Other Use Case Diagram Shown In Figure A-1f Attached
Othe Use Case Diagram Shown Infigure A 1f Attachedcaptures The Stud
Othe Use Case Diagram Shown Infigure A 1f Attachedcaptures The Stud o The use-case diagram shown in Figure A-1 F (attached) captures the Student billing function but does not contain any function for accepting tuition payment from students. Revise the diagram to capture this functionality. Also, express some common behaviors among two use cases in the revised diagram by using include relationships. o When should you use an Agile method, and when should you use an engineering-based method for developing a system? Support your answer.
Paper For Above instruction
The provided assignment involves two core tasks: first, revising an existing use case diagram related to student billing to include the functionality of accepting tuition payments, and second, discussing the appropriate contexts for utilizing Agile versus engineering-based development methodologies. This paper will explore these tasks in detail, emphasizing the importance of accurate system modeling and choosing the appropriate development approach based on project characteristics.
Revising the Use Case Diagram to Include Tuition Payment Functionality
The initial use case diagram, as described, captures the 'Student Billing' function but lacks the mechanism for processing tuition payments directly from students. In a typical university or educational institution, the process of managing tuition involves several steps, including billing, payment acceptance, and confirmation. To make the diagram comprehensive and reflective of actual operations, it is essential to incorporate a 'Accept Tuition Payment' use case linked to the student actor.
This addition can be represented by connecting the 'Student' actor to a new use case labeled 'Accept Tuition Payment.' The relationship type here is a simple association, indicating that students can perform this action. Furthermore, this use case often shares common behaviors with billing, such as generating payment receipts or updating account balances. To efficiently represent these shared behaviors, the generalized UML include relationship can be used to denote that 'Accept Tuition Payment' includes sub-processes like 'Generate Receipt' or 'Update Student Account,' which may be part of or triggered during the payment process.
In revising the diagram, the following relationships should be added:
- Connect the 'Student' actor to a new use case 'Accept Tuition Payment.'
- Use an include relationship from 'Accept Tuition Payment' to 'Generate Receipt' and 'Update Student Account' to depict shared subprocesses.
- Ensure the diagram accurately reflects the flow of actions and dependencies among use cases.
This revised diagram will provide a clearer picture of how the system interacts with students concerning billing and payments, supporting better system analysis and design.
Distinguishing Between Agile and Engineering-Based Development Methods
The second part of the assignment asks for a discussion on when to adopt Agile methodologies versus engineering-based methods, often referred to as traditional or waterfall approaches.
When to Use Agile Methods
Agile development is best suited for projects requiring flexibility, adaptability, and rapid iterations. It is particularly advantageous in environments where:
- Requirements are expected to evolve based on stakeholder feedback,
- The end-user needs are not fully understood at the outset,
- The project faces technological uncertainties,
- The delivery window is short, necessitating incremental releases, and
- Collaboration among cross-functional teams is critical.
For example, developing a new customer-facing web application with continuously changing features aligns well with Agile practices, enabling quick adjustments based on beta user feedback (Highsmith & Cockburn, 2001).
When to Use Engineering-Based Methods
On the other hand, traditional engineering or waterfall approaches are appropriate in projects with well-defined, stable requirements and where extensive planning is feasible. Such scenarios include:
- Regulatory or safety-critical systems (e.g., aerospace, medical devices),
- Projects with tightly controlled budgets and timelines,
- Environments where changes are costly or impractical during development,
- When comprehensive documentation is necessary for compliance purposes.
For instance, developing an embedded system for an aircraft's control system demands a rigorous engineering process with detailed specifications, thorough testing, and formal validation (Royce, 1970).
Conclusion
In sum, selecting the appropriate development methodology hinges on project-specific factors, including requirements stability, technological uncertainty, regulatory environment, and customer involvement. Agile methods excel in dynamic, exploratory projects, fostering adaptability, collaboration, and iterative delivery. Conversely, engineering-based methods suit projects demanding high predictability, compliance, and thorough documentation, often in safety-critical or highly regulated domains. Understanding these distinctions enables project managers and developers to tailor their approach appropriately, optimizing success and stakeholder satisfaction.
References
Highsmith, J., & Cockburn, A. (2001). Agile Software Development: The Business of Innovation. Computer, 34(9), 120–127.
Royce, W. W. (1970). Managing the Development of Large Software Systems. In Proceedings of IEEE WESCON (pp. 1-9).
Boehm, B. W. (1988). A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement. Computer, 21(5), 61–72.
Larman, C., & Basili, V. R. (2003). Iterative and Incremental Development: A Brief History. Computer, 36(6), 47–56.
Schwaber, K., & Beedle, M. (2002). Agile Software Development with Scrum. Prentice Hall.
Rainer, R. K., & Turban, E. (2008). Introduction to Information Systems. John Wiley & Sons.
Sommerville, I. (2010). Software Engineering. Pearson.
Leffingwell, D. (2007). Agile Software Requirements: Lean Requirements Practices for Teams, Programs, and the Enterprise. Addison-Wesley.
Pressman, R. S. (2010). Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach. McGraw-Hill.