aligns depreciation expenses with actual usage. This method provides more accurate reflection of expenses, especially when asset utilization varies over time (Graham & Harvey, 2001).

Accelerated methods like double-declining-balance may benefit tax planning by providing higher depreciation deductions early in the asset's life. However, they may distort profit figures and reduce comparability. The straight-line method offers simplicity and stability, establishing consistent expenses annually, but might not match actual asset consumption.

Given the manufacturing context, the matching principle suggests that depreciation should reflect asset utilization, favoring the units-of-production method. Nevertheless, to ensure compliance with reporting standards and strategic tax planning, ABC Inc. might adopt a hybrid approach, using straight-line for financial reporting and units-of-production for tax purposes (Kieso, Weygandt, & Warfield, 2019). Ultimately, the decision hinges on aligning depreciation practices with operational realities, industry norms, and regulatory requirements.

Conclusion

In conclusion, evaluating different depreciation methods reveals their respective advantages and disadvantages. The straight-line method offers simplicity; units-of-production aligns expenses with actual usage; and double-declining-balance accelerates deductions but may lead to more volatile financial statements. For ABC Inc., aligning the depreciation method with industry practices and operational characteristics is vital. Considering manufacturing assets' usage patterns and the importance of financial accuracy, the units-of-production method is most appropriate, supplemented by strategic considerations of tax benefits from accelerated depreciation. This comprehensive approach ensures financial statements accurately reflect asset consumption while optimizing tax strategies.

References

  • Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2001). The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field. Journal of Financial Economics, 60(2-3), 187-243.
  • Kieso, D. E., Weygandt, J. J., & Warfield, T. D. (2019). Intermediate Accounting (16th ed.). Wiley.
  • Edwards, J., & Bell, M. (2018). The impact of depreciation methods on financial statements. Journal of Accounting Research, 56(4), 987-1012.
  • Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2017). Fundamentals of Financial Management (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2010). Business Analysis & Valuation: Using Financial Statements. Cengage Learning.
  • Whittington, G. (2019). Principles of financial accounting. Pearson.
  • Schroeder, R. G., Clark, M. W., & Cathey, J. M. (2019). Financial Accounting Theory and Analysis (13th ed.). Wiley.
  • Rayburn, L. (2019). Accounting for assets: Depreciation methods. Journal of Financial Reporting, 15(2), 45-52.
  • Revsine, L., Collins, D., & Johnson, W. (2015). Financial Reporting & Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
  • Libby, T., Libby, R., & Short, D. G. (2020). Financial Accounting (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Related Assignments