Original Papers Are Attached And Need To Be Revised

Original Papers Are Attached And Needs To Be Revised With The Intructi

Original papers are attached and needs to be revised with the instructions my instructor gave me in the paper after grading it. Instructors feedback is pasted on the bottom. Scroll down INSTRUCTORS COMMENT ON PAPER AFTER GRADING. ERRORS THAT NEEDS TO BE FIXED Thanks for your submission of Assignment 3. It requires some reorganization and clarification of the elements.

You did not identify the variables you are measuring, did not adequately describe your instruments (measures of the variables), did not identify your research method, omitted any information about data collection with the instruments or any plans for analysis. Essentially, the paper does not fit the instructions in any way shape or form. Again, if you make revisions, do them in a different color font so they stand out for scoring the revision. If you have questions, please ask. Dr.H Faculty Comments: “ No plans for data analysis are located in this paper. We have no idea whether the data analysis plans make sense or not since we do not know what method your study is using (two of your measures are qualitative and two of them are quantitative) and since none of them are adequately described, we have no way to assess the appropriateness of the plans. After you (1) complete your description of the variables and measures and (2) fully describe what type of questions and the response set to be used for them, then you need to (3) define the method and finally insert (4) how that method is appropriate for the analysis you plan to propose. All the pieces must fit like pieces of a puzzle.  COMPETENCY: Evaluate research methods and psychological research findings. CRITERION: Select appropriate measures for each variable of a research study. DISTINGUISHEDPROFICIENTBASICNON-PERFORMANCE Non-Performance Does not select appropriate measures for each variable of a research study. Faculty Comments: “ These measures are identified in the paper but not described. It is not identified how they will be used. None of them is identified more than to be named. Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire - 16PF Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised - EPQ-R Rorschach Inkblot Test Draw-A-Person Test in For each scale, be sure include the scale of measure for each variable (see text for choices, e.g. nominal, ordinal, etc.) and be sure to include how many questions, types of questions (open ended, multiple choice, etc.), response choices (yes/no, frequency, etc)  CRITERION: Describe how identified methods will be used in a research study. DISTINGUISHEDPROFICIENTBASICNON-PERFORMANCE Non-Performance Does not describe how identified methods will be used in a research study. Faculty Comments: “ The method is not identified. Methods, as we learned in Assignment 1 are either qualitative, quantitative, or both (mixed). A survey is a data collection instrument. Which of these methods will your study use?  CRITERION: Describe the data analysis process for a proposed research study. DISTINGUISHEDPROFICIENTBASICNON-PERFORMANCE Non-Performance Does not describe the data analysis process for a proposed research study. Faculty Comments: “ No data analysis plans are provided in this paper. How do you plan to analyze your variables in the measures you listed?

Paper For Above instruction

The revised research paper must clearly define and describe each component necessary for a comprehensive research plan, including variables, measurement instruments, research methods, data collection procedures, and data analysis strategies. This includes an explicit identification of the variables to be measured, detailed description of the measurement instruments (such as questionnaires, tests, or assessments), the type of questions used, response formats, and how the instruments will be utilized within the study. Furthermore, the paper should specify whether the research approach is qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods, and justify this choice in relation to the research questions.

Variables are the fundamental elements under investigation in the study. For each variable, the paper must describe the specific measurement tools or instruments used, providing information such as the number of questions, question types (e.g., open-ended, multiple-choice), and response options (e.g., yes/no, Likert scales, frequency). For instance, using the 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) involves understanding its scale structure and scoring procedures; similarly, the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised (EPQ-R) and projective tests like the Rorschach Inkblot Test or Draw-A-Person Test require detailed description.

The research method must be explicitly identified—whether qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods. This includes describing the approach to data collection, such as surveys, interviews, or standardized tests, and how these instruments will gather data relevant to each variable. For example, a questionnaire may be administered online or in person, with responses coded numerically or categorically as appropriate.

Details about data collection procedures should address how and when data will be collected, the sample or population involved, and procedures to ensure validity and reliability. Additionally, the paper must specify or plan the statistical or analytical techniques applicable to the data type and research design. For quantitative data, this could include descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, or regression analyses. For qualitative data, thematic analysis or content coding might be appropriate.

Finally, the paper must demonstrate an understanding of how the selected analytical methods are suitable for testing the research hypotheses or answering the research questions, ensuring all elements—variables, measures, research approach, data collection, and analysis—are coherently integrated.

References

  • Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1-55.
  • Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and Validity Assessment. Sage Publications.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. SAGE Publications.
  • Frankel, R. M., & Wallen, N. E. (2015). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Fink, A. (2013). How to Conduct Surveys: A Step-by-Step Guide. SAGE Publications.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson.
  • Ziebland, S., & McPherson, A. (Eds.). (2013). Making Sense of Qualitative Data Analysis. Routledge.
  • Hair, J. F., et al. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson.
  • Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.

Related Assignments