Operations Management Module 3 Assignment 2 Lasa 1 Conductin
Operations Managementmodule 3 Assignment 2 Lasa 1conducting An Organ
Operations Management Module 3 Assignment 2: LASA 1—Conducting an Organizational Assessment The success of an organization depends heavily on its structure, strategies, and culture. In this assignment, you will develop an understanding of the importance of these elements in the success or failure of an enterprise. This assignment is the first of the two LASA assignments you will complete in this course. Using the Argosy University online library resources and the Internet, research methods of conducting internal and external environment analyses. Select at least three scholarly sources to support the information in your report.
Scenario: You have been hired as a consultant to evaluate the performance of a manufacturing or service organization. You need to assess the organization’s current position with regard to their business operations, strategy, and organizational structure, and identify potential ethical issues management may face. The management team has asked you to submit a report of your findings.
Choose a publicly traded manufacturing or service organization about which there is abundant publicly available information. Conduct your review using the following approach:
- Evaluate the company’s business strategy and global competitiveness plan.
- Conduct an internal assessment using SWOT analysis.
- Assess the external environment via an external scenario evaluation.
- Sketch the company’s organizational structure.
- Define the organization’s business process using the tools of business process design.
- Identify potential ethical issues affecting traditional management functions and recommend preventative measures.
Your report should be 8–10 pages, written clearly and concisely, demonstrating ethical scholarship with proper source attribution using APA standards. Support your analysis with at least three scholarly sources.
Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
The assessment of an organization’s internal and external environments is crucial for understanding its current position and strategic direction. As a consultant tasked with evaluating a publicly traded company, it is essential to employ comprehensive analysis tools such as SWOT analysis, external scenario evaluation, and organizational structure sketching. This report focuses on evaluating the global competitiveness policies, internal strengths and weaknesses, external opportunities and threats, and the organizational design of Apple Inc., a leading technology conglomerate. Additionally, potential ethical issues pertinent to its management practices will be identified, with recommendations provided to mitigate risks.
Company’s Business Strategy and Global Competitiveness Plan
Apple Inc. has positioned itself as a leading innovator in consumer electronics, software, and digital services. Its business strategy centers on differentiation through high-quality products, a seamless integrated ecosystem, and aggressive investment in research and development (R&D). Apple's global competitiveness rests on brand loyalty, superior user experience, and an extensive supply chain network (Lashinsky, 2012). The company aims to sustain its competitive edge by continuously innovating and expanding its services, including Apple Pay, music streaming, and cloud storage, thereby diversifying revenue streams and reinforcing its global footprint.
Internal Assessment Using SWOT Analysis
Strengths: Strong brand recognition, innovative product portfolio, integrated ecosystem, robust financial position with high profitability margins (Statista, 2023). Weaknesses: Premium pricing limits market share among price-sensitive consumers, dependence on iPhone sales, supply chain vulnerabilities highlighted during pandemic disruptions (Constine, 2020).
Opportunities: Expansion into emerging markets, growth in wearable technology, potential investments in augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) technologies (Forbes, 2022). Threats: Intense competition from Samsung, Huawei, and other Android manufacturers, regulatory scrutiny over app store practices, supply chain geopolitical risks (CNBC, 2023).
External Environment Evaluation
External scenario analysis indicates rapidly evolving technological trends requiring continuous innovation. The global regulatory environment is tightening, with antitrust investigations into app store practices in the US and EU (European Commission, 2020). Economic factors include fluctuations in exchange rates and tariffs impacting manufacturing costs. Sociocultural trends favor sustainability and privacy, which Apple integrates into its operations and marketing strategies. Political instability, especially concerning China, poses risks to supply chain continuity (Bloomberg, 2022). Environmental concerns emphasize Apple's commitments to renewable energy and recycling initiatives, aligning with societal expectations for corporate social responsibility (CSR).
Organizational Structure
Apple’s organizational structure is decentralized, with functional divisions like hardware engineering, software engineering, marketing, and retail operations. It employs a hierarchical model with a strong CEO-led leadership, supporting innovation through cross-functional teams (Lashinsky, 2012). The structure facilitates quick decision-making, maintains product quality, and supports global operations. The company’s structure reflects its strategic priorities of innovation, operational efficiency, and customer focus.
Business Process Design
Apple’s core business process involves product research and development, supply chain management, manufacturing, marketing, and after-sales service. R&D drives innovation, with cross-disciplinary collaboration fueling product development cycles. Supply chain management emphasizes just-in-time inventory, supplier relationship management, and quality control. The marketing process leverages brand loyalty and robust retail channels. Customer service employs a direct-to-consumer approach, emphasizing user experience and support (Lashinsky, 2012). Integrating these processes ensures product differentiation, operational efficiency, and customer satisfaction.
Ethical Issues and Preventative Measures
Potential ethical challenges include supply chain labor practices, environmental sustainability, and privacy concerns related to data collection. Reports of labor violations in supplier factories and environmental damage from mining materials pose reputational risks (Chang, 2021). Apple has taken steps to address these issues by implementing supplier audits, investing in renewable energy, and enhancing user privacy protections. To further mitigate risks, recommendations include increasing transparency through public reporting, strengthening supplier compliance standards, and fostering stakeholder engagement to align corporate actions with societal expectations.
Conclusion
Conducting a thorough internal and external analysis reveals Apple’s strategic strengths and areas of vulnerability. Its innovative capacity, strong brand, and efficient organizational structure position it well for future growth. However, external political, regulatory, and environmental factors require proactive management strategies. Ethical considerations remain paramount, necessitating transparent and responsible business practices to maintain stakeholder trust and competitive advantage.
References
- Bloomberg. (2022). Apple’s Supply Chain Risks in China and Alternatives. Bloomberg News.
- Constine, J. (2020). Apple’s Supply Chain During the Pandemic. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com
- European Commission. (2020). Antitrust Investigation into Apple’s App Store Practices. European Union Publications.
- Forbes. (2022). Apple’s Growth Opportunities in AR and VR Markets. Forbes Technology Council.
- Lashinsky, A. (2012). Inside Apple: How America's Most Admired—and Secretive—Company Really Works. Hachette Books.
- Statista. (2023). Apple Inc. - Financial Overview. https://statista.com
- CNBC. (2023). Regulatory Challenges Facing Apple. CNBC News.
- Chang, A. (2021). Ethical Supply Chain Management in Technology Companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(2), 245-260.