Overview: This Assignment Will Give You The Opportunity

Overview this Assignment Will Give You The Opportuni

This assignment will give you the opportunity to choose a case study and then write about the ethical implications and the impact of the events described. You are to select either Case Study 9.1: Unprofessional Conduct or Case Study 8.4: Have Gun Will Travel. Your response should analyze the questions associated with your chosen case, using concepts learned in the course to support your discussion. For each question, provide your rationale for your answers, demonstrating critical thinking and understanding of ethical principles.

The paper should be between four to six pages in length, typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font size 12, with one-inch margins on all sides. A cover page must be included, containing the title of the assignment, your name, your professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page does not count toward the page requirement.

Your assignment must cite your textbook as a reference and include a separate references page. All citations and references should adhere to APA formatting standards. The reference page is not included in the required page length.

Paper For Above instruction

Choosing between Case Study 9.1: Unprofessional Conduct and Case Study 8.4: Have Gun Will Travel, I selected the latter due to its intriguing implications on professional integrity and workplace safety. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the ethical issues presented in the case and assesses their broader impact within organizational and societal contexts, leveraging key ethical theories to support the discussion.

In the case of "Have Gun Will Travel," the primary concern revolves around the ethical implications of individuals carrying firearms in the workplace, which raises questions about safety, personal rights, and organizational policies. The first question involves examining whether allowing firearms on premises aligns with the company's ethical obligations to ensure employee safety. From a utilitarian perspective, policies should maximize overall safety and well-being, suggesting that prohibiting guns could reduce risks of violence. Kantian ethics, however, emphasize respecting individuals as ends, which might support policies that respect personal rights, including gun ownership, provided they do not harm others. Virtue ethics consider the moral character involved in creating a safe versus a rights-based environment, emphasizing virtues like prudence and responsibility.

The second question addresses whether employers should implement strict policies banning firearms, considering legal rights versus ethical duties. Legally, employees may have rights to bear arms, but ethically, organizations have a duty to create a secure workplace. Ethically, the utilitarian approach favors policies that prevent harm; thus, banning guns aligns with protecting the majority's safety. Kantian ethics would argue that policies should respect individual autonomy but also uphold societal safety as an imperative. Virtue ethics would favor policies that demonstrate prudence and moral responsibility, thereby reducing potential harm.

A third focal point concerns the implications of such policies on workplace culture and employee morale. Ethical leadership necessitates creating an environment of trust and safety. Policies that ban firearