Organize Your Initial Or Revised Research Question

Or Your Initial Post Organize Your Revised Research Questions Curren

Or your initial post, organize your revised research questions, current thesis statement, and an outline or checklist of your plan for conducting further research on your topic into a new discussion post. In a few paragraphs, discuss what relevant sources you have identified and the process for accessing those sources. When responding to your peers, critique their plan and offer suggestions for thinking like a historian. Does their plan suggest that they are thinking about change over time, context, causality, complexity, and contingency?

Paper For Above instruction

Begin by revising your initial research questions to ensure they are specific, focused, and capable of guiding a meaningful historical inquiry. Explain how your questions reflect a consideration of broader historical themes such as change over time, causality, and context. Then, present your current thesis statement, making sure it clearly articulates your main argument and how it addresses your research questions.

Next, outline your research plan. Include a list or checklist of primary and secondary sources you intend to consult. Discuss the kinds of archives, libraries, digital repositories, or interviews you plan to access and how these sources will help you answer your research questions. Consider any challenges you might encounter in sourcing these materials and your strategies for overcoming them.

In addition, discuss the relevant sources you have already identified, such as scholarly articles, books, archival records, or digital collections. Describe your process for accessing these sources, including databases, interlibrary loans, or fieldwork.

Finally, in your response to peers, critically evaluate their research plan. Consider if their approach demonstrates an understanding of key historical thinking skills like analyzing change over time, understanding context, identifying causality, recognizing complexity, and considering contingency. Offer constructive suggestions to enhance their research strategy and deepen their historical thinking.

Your post should demonstrate clarity, organization, and critical engagement with your research process, reflecting an increasingly sophisticated understanding of historical inquiry.

References

1. Burke, P. (2018). What Is Cultural History?. Cambridge University Press.
2. Gordon, M. (2015). History and Theory: Contemporary Readings. Routledge.
3. Hunt, L. (2013). Interpreting the Visual. Routledge.
4. Levesque, J. (2019). Digital History: A Guide. Oxford University Press.
5. Novick, P. (2010). That Noble Dream: The "Objectivity Question" and the American Historical Profession. Cambridge University Press.
6. Rosenwein, B. H. (2017). A Short History of the Middle Ages. University of Toronto Press.
7. Thornton, R. (2020). Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts. University of Chicago Press.
8. Ullman, C. (2012). The Historian's Toolbox. Pearson.
9. White, H. (2017). The Structure of Ferdinand de Saussure. Harvard University Press.
10. Yarborough, J. (2019). Research Methods for History. Springer.