Option 2 Cash Shortage Investigation Read The Portfolio Proj

Option 2 Cash Shortage Investigationread The Portfolio Project Optio

The Portfolio Project Option 2 involves investigating ongoing cash shortages at ABC, a subsidiary of Acme Manufacturing, to identify potential fraud, determine the responsible individual(s), evaluate internal control weaknesses, and recommend measures to prevent future occurrences. The investigation requires analyzing evidence, understanding the internal environment, and preparing a comprehensive report that includes legal considerations, suspect profiling, and interview strategies.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The investigation into ABC’s recurring cash shortages presents a complex scenario involving potential financial fraud, weak internal controls, and possible violations of regulatory standards such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. This paper aims to analyze the nature of the suspected fraud, identify perpetrators, examine internal control vulnerabilities, assess legal violations, and outline investigative procedures, including evidence procurement and interview protocols. Through a detailed, methodical approach, the report will provide an evidence-based foundation to support potential charges and preventive measures.

Type of Fraud and Rationale

The primary type of fraud suspected in this scenario appears to be employee embezzlement or misappropriation of funds. Specifically, the cash shortages, particularly at paycheck dates, combined with increased bank fees, suggest that an individual within ABC might be diverting cash for personal enrichment (Albrecht et al., 2014). The fact that Connie, the administrative assistant and a key figure in financial dealings, has increased borrowing against the company’s credit line and lives beyond her means enhances suspicion. Embezzlement involves theft or misappropriation by individuals entrusted with assets, often facilitated by internal control weaknesses (Anandarajan et al., 2020). Since Connie handles all debt negotiations and banking relations, opportunities for unauthorized cash withdrawal or misappropriation are present.

Possible Perpetrators and Internal Control Weaknesses

The likely perpetrators include Connie, Jan Brown’s sister, given her operational role in managing financial deals, and Kim, the cousin assisting with bank account reconciliation. Their close relationships and access to financial systems provide opportunities for fraudulent activities. The internal control system at ABC appears deficient, as evidenced by the reliance on informal interviews and the absence of regular audits (COSO, 2013). Key internal control weaknesses include:

  • Inadequate segregation of duties: Connie controls both financial transactions and bank relations.
  • Lack of independent verification: No regular external audits or internal audits to verify records.
  • Dependence on oral assurances: Connie’s claim about the soundness of records without external validation.
  • Weak oversight: Jan’s arbitrary management style may discourage scrutiny.

These deficiencies create an environment susceptible to fraud, as opportunities are unmitigated and oversight is insufficient.

Legal Violations and Sarbanes-Oxley Act Considerations

Although ABC has been privately held, the investigation’s scope concerns potential Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) violations if it were a public company. Relevant sections include:

  • Section 302: Management's certification of financial reports—if misreported, falsified records could constitute violations.
  • Section 404: Requirements for internal controls—weak internal controls indicated by the cash shortages could violate this section if assessed in a public context.
  • Section 806: Whistleblower protections—failure to report or investigate suspicious activity may violate federal protections for employees reporting fraud.

Presenting evidence of misstatements or internal control deficiencies would support allegations of violations, especially if misappropriation is confirmed.

Mitigating Internal Control Deficiencies

Improvement strategies include:

  • Implementing strict segregation of duties, ensuring no single individual controls all financial aspects.
  • Establishing regular independent audits by external CPA firms.
  • Enhancing internal controls over cash handling and reconciliation procedures.
  • Introducing automated transaction monitoring systems for suspicious activity.
  • Strengthening oversight mechanisms by management and the board of directors.

Addressing conflicts of interest, such as familial relationships, is critical to restoring control integrity and mitigating opportunistic behaviors.

Motivating Factors, Criminal Opportunities, and Patterns of Behavior

Motivating factors include personal greed, lifestyle inflation, and possible dissatisfaction or resentment. The opportunity arises from the combination of weak controls and Connie’s control over financial transactions. Factors that facilitate criminal conduct encompass:

  • Familiarity with internal processes and the ability to manipulate records.
  • Limited oversight, allowing unauthorized transactions to go unnoticed.
  • Living beyond means, indicating potential financial stress or greed.

Patterns of behavior pointing to potential perpetrators include sudden lifestyle changes, increased credit utilization, and repeated approval of large or unusual transactions.

Evidence Procurement and Investigative Procedures

Essential documents include:

  • Bank statements and canceled checks (subpoena or search warrant needed).
  • Internal financial reports and ledger entries.
  • Receipts and invoices for cash disbursements.
  • Correspondence with the bank and creditors.
  • Audit trails from accounting software.
  • Timekeeping and payroll records.
  • HR records regarding employment and terminations.

Evidence requiring warrants include bank account documents, records stored off-site, or electronically secured files. Confidential interviews should be prepared after reviewing preliminary evidence, with questions focusing on transactional records, access to funds, and behavioral inconsistencies.

Interview Strategy and Questions

The approach should be non-confrontational yet probing, establishing rapport before asking detailed questions about discrepancies and transaction authority. Key questions include:

  1. Can you explain your role in managing ABC’s financial transactions?
  2. Have you noticed any unusual activity or discrepancies in the bank accounts?
  3. Who has access to the cash handling or bank reconciliation processes?
  4. Are you aware of anyone else having unauthorized access to company funds?
  5. Have you ever been asked to approve a transaction you did not understand?
  6. How do you verify that transactions are accurate and legitimate?
  7. Have you or anyone else increased the company’s credit limit recently? Why?
  8. Do your personal financial circumstances or lifestyle reflect irregular income sources?
  9. Have you observed any co-workers acting suspiciously or inconsistently?
  10. Is there any additional information you believe is relevant to this investigation?

Conclusion

The investigation must proceed systematically—collecting and analyzing evidence, interviewing involved parties, and evaluating internal controls. The evidence should establish a link between suspect behaviors and cash shortages, supporting charges of embezzlement or theft. Legal compliance, particularly regarding warrants and subpoenas, ensures admissibility. Ultimately, strengthening internal control weaknesses, establishing rigorous oversight, and fostering an ethical corporate culture will reduce vulnerability to similar fraudulent activities in the future. This comprehensive approach aligns with best practices for fraud detection and prevention, protecting the company’s assets and regulatory compliance.

References

  • Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. C., Albrecht, C. O., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2014). Fraud Examination. Cengage Learning.
  • American Institute of CPAs (AICPA). (2013). Internal Control - Integrated Framework. AICPA.
  • Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2018). Report to the Nations: 2018 Global Study on Occupational Fraud.
  • CosO. (2013). Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
  • Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2003). The Fall of Enron. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(2), 3-26.
  • Lee, T. A., & Farrell, D. (2015). Fraud Risks and Internal Controls in Corporate Governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(4), 737-752.
  • Stanton, W. (2012). Internal Controls and Fraud Prevention. Journal of Accountancy, 213(3), 45-49.
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2002). Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pub. L. No. 107-204.
  • Wineberg, M. (2019). Fraud Prevention in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(2), 408-422.
  • Yamamoto, K., & McDonald, M. (2017). Detecting and Deterring Fraud: Tools and Techniques. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting, 9(1), 112-130.

Related Assignments