One-To-One Function And Its Inverse

A One To One Function And Its Inverse Can Be Used To Make Information

A one-to-one function and its inverse can be used to make information secure. The function is used to encrypt a message, and its inverse is used to decrypt the encrypted message. The following numerical values are assigned to each letter of the alphabet: A 1 B 2 C 3 D 4 E 5 F 6 G 7 H 8 I 9 J 10 K 11 L 12 M 13 N 14 O 15 P 16 Q 17 R 18 S 19 T 20 U 21 V 22 W 23 X 24 Y 25 Z 26. Using the function f(x)=3x-1, the message “HELLO” would be encrypted since H corresponds to 8 and f(8)=3(8)-1=23, which corresponds to the letter W, and similarly for the other letters.

Paper For Above instruction

Cryptography is an essential aspect of data security, particularly in safeguarding sensitive information during transmission or storage. Among various cryptographic techniques, the use of one-to-one functions (bijections) and their inverses provides a straightforward yet effective approach to encryption and decryption, ensuring that messages can be securely encoded and decoded solely with the knowledge of the specific functions employed.

A one-to-one function, by definition, maps each distinct element of a set to a unique element in another set, guaranteeing that no two distinct inputs produce the same output. When such functions are used in conjunction with their inverses, they facilitate secure communication channels because only those possessing the inverse function can decrypt the message. This concept is particularly relevant in simple substitution ciphers, where numerical mappings of alphabetic characters are transformed through mathematical functions to produce encrypted messages.

The example provided, f(x)=3x-1, demonstrates how an algebraic function can be employed to encode alphabetic characters numerically. Assigning each letter of the alphabet to a number from 1 to 26 (A=1, B=2, ..., Z=26), the function f(x)=3x-1 produces a new number for each original value, which corresponds to a different letter—thus encrypting the message. For instance, the letter H (8) is transformed as f(8)=3(8)-1=23, which corresponds to the letter W.

This methodology can be extended to encode various messages related to class topics, such as historical dates, scientific concepts, or vocabulary terms. To ensure secure communication, students are encouraged to choose their own invertible functions, demonstrate how the functions encrypt their messages, and provide the respective decryption process using inverse functions. This exercise reinforces understanding of algebraic functions, inverses, and their practical applications in security.

For example, if a student selects the function g(x)=2x+5, they would first convert their message into numerical form, apply the function to encrypt each value, then translate the resulting numbers back into letters. To decrypt, they would use the inverse function g-1(x)=(x-5)/2, reverse the encryption process, and recover the original message.

Implementing these functions in classroom exercises demonstrates how mathematical concepts underpin modern cryptography, emphasizing the importance of bijections for secure information transfer. Students should practice creating their own functions, performing encryption and decryption, and explaining the relevance of these operations in securing digital communication.

References

  • Stallings, W. (2017). Cryptography and Network Security: Principles and Practice. Pearson Education.
  • Katz, J., & Lindell, Y. (2014). Introduction to Modern Cryptography. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  • Trappe, W., & Washington, L. (2006). Introduction to Cryptography with Coding Theory. Pearson.
  • Singh, S. (1999). The Code Book: The Science of Secrecy from Ancient Egypt to Quantum Cryptography. Anchor Books.
  • Diffie, W., & Hellman, M. (1976). New Directions in Cryptography. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 22(6), 644-654.
  • Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A., & Adleman, L. (1978). A Method for Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public-Key Cryptosystems. Communications of the ACM, 21(2), 120-126.
  • Boneh, D., & Shoup, V. (2020). A Graduate Course in Applied Cryptography. Draft edition.
  • Bailey, D., & Yampolskiy, R. (2017). Artificial Intelligence Safety and Security. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  • Golomb, S. W., & Gong, G. (2005). Signal Design for Good Correlation: For Wireless Communication, Cryptography, and Radar. Cambridge University Press.
  • Menezes, A. J., van Oorschot, P. C., & Vanstone, S. A. (1996). Handbook of Applied Cryptography. CRC Press.

Related Assignments