Outline The Differences Between Hoarding Power And Encourage

Outline The Differences Between Hoarding Power And Encouraging2 E

Outline the differences between Hoarding power and Encouraging. Explain about the power of Congruency in Leadership.

Paper For Above instruction

Leadership styles and their implications profoundly influence organizational dynamics, employee motivation, and overall effectiveness. Among these styles, hoarding power and encouraging leadership stand in stark contrast, reflecting divergent philosophies on authority, empowerment, and interpersonal influence. Hoarding power involves monopolizing control and withholding decision-making authority, which can create a climate of dependency and restrict organizational agility. Conversely, encouraging leadership fosters an environment of trust, collaboration, and shared responsibility, empowering employees to contribute actively to organizational goals.

Hoarding power often manifests as centralized decision-making, limited delegation, and an authoritarian approach. Leaders who hoard power tend to retain authority to themselves, viewing their control as essential to maintaining order or asserting dominance. This approach can stifle innovation, diminish employee engagement, and inhibit organizational growth. It may also foster a culture of fear or compliance rather than commitment. In contrast, encouraging leadership emphasizes the importance of shared power, open communication, and employee development. Such leaders trust their team members’ judgment and capabilities, encouraging input, participation, and ownership of tasks.

The differences between these two styles extend to their impact on organizational performance and employee morale. Hoarding power can lead to bottlenecks, decreased motivation, and risk aversion, as employees may feel disempowered or second-guessed. Encouraging leadership, on the other hand, often results in higher job satisfaction, increased innovation, and more adaptable organizations, as employees feel valued and capable of making meaningful contributions.

Furthermore, the power of congruency in leadership underscores the significance of alignment between a leader’s words, actions, and core values. Congruent leaders demonstrate integrity and consistency, reinforcing trust and credibility. This congruency amplifies positive influence and motivates followers, fostering a cohesive organizational culture. When leaders endorse encouraging behaviors—such as transparency, empowerment, and ethical integrity—these traits become embedded in the organizational climate, encouraging similar behaviors among employees. Conversely, leaders who hoard power may send conflicting signals—professing openness yet acting authoritarian—undermining trust and coherence within the organization.

In conclusion, adopting an encouraging leadership style grounded in the principles of trust, empowerment, and congruency can significantly enhance organizational health and effectiveness. While hoarding power may offer short-term control, it risks long-term stagnation and disengagement. Leaders who align their actions with their values and foster shared authority contribute to a resilient, innovative, and motivated workforce.

References

• Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power & Greatness. Paulist Press.
• Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The Leadership Challenge: How to Make Extraordinary Things Happen in Organizations. Jossey-Bass.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic Leadership Development: Getting to the Root of Positive Forms of Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338.
• Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Liao, C., & Meuser, J. D. (2014). Servant Leadership and Servant Marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 22(2), 135–165.
• Ciulla, J. B. (2004). Ethics and Leadership Effectiveness. The Nature of Leadership, 1(3), 385–402.
• Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic Leadership: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126.
• Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. (2014). Instrumental Leadership: Measurement and Extension of Transformational–Transactional Leadership Theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), 746–771.