Overview Of Peer Review In Module 3 Reflection Assignment

Overview Peer Reviewin The Module 3 Reflection Assignment You Will R

Overview: Peer Review In the Module 3 Reflection Assignment, you will reflect upon what you have learned about Peer Review Committee processes and Texas Board of Nursing rules as you consider the actions of fictitious nurses and committee members in scenarios. REMEMBER, YOU ARE USING THE TEXAS BOARD OF NURSING RULES, NOT THE STATE YOU LIVE IN. Please use the link provided in the assignment for the Texas BON Rule 217.16. ALSO, THERE ARE 2 PARTS TO THIS ASSIGNMENT. PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU COMPLETE BOTH PARTS.

Refer to your course readings and lectures as you complete the assignment. Performance Objectives: · Apply the Minor Incident Rule to specific incidents. · Describe the due process protections for a nurse who is peer-reviewed. Rubric Use this rubric to guide your work on the assignment, “Peer Review.†Task Accomplished Proficient Needs Improvement Part 1 (a) Applying Rule 217.16(h) Minor Incidents Read the following scenario and then answer the questions that follow: You are on your hospital’s Peer Review Committee (PRC). You are reviewing Nurse A’s practice. She works on the pediatric unit. In the past, Nurse A has practiced safely without incidents. However, four months ago, Nurse A gave immunizations to five pediatric patients (3 months, 9 months, 2 years, 4 years, and 5 years of age). She used a vial of Hepatitis B vaccine that had been expired for 30 days but still was being stored in the unit refrigerator. She gave the five immunizations within a few minutes of each other, and she got the vial from the refrigerator only once (i.e., She did not take it out and replace it five times). She took responsibility for the errors when she was informed by her unit manager. Should Nurse A be reported to the BON? Let’s review what deems a minor vs. a reportable (NOT minor) incident- A minor incident is- 217.16(a)- as defined under the Texas Nursing Practice Act, Texas Occupations Code §301.401(2), means conduct by a nurse that may be a violation of the Texas Nursing Practice Act or a Board rule but does not indicate the nurse's continued practice poses a risk of harm to a patient or another person. A reportable incident is- 217.16(h)- conduct that falls outside of the definition of a minor incident and must be reported to a PRC or BON. Apply the Minor Incident Rule to reach and support your decision. This Rule 217.16 can be found at Use this specific link only- it is the official updated Texas Board of Nursing information. Click on the link and scroll down to the bottom to find the letter (h), where criteria are listed that describes actions that must be reported to the Peer Review Committee or BON. Criteria. In the first column of the table, list the 5 criteria as it appears in the rule that are essential in determining if an incident is a reportable action. All 5 must be listed for full credit. Then, in the second column, record your explanation as to why or why not the nurse’s actions deem it reportable and therefore harmful to a patient. Criteria that determine an incident is reportable Rule 217.16(h) Explanation of whether or not Nurse A’s actions are minor vs. reportable Criteria : 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part 1: (b) Report vs. Not Report Based on the Rule 217.16(h) criteria you listed above, would you report Nurse A to the Board? Please explain why or why not. At least 3 substantial sentences are needed for full credit.: (Explain below) Part 2: Applying Rule 217.19 Incident-Based Peer Review Read the following scenario and then reflect upon the actions it portrays.: Last month, the chairperson of your hospital’s Peer Review Committee (PRC) passed you in the hallway and said, “I’m glad I ran into you. You’re going to be peer-reviewed.†The chairperson continued, saying, “Your manager found out that you called the Texas Department of State Health Services two months ago and reported that LVNs were being allowed to do the complete initial assessment on patients. Also, you made some medication errors over the past couple of months. I’ll let you know when the meeting is to occur.†You heard nothing more about the PRC meeting. Today, the chairperson came to you and told you that you had been reported to the Texas Board of Nursing. She said, “It was just felt by the work group that you are a troublemaker and lack the skills to practice due to your med errors. I’m also giving you a ‘heads up’ that you are going to be put on suspension for at least three days by your unit manager.†Applying Rule 217.19, what violations of the rule occurred in the above scenario? First, review your learning about incident-based peer review. In the first column of the table, list any 4 criteria from Rule 217.19 that were violated (there are more than 4 to choose from). - In the second column, explain how each criterion was violated. All 4 boxes must be completed for full credit. Please use the link provided at Which part of the rule was violated? (Subsection number and letter OR descriptive phrase) (Rule 217.19) Explanation of violation ( from the 4 criteria above): 1. 2. 3. 4.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment requires a comprehensive reflection and application of Texas Board of Nursing rules related to peer review and incident reporting. It involves analyzing a scenario about Nurse A and deciding if her actions constitute a minor or reportable incident based on Rule 217.16. Additionally, it necessitates evaluating a case where a nurse faces peer review due to alleged medication errors and reporting behavior, applying Rule 217.19 to identify violations of peer review procedures. Throughout this task, an understanding of due process rights, incident classification, and proper peer review protocols is essential, supported by citing relevant rules and scholarly sources.

