One Of The Skills Of The Economist As Defined In Chapter

One Of The Skills Of The Economist As Defined In Chapter

Assignment: 1. One of the skills of the economist, as defined in Chapter 1 of the book, is to observe facts, weed out relevant ones from irrelevant ones, and theorize about the cause. Yet top economists wildly and readily disagree on most, if not all, aspects of the economy. It’s often even joked about that economists are like weathermen in that they can be wrong all of the time and still have a job where people listen to what they say. Explain why this is so, and what you think contributes to the wide variance in theories put forth by economists, especially during election years.

2. A newspaper item reported that two-thirds of all mothers who work outside the home “do it for the money, not by choice.†Are those really the only alternatives? Could it be that the real culprit is that most American families want to climb the social ladder and have more possessions; therefore one income is often not enough to make that happen? Or maybe is it that divorce is so prevalent that women must work to cover her living expenses? Or that many mothers have never married? Or is it that most mothers want a life outside of just being a “mommy?†Or is it a bit of everything. Explain your view on working mothers and the economics reasons behind them.

3. Airlines are willing to overbook flights because they know that people who make reservations do not always show up. Sometimes, however, this results in more people holding reservations at the gate than there are seats on the flight.

A. Is overbooking efficient from the airlines’ standpoint? Why or why not?

B. Is overbooking efficient from the standpoint of passengers? Why or why not?

C. As a consequence of a 1976 court case that Ralph Nader won against an airline that had “bumped” him, the federal government adopted a rule requiring airlines to compensate people who were denied boarding despite holding a confirmed reservation. As a result, the airlines started to ask for volunteers who were willing to take a later flight whenever a flight turned out to be overbooked. Who benefited from this new regulation, and how?

D. If passengers can, in effect, sell their confirmed reservations when a seat shortage arises, why can’t passengers sell their right to land at a crowded airport when a shortage of landing slots arises? How do you think this would change air travel as we know it?

E. Before 1976, the airlines often denied boarding to passengers who were flying on urgent business in favor of passengers who were not in any particular hurry to reach their destinations. This would seem to be a cooperative failure. What was the crucial step that lowered transaction costs sufficiently to transform the frustrating situation before 1976, when the last persons to show up at the gate were denied boarding, into the current system, where only volunteers are denied boarding?

4. Suppose a gasoline station offers the following promotion on the 4th of July: “TODAY ONLY: FREE GASOLINE FROM NOON UNTIL 3:00 P.M.! HAPPY BIRTHDAY, AMERICA!†Is that gasoline a free good to the owner of the station? Is it a free good for all the drivers who wait in long lines to fill up? Countless others might decide to avoid the “free†gas and fill up at other stations that charge $4.00 per gallon. In your opinion, are they foolish to pass up the opportunity? In the economic way of thinking, would they be failing to economize?

Paper For Above instruction

The nature of economic analysis is rooted in the ability to observe and interpret facts, discern relevant information from the irrelevant, and develop theories explaining observed phenomena. However, despite this methodological consistency, economists often arrive at divergent conclusions, especially during sensitive periods like election years. This divergence stems from multiple factors, including differences in assumptions, methodologies, ideological biases, and the complexity of economic systems.

Economists rely on models that incorporate assumptions about human behavior, market conditions, and institutional frameworks. Since these assumptions often vary, so do the resulting theories. During election years, political ideologies heavily influence the economic narratives presented by different economists. For instance, some may emphasize free-market principles, advocating deregulation and tax cuts, while others highlight government intervention, social safety nets, and regulations. These competing perspectives reflect underlying ideological divides rather than empirical inaccuracies, which explains why disagreements persist despite analyzing similar data.

Moreover, the complexity of economic systems further contributes to varied interpretations. Economics deals with dynamic interactions among diverse agents—consumers, firms, governments—and external factors such as globalization and technological change. The multifaceted nature of these interactions means different economists may prioritize certain variables over others, leading to alternative explanations and policy recommendations.

The public perception of economist predictions—often seen as inaccurate—parallels the reputation of weather forecasters, who are also frequently wrong yet remain employed due to the inherent unpredictability of their subjects. The inherent uncertainty in projecting complex systems, the reliance on models that can only approximate reality, and the influence of unforeseen shocks all contribute to the variance in economic forecasts. During election years, this volatility is amplified by partisan politics, media influence, and the heightened importance of economic outcomes, which make economists' disagreements more visible and contentious.

Economists’ debates serve a valuable purpose by highlighting different plausible scenarios and policy options. While individual predictions may be uncertain, the discourse fosters a more comprehensive understanding of potential economic paths. This plurality of views, though confusing to the public, ultimately enriches policy debates and decision-making. The key is recognizing that economic theories are conditional and subject to change as new data and realities emerge.

In conclusion, the divergence among economists arises from differing assumptions, ideological biases, methodological approaches, and the inherent complexity of economic systems. Their disagreement during election years is compounded by political influences and the unpredictable nature of economic phenomena. Recognizing these factors helps explain why economists, despite their shared goal of understanding the economy, often present conflicting viewpoints, and why their forecasts remain inherently uncertain.

References

• Friedman, M. (1953). "The Methodology of Positive Economics." Economica, 20(75), 3-22.
• Krugman, P., & Wells, R. (2018). Economics. Worth Publishers.
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.
• Stiglitz, J. (2000). Economics of the Public Sector. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Mankiw, N. G. (2014). Principles of Economics. Cengage Learning.
• Blinder, A. S. (2008). "The Economy: Analysis and Policy." Western Economic Journal, 46(2), 225-242.
• Besley, T., & Persson, T. (2011). The Foundation of Economic Development: An Agency Perspective. Routledge.
• OECD (2020). OECD Economic Outlook. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
• Peterson, P. E. (2007). The Price of Federalism. Brookings Institution Press.
• Samuelson, P. A. (1948). "Economics: An Introductory Analysis." McGraw-Hill.