Option 1: Financing Activities Analysis Hayes Inc Answer

Option 1 Financing Activities Analysis Hayes Incanswer The Follow

The assignment involves analyzing contingent losses in the context of lawsuits faced by car companies, specifically focusing on the challenges managers encounter in quantifying and accruing for such losses, and subsequently, accounting for a capital lease arrangement by Hayes, Inc., including its impact on financial statements. The task requires a discussion-based response complemented by detailed financial calculations, tables, and an explanation of the financial implications of leasing versus purchasing equipment, supported by appropriate references.

Paper For Above instruction

Contingent Losses and Managerial Discretion

Managers often resist quantifying and accruing liabilities for contingent losses such as lawsuits due to several reasons. Firstly, the inherent uncertainty regarding the outcome of legal cases presents a significant challenge; estimating the probable loss involves subjective judgment, and managers may prefer to delay recognition to avoid premature acknowledgment of liabilities that might not materialize. Secondly, managers may be concerned about the adverse impact on financial metrics, such as earnings and stock prices, if liabilities are recognized prematurely, leading to potential managerial bias to understate liabilities until the outcome becomes more certain. This discretion stems from the ambiguity associated with "probable" and "estimable" standards set forth in accounting regulations.

However, there are circumstances under which managers might be willing to recognize a contingent loss earlier. For instance, if new evidence significantly increases the likelihood of an adverse lawsuit outcome or if legal experts affirm that settlement or verdict is imminent, managers may determine that the loss is both probable and estimable. In such cases, accrual becomes prudent to ensure that financial statements accurately reflect the company's liabilities, aligning with the principles of conservatism and faithful representation mandated by accounting standards.

Lease Accounting for Hayes, Inc.

In this scenario, Hayes, Inc. enters into a five-year capital lease agreement with Smithsonian Company for equipment with an annual lease rental of $25,000. Given the lease's terms, the fair value of the equipment is the present value of the lease payments, calculated using the interest rate implicit in the lease of 8%. Using the annuity factor from tables, the present value of the lease payments is $3.993 per dollar of annual payment, leading to the initial recognition of the leased asset and lease liability at approximately $99,825 (i.e., $25,000 × 3.993). Since the use of the asset aligns with its estimated useful life, the lease qualifies as a capital lease, requiring capitalization on Hayes's balance sheet and amortization of the asset over five years.

Accounting entries for 2014 include recognizing the leased asset and liability at inception, and recording annual interest and amortization expenses. The lease liability is reduced through payments that comprise interest expense and principal repayment. In the income statement, interest expense decreases over time as the liability decreases, while amortization expense remains constant if the asset is amortized on a straight-line basis. On the balance sheet, both assets and liabilities increase initially and diminish over time as payments are made.

When comparing leasing versus purchasing, leasing provides benefits such as off-balance-sheet financing (if not classified as a capital lease), and flexibility in upgrading equipment. However, the total interest expense over the lease term increases the overall cost compared to a direct purchase. Cash flows differ as lease payments are operating cash outflows, while purchasing involves initial capital outlay and subsequent depreciation and interest payments over time. Overall, leasing can improve short-term liquidity metrics but may lead to higher long-term costs, depending on the lease and purchase terms.

Financial Tables and Impact

Below are the tables illustrating interest and principal payments over the lease term, and expenses if the equipment were purchased:

YearInterest PaidPrincipal PaidRemaining Liability
2014$8,385$16,615$83,210
2015$6,657$18,343$64,867
2016$5,189$19,811$45,056
2017$3,604$21,396$23,660
2018$1,893$23,107$0

For purchased equipment, the annual depreciation expense would be approximately $19,961 (assuming straight-line over five years), with no interest expense. Total expenses each year would be depreciation, totaling $99,805 over five years, plus other costs if applicable. The cash flow effect varies: leasing payments are operational expenses with consistent cash outflows, while purchasing involves a significant initial cash outlay and subsequent recurring expenses.

Discussion on Income and Cash Flow Implications

The choice between leasing and purchasing affects both income statements and cash flows significantly. Leasing offers a predictable expense structure via lease payments, which are recorded as operating expenses, thereby simplifying financial planning. It also preserves the company's cash and credit lines for other purposes. However, lease payments include interest costs, which increase the total expenditure over the lease term. Additionally, leasing can improve certain financial ratios, making the company appear less leveraged, which might appeal to creditors and investors.

In contrast, purchasing equipment requires a large upfront cash outflow reflected as an asset on the balance sheet, with subsequent depreciation affecting the income statement. The initial outlay can strain cash flow but results in lower overall costs if the asset's residual value and depreciation expense are favorable. The decision rests on a strategic analysis of the company's financial position, cash flow preferences, and the economic life of the equipment. Ultimately, leasing provides flexibility and conserves capital, but purchasing can be more cost-effective over the long term if the company can afford the initial expenditure.

References

  • FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 842, Leases. (2020). Financial Accounting Standards Board.
  • Kieso, D. E., Weygandt, J. J., & Warfield, T. D. (2021). Intermediate Accounting (16th ed.). Wiley.
  • Arnold, R., & Willett, R. (2018). Financial & Managerial Accounting. Routledge.
  • Hilton, R. W., & Platt, D. E. (2017). Managerial Accounting: Creating Value in a Dynamic Business Environment. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Rittenberg, L., Johnstone, K., & Gramling, A. (2018). Financial & Managerial Accounting. Cengage Learning.
  • Whittington, G., & Wainwright, R. (2017). Principles of Financial Accounting. Pearson.
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2022). Financial Reporting Manual.
  • International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS 16). (2016). IFRS Foundation.
  • Berk, J., & DeMarzo, P. (2020). Corporate Finance. Pearson.
  • Dechow, P. M., & Schrand, C. (2004). Earnings Quality. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 961-1014.