In Part 1, the first scenario involves Nurse A, who administered immunizations using an expired hepatitis B vaccine stored in the refrigerator. To determine whether her actions should be reported to the BON, it is crucial to examine the criteria outlined in Texas Board of Nursing Rule 217.16(h). This rule specifies conditions that, when met, classify incidents as reportable rather than minor. The five essential criteria include: (1) conduct that results in or has the potential to result in patient harm; (2) violations that compromise patient safety; (3) actions involving illegal or unprofessional conduct; (4) breaches of confidentiality or privacy; and (5) incidents that involve violations of nursing laws or rules that could result in discipline. Applying these criteria, the use of an expired vaccine raises questions about whether it posed a risk of harm or was a breach of safety standards. Given that the nurse took responsibility after the incident was identified, and considering the vaccine's expiration, the key aspect is whether administering an expired vaccine constitutes a reportable incident. According to Texas BON rules, administering an expired vaccine can be considered a minor incident if it does not pose ongoing risk and was promptly acknowledged and rectified. Therefore, Nurse A's actions are likely deemed a minor incident, not requiring reporting to the BON, provided the vaccine did not cause harm.

In Part 2, the second scenario involves a nurse who was subjected to peer review following reports of medication errors and reporting staffing violations. The peer review process was initiated after the nurse's manager reported concerns about medication errors and a conversation about reporting violations. The violations of Rule 217.19 occurred when the chairperson and peer review group failed to uphold the principles of incident-based peer review, including fairness, due process, and appropriate documentation. Specifically, four violations include: (1) failure to provide proper notice of peer review to the nurse; (2) conducting a peer review without sufficient evidence or proper investigation; (3) retaliating against the nurse for reporting issues, which violates protections against retaliatory actions under peer review protocols; and (4) unjust suspension or disciplinary action without following established procedures. These violations undermine the integrity of the peer review process and violate the nurse's due process rights, emphasizing the importance of transparent, fair, and objective procedures during peer review according to Rule 217.19.

References

  • Texas Board of Nursing. (2021). Rules and regulations relating to nursing. https://www.bon.texas.gov/laws_and_rules/rules_and_regulations.html
  • American Nurses Association. (2015). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. ANA Publishing.
  • Peplau, H. E. (1997). Interpersonal relations in nursing: A conceptual framework. Springer Publishing.
  • Gordon, M. (2012). Nursing process: Assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation, evaluation. Elsevier Health Sciences.
  • Brown, S., & Smith, J. (2019). Legal and ethical issues in nursing. Journal of Nursing Law, 23(4), 123-132.
  • Johnson, M. (2018). Patient safety and quality improvement in nursing practice. Nursing Times, 115(3), 45-50.
  • Schmitt, M. (2020). Ensuring due process in nurse peer reviews. Nurse Legal Reference, 17(2), 75-80.
  • Reed, P. G. (2017). Ethical aspects of nursing peer review. Nursing Ethics, 24(7), 863-874.
  • Texas BON. (2022). Overview of the State’s rules regarding nurse discipline. https://www.bon.texas.gov/discipline/discipline_overview.asp
  • Evans, M. (2016). Clinical decision-making in nursing: A practical guide. Springer Publishing.

Related Assignments