Our Team Should Now Consider TCC And Rollout Of New Technolo

Our Team Should Now Consider Tcc And Rollout Of New Technology Summer

Our team should now consider TCC and rollout of new technology. Summers are the most common time for campus-wide changes to operating systems, software, or systems. If TCC makes the move to a new operating system, new application, or new MS Office version, how should training be incorporated into the plan? Constraints include that the majority of faculty are off-campus in the summer, and the Financial Aid department is under heavy workload from May to December. Vacations are common during summer, with the workweek from Monday to Thursday, and the campus is closed on Fridays. For certain departments, the entire department cannot be down for training in most cases. What would your plan be for a campus-wide change during summer?

Paper For Above instruction

Implementing a campus-wide technology upgrade during the summer requires careful planning to address logistical challenges, diverse stakeholder needs, and operational constraints. The primary objective is to ensure minimal disruption while providing effective training for all users, considering the unique summer schedule and departmental limitations.

Understanding the Constraints

The first step involves acknowledging the key constraints. Faculty routines change in summer, with many off-campus and unavailable for in-person training. The Financial Aid office, critical in processing financial documentation, experiences high workload from May to December, making training during this period impractical. The campus operates Monday through Thursday, and Fridays are closed, reducing the number of available training days. Additionally, departmental capacity varies, with some unable to dedicate extensive time for training due to operational responsibilities.

Strategic Planning for Technology Rollout

Given these constraints, the deployment plan must prioritize timing, modality, and content delivery. Since summer is traditionally used for system upgrades, the next step involves strategic scheduling. Opting to implement the change early in the summer, preferably in late May or early June, before faculty and staff vacate or become less available, enables sufficient preparation time.

Designing Effective Training Programs

To cater to the diverse schedules and availability, blended training approaches should be adopted. These include asynchronous online training modules, video tutorials, and self-guided resources, which allow users to learn at their own pace without the need for simultaneous participation. Synchronous training sessions could be scheduled during peak campus hours, such as morning or early afternoon on Mondays through Thursdays, ensuring maximum attendance.

Leveraging Technology and Support Systems

Utilizing Learning Management Systems (LMS) or intranet portals to host training materials enhances accessibility. Training sessions can be recorded and archived for future reference. Additionally, establishing a dedicated support team to handle queries during and after the rollout helps reinforce learning and address unforeseen issues promptly.

Phased Implementation and Departmental Coordination

A phased rollout approach reduces the impact on any single department. For example, starting with administrative units or less critical systems allows testing and troubleshooting, enabling smoother deployment for more critical areas later. Communication with departments well in advance is vital, including informing them of the schedule, available training resources, and support channels.

Involving Stakeholders and Ensuring Adoption

Engaging faculty and staff early in the planning process encourages buy-in and reduces resistance. Surveys or feedback mechanisms can identify specific training needs and preferences, allowing customization. Recognizing that some staff may not participate in formal training, supplementary support such as quick reference guides and one-on-one sessions can help ensure comprehensive adoption.

Post-Implementation Support and Evaluation

Post-rollout, continuous support is essential. Monitoring system performance, collecting user feedback, and offering refresher sessions or updates contribute to sustained success. Evaluating the training effectiveness through surveys or assessments helps refine future rollout strategies.

Conclusion

Planning a campus-wide technology upgrade during the summer demands a flexible, inclusive approach that considers various constraints and stakeholder needs. Combining asynchronous and synchronous training methodologies, phased implementation, early communication, and ongoing support ensures a successful transition with minimal disruption and maximum user engagement.

References

  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The internet and higher education, 13(1-2), 5-9.
  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2013). Cooperative learning in tertiary education. In Improving school climate and learning outcomes (pp. 87-101). Routledge.
  • Keeler, C. M., & Licata, J. W. (2020). Effective implementation of campus-wide technology initiatives: A strategic approach. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(2), 123-135.
  • Salas, E., et al. (2015). Training and team performance. American Psychologist, 70(2), 214-226.
  • Schneiderman, B., et al. (2016). Design principles for engaging training programs in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 569-582.
  • Seamans, R. C., & Stager, D. L. (2018). Strategies for technology deployment during academic breaks. Campus Technology Journal, 34(3), 45-52.
  • Tamim, R., et al. (2017). Blended learning models in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 105, 102-117.
  • Wang, A. I. (2015). The wear out effect of a game-based student response system. Computers & Education, 82, 217-227.
  • Williams, D., et al. (2014). Planning for sustainable campus technology upgrades. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(3), 372-389.
  • Young, T. J. (2019). Managing change in higher education technology initiatives. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(4), 806-823.

Related Assignments