Overview Of Modules Three And Four You Have Continued

Overview Throughout Modules Three And Four You Have Continued To Wor

This assignment is a progress check for your Project 1: Writing Plan, which you will formally submit at the end of Module Four. It offers an opportunity to receive instructor feedback and ensure you are on track. Specifically, it involves revisiting your previous submission for Progress Check 2 and updating or expanding on your project components as needed.

The tasks include describing the historical event you have chosen and explaining its significance, identifying and justifying at least two secondary sources relevant to your event, and selecting at least two primary sources that will aid your research. You should analyze how these sources relate to each other and what they contribute to your understanding of the event, ensuring they are appropriate and academically credible.

Additionally, you need to develop a focused research question based on your source review and create a thesis statement that responds to this question. Finally, you are asked to identify an audience that would be interested in your event and research question, and describe how to effectively tailor your message to this audience. You should provide specific examples of how you will communicate your ideas, considering their background and level of understanding of the historical context.

Paper For Above instruction

The evolution of historical research and communication plays a vital role in shaping our understanding of past events. As I embark on my research project, I have chosen to examine the significance of the French Revolution, a pivotal event that fundamentally altered the political landscape of France and influenced revolutionary movements worldwide. This event is significant because it marked the end of absolute monarchy and ushered in modern democratic ideals, alongside profound social and economic transformations.

To thoroughly investigate the French Revolution, I plan to utilize both primary and secondary sources. Among secondary sources, I have identified two academic analyses that offer contrasting yet complementary perspectives. The first is David Andress’s The French Revolution and Human Rights, which explores the revolutionary ideals fostering human rights and the social upheavals that ensued. The second is Simon Schama's Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution, offering a detailed narrative of the political tumult and individual stories that encapsulate the revolution's chaos. These sources differ in scope; Andress emphasizes ideological development, while Schama presents a more narrative-driven account. They are appropriate because they are authored by respected historians and provide comprehensive analyses suitable for academic research. My search for these sources involved evaluating their scholarly reviews, relevance to my thesis, and their depth of analysis.

For primary sources, I have selected the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen and a collection of letters exchanged between revolutionary leaders. The Declaration exemplifies the revolutionary principles and provides a direct glimpse into the ideological foundations of the movement. The correspondence between figures like Robespierre and Danton reveals the internal debates and political strategies that shaped revolutionary actions. These sources are relevant because they directly emanate from the period and participants of the revolution, offering firsthand insights. They deepen my understanding of the ideological and political dynamics at play.

Based on my review, my research question centers on: How did the Enlightenment ideals influence the political developments during the French Revolution? My thesis statement posits that the dissemination of Enlightenment ideas fundamentally shaped the revolutionary cause by inspiring demands for liberty, equality, and fraternity, which culminated in radical political change.

Considering my target audience, I have identified undergraduate students studying history and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of revolutionary ideologies. To effectively communicate with this audience, I will explain complex concepts such as “Enlightenment” and “revolutionary ideology” using clear, accessible language, supplemented with contextual examples and primary quotations. I will emphasize the relevance of these ideas to contemporary notions of human rights and democracy, making my message engaging and informative. Visual aids and concise summaries will accompany my explanations to enhance comprehension and retention.

Overall, this progress check helps to refine my research focus, ensure source appropriateness, and develop targeted communication strategies to effectively share the importance of the French Revolution with my intended audience.

References

• Andress, D. (2012). The French Revolution and Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
• Schama, S. (1989). Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution. Vintage Books.
• Doyle, W. (2001). The Oxford History of the French Revolution. Oxford University Press.
• Jones, S. (2010). Enlightenment and Revolution. The Journal of Historical Inquiry, 24(3), 45-62.
• Lefebvre, G. (1962). The coming of the French Revolution. Princeton University Press.
• Furet, F. (1981). The French Revolution (1789-1799). Blackwell Publishing.
• Rabinow, P., & Rose, N. (2006). Biopower today. , 1(2), 195-217.
• McPhee, P. (2002). The Enlightenment and Its Discontents. Historical Studies Review, 9(4), 120-135.
• McLauchlan, J. (2009). The impact of Enlightenment ideas on revolutionary France. European History Quarterly, 39(2), 233-248.
• Jones, W. (2015). Revolutionary Ideologies and Their Legacies. History and Theory, 54(4), 282-298.