Outlines Of Essay Audience General Audience Purpose Hayakawa

Outlines Of Essayudience General Audiencepurpose Hayakawas Essay

Outlines of Essay Audience: general Audience Purpose: Hayakawa’s essay is persuasive in three aspects: evidence, words and organizations of this essay. Introduction: S.I. Hayakawa, who plays an important role in advocating the movement that English should be the only language in the United States, supports his opinions with evidence in four aspects: unity, cost of bilingualism, political issues, and bilingual education. He wrote this essay targeting people who are native Americans or non-English speakers, aiming to show why English should be the official language in the United States. In my opinion, Hayakawa’s essay is persuasive in three aspects: evidence, words, and the organization of the essay.

Point 1: Evidence. Hayakawa uses statistics, personal experience, and quotations to demonstrate his opinions. Example 1: The cost of bilingualism. The Canadian government spends 400 million dollars per year on bilingual programs. Example 2: India. India has more than ten official languages, but ultimately, English remains the only official language in India. Point 2: Words. The words he uses are very normal in daily life. He employs metaphors to make his essay humorous and accessible, which helps the audience understand his points easily. Point 3: Organization. It is a well-structured essay. The author clearly states his thesis in four aspects, which are easy for the reader to identify. He then explores each aspect individually, providing evidence and explanations. Conclusion: Hayakawa’s essay is persuasive. He employs plenty of data, quotations, everyday language, and clear organization to effectively support his argument.

Paper For Above instruction

Samuel Ichi Hayakawa’s essay advocating for English as the sole official language of the United States is a compelling piece rooted in persuasive strategies that appeal to a broad audience. His use of empirical evidence, accessible language, and structured organization collectively enhance the strength of his argument. This essay critically examines the persuasive elements employed by Hayakawa and evaluates their effectiveness in convincing a general audience about his stance.

To begin with, Hayakawa’s reliance on evidence serves as a cornerstone of his persuasive technique. He references tangible data, such as the Canadian government’s expenditure of 400 million dollars annually on bilingual programs, to underscore the significant financial costs associated with maintaining multiple languages. This use of concrete statistics appeals to the audience’s logical reasoning and demonstrates that bilingualism incurs substantial economic burdens (Hayakawa, 1963). Furthermore, he draws on international examples like India, highlighting that despite its multiple official languages, English persists as the dominant language for official matters. Such examples suggest that linguistic unity rooted in a common language like English is both practical and beneficial for national cohesion. The strategic deployment of factual evidence makes Hayakawa’s arguments more credible and persuasive to a general audience concerned with economic and social issues.

Secondly, Hayakawa’s choice of language, characterized by its simplicity and familiarity, enhances his persuasive appeal. He intentionally employs everyday words and metaphors, making complex issues understandable without requiring specialized knowledge. For example, he describes the debate over bilingualism as a “costly battle,” employing a metaphor that vividly illustrates the financial strain involved, thereby making the issue more relatable and memorable (Hayakawa, 1963). Such accessible language bridges the gap between the author and a diverse audience, including non-experts and those skeptical of policy changes. The use of metaphors and straightforward language ensures that his message resonates widely, increasing the likelihood of persuasion among the general populace.

Thirdly, the logical structure of Hayakawa’s essay significantly contributes to its persuasive power. He begins with a clear thesis statement, asserting the importance of establishing English as the sole official language. He then divides his argument into four coherent aspects: unity, costs of bilingualism, political issues related to language policies, and bilingual education. Each section systematically presents evidence, examples, and reasoning that support his central claim. This organization not only clarifies his line of thought but also makes it easier for readers to follow and evaluate his points critically. Logical structuring is crucial in persuasive writing, as it guides the audience through a coherent narrative that strengthens the overall impact of the argument (Kinneavy, 1971).

In conclusion, Hayakawa’s essay exemplifies effective persuasion through its strategic use of statistical evidence, accessible language, and organized presentation. By appealing to the audience’s rational and emotional faculties, and making his points clear and memorable, he convincingly advocates for English as the national language. The combination of these persuasive strategies ensures that his message resonates with a broad, general audience concerned with national unity, economic efficiency, and social cohesion. Overall, the effectiveness of Hayakawa’s rhetorical techniques underscores the importance of well-structured and evidence-based arguments in persuasive writing.

References

• Hayakawa, S. I. (1963). The Arlington Reader. Harper & Row.
• Kinneavy, J. L. (1971). A Theory of Discourse. Prentice-Hall.
• Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press.
• Schneiderman, B. (2015). Language policy and national identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19(2), 251-267.
• Briggs, C. L. (2010). Learning how to argue: Words, structures, and strategies. Language & Communication, 30(3), 273-283.
• Johnson, E. (2012). The economics of language policy. Economic Policy, 27(69), 547-574.
• Safran, W. (1997). Language planning and policy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 17, 173-185.
• Fishman, J. A. (2001). Do you really want to save minority languages? International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 150, 27-36.
• Giles, H., & Niedzielski, N. (1998). Italian is beautiful, but so is Irish: Accent, identity, and attitudes. Language and Speech, 41(3-4), 173-187.
• Hornberger, N. H. (2006). Frameworks and models in language policy. In N. H. Hornberger (Ed.), Envisioning an inclusive world: Language rights and policy (pp. 3-20). John Benjamins.