On Trust In The Internet: Belief Cues From Domain Suffixes

On Trust In The Internet Belief Cues From Domain Suffixes And Seals

Beliefs about the validity and reliability of Internet website information are crucial for both users and the success of a website. This study investigates factors influencing trust in online information, specifically examining perceptions based on domain suffixes and seals of approval, as well as demographic variables and internet usage patterns.

A total of 247 participants, including 171 undergraduate students and 76 non-students, completed surveys assessing their trust in various aspects of internet content. Participants expressed that, on average, they trust approximately 55% of the information they find on the internet. The study explored how trust varies according to the domain suffixes (.gov, .edu, .org, .net, and .com), seals of approval (credible and fictitious), as well as demographic factors such as occupation and hours spent online.

Introduction

The internet is a vast and diverse source of information, encompassing both accurate and unreliable content. As the internet continues to evolve, trust remains a central concern, especially since anyone can publish material online. Search engines facilitate access to this information, but not all sites provide valid or up-to-date data, raising consumer protection concerns. Misinformation, phishing, and fraudulent websites can undermine user confidence and pose risks of privacy breaches and financial scams (Baker, 1999; Andreou et al., 2001).

Understanding how users develop perceptions of trust in online environments is vital. New and infrequent users may lack the experience necessary to critically evaluate site credibility, rendering them vulnerable to deception. Conversely, experienced users may develop heuristics or cues—such as website design, domain suffixes, and seals of approval—that influence their trust judgments (Fogg et al., 2002; Aubert, Dewit, & Roy, 2001).

Factors Influencing Trust

Domain Suffixes

Domain suffixes serve as initial indicators of the nature and credibility of a website. Common suffixes include .gov, .edu, .org, .net, and commercial sites (.com). Prior research suggests that .gov and .edu domains are perceived as more trustworthy due to their associations with government agencies and higher education institutions, respectively (Lebo, 2003). Conversely, .com and .net domain sites, typically associated with commercial enterprises, often evoke skepticism because of varying quality and potential for misleading information.

The study found that participants rated .gov and .edu sites significantly higher in trustworthiness than other suffixes. Participants who spent more hours online (>15 hours/week) showed an increased tendency to trust these suffixes, likely due to greater familiarity and exposure (George, 2002). Moreover, students, with their higher propensity for web use, exhibited higher trust levels for .gov and .edu sites than non-students, indicating that familiarity builds perceived credibility.

Seals of Approval

Seals of approval are visual cues created by third-party organizations to signal adherence to standards, such as data security or privacy policies. Participants in the study rated Verisign as the most trustworthy seal, followed by others like the Health Web Site Accreditation and Trust-e seals. Interestingly, fictitious seals devised by the experimenters received trust ratings comparable to real seals, highlighting a potential lack of discrimination based solely on the visual cue. This suggests that users may rely heavily on seal presence without verifying the seal's legitimacy (Stanford, 2002; Fogg et al., 2002).

Participants who used the internet more extensively (>15 hours/week) demonstrated higher trust in certain seals, especially Verisign and BizRate.com, which are associated with reputable vendors. This increased trust aligns with theories that familiarity and positive brand associations foster perceived security and credibility (Goldsmith & Lafferty, 2002). Notably, students trusted a broader range of seals, including one fictitious seal, which underscores their greater overall trust or possible naivety.

Demographic and Usage Factors

The analysis revealed that demographic factors such as occupation (student vs. non-student) and internet usage hours significantly influence trust perceptions. Students and frequent internet users tend to trust more sites and cues overall. This pattern suggests that increased exposure boosts confidence, although it may also foster complacency or overtrust, especially regarding fictitious cues.

The findings also indicated that more experienced internet users rely on cues like seals and domain suffixes more heavily, but their trust is not absolute. Even among highly trusted seals, some fictitious or less credible sites can appear convincing due to visual similarities, implying a need for skepticism and critical evaluation skills (Barkat & Siyal, 2002).

Implications and Conclusions

This study confirms that trust in internet sources is influenced by easily observable cues such as domain suffixes and seals of approval. Nevertheless, users demonstrate varying levels of skepticism, and fictitious seals can sometimes be mistaken for legitimate endorsements. The reliance on such cues underscores the importance of user education regarding digital literacy and critical evaluation of online information.

Furthermore, the study highlights the potential for overtrust among frequent internet users and students, emphasizing that familiarity can sometimes lead to complacency and a false sense of security. For website developers and certifying organizations, ensuring that seals of approval are both visible and verifiable is critical for maintaining trustworthiness and protecting consumers from deception.

Overall, fostering digital literacy, enhancing transparency, and establishing robust verification processes are essential strategies to improve trust and mitigate risks associated with online misinformation and scams.

References

• Andreou, A., Kanellis, P., Martakos, D., & Papadopoulou, P. (2001). Trust and relationship building in electronic commerce. Internet Research, 11, 56-70.
• Aubert, B. A., Dewit, O., & Roy, M. C. (2001). The impact of interface usability on trust in web retailers. Internet Research, 11, 34-45.
• Baker, R. C. (1999). An analysis of fraud on the internet. Internet Research, 5, 3-13.
• Barkat, B., & Siyal, M. Y. (2002). A novel trust service provider for internet based commerce applications. Internet Research, 12, 56-62.
• Fogg, B. J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D., Marable, L., Stanford, J., & Tauber, E. R. (2002). How do people evaluate a web site’s credibility? Persuasive Technology Lab Stanford University, Consumer Webwatch.
• Goldsmith, R. E., & Lafferty, B. A. (2002). Consumer response to web sites and their influence on advertising effectiveness. Internet Research, 12, 24-35.
• Lebo, H. (2003). The UCLA Internet report surveying the digital future. UCLA Center for Communication Policy.
• Stanford, J., Tauber, E. R., Fogg, B. J., & Marable, L. (2002). Trust and credibility assessments in e-commerce. Conference proceedings, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 47th annual meeting.
• Princeton Survey Research Associates. (2002). A matter of trust: What users want from web sites. Consumer Web Watch.
• Ratnasingam, P. (2000). The influence of power on trading partner trust in electronic commerce. Internet Research, 12, 55-65.