Overview: Keep In Mind The Speed Of Technology And Science
Overview Keep In Mind The Speed At Which Technology And Science Chang
Explain “The Principle of Legality" and comment on whether it is just or not just for those who are the first to commit a new crime to not be prosecuted.
Contrast the “Theories of Criminal Punishment” and explain which one you identify with.
We are at an unprecedented time, when almost everyone has access to a cell phone or other electronic devices capable of recording audio and video and instantly uploading it to the internet or sending it to the media. Recordings of crimes are often seen by the masses within minutes of the incident. How does that reconcile with the “Presumption of Innocence” that every defendant is supposed to be entitled to?
Paper For Above instruction
The rapid evolution of technology and science profoundly impacts the criminal justice system, especially concerning legal principles and ethical considerations surrounding new forms of crime. The Principle of Legality, a cornerstone of criminal law, asserts that individuals can only be prosecuted if their conduct was defined as criminal at the time it occurred. This principle aims to prevent ex post facto laws and ensure fairness in prosecution. When considering the justice of prosecuting the first individual to commit a newly defined crime, it raises complex ethical questions. On one hand, enforcing laws retroactively could undermine the confidence in the legal system, while on the other hand, the principle of fairness suggests that individuals should not be penalized for acts that were not legally recognized as criminal at the time of commission. Therefore, prosecuting the first offender should arguably require clear statutes and perhaps a grace period to adapt to emerging criminal behaviors, especially in the face of rapid technological development.
Regarding the theories of criminal punishment, they essentially fall into several paradigms: utilitarianism, retributivism, and rehabilitation. Utilitarianism advocates for punishment as a means to deter future crimes and protect society, emphasizing outcomes that maximize social welfare. Retributivism, on the other hand, focuses on moral justice, asserting that offenders deserve punishment proportionate to their crimes regardless of future benefits. Rehabilitation aims to reform offenders, addressing underlying causes to prevent recidivism. Personally, I align most with the rehabilitative theory because it promotes moral and social improvement, recognizing that many offenders have underlying issues that, if treated, can lead to successful reintegration into society.
The prevalence of recording devices and instant sharing on social media has created a new dynamic in criminal justice. The ability to capture real-time events and disseminate them broadly influences public perception, often portraying incidents before investigations have concluded. This technological shift challenges the traditional presumption of innocence, which holds that every defendant is innocent until proven guilty. While recordings can support justice by holding perpetrators accountable, they also risk premature judgments and the potential for misinformation. The widespread availability of evidence may lead to a 'trial by media,' where public opinion influences the perception of guilt. Balancing the rights of the accused with the public’s right to information requires a cautious approach, ensuring that media coverage does not undermine the legal process or violate the respondent’s rights to a fair trial.
References
- Bohm, R. M. (2017). Introduction to criminal justice. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Finkel, M., & Shapiro, A. (2020). The evolution of criminal law in the digital age. Journal of Law & Technology, 34(2), 123-145.
- Hart, H. L. A. (2018). The concept of law. Oxford University Press.
- Pratt, J. (2017). Punishment and civilization. Sage Publications.
- Resnik, J. (2019). The principle of legality and criminal justice. Law and Philosophy, 38(3), 263-292.
- Siddiqi, S. (2021). Technology and crime: Challenges and opportunities for law enforcement. International Journal of Cyber Security, 13(4), 225-240.
- Tonry, M. (2015). Punishment and politics: Evidence and enlightenment in industrial societies. Oxford University Press.
- Walker, S., et al. (2019). Theoretical perspectives on punishment. Criminal Justice Ethics, 38(4), 251-269.
- Williams, P. (2018). Digital evidence in criminal investigations. Law Enforcement Journal, 45(6), 44-49.
- Zedner, L. (2020). Security. Routledge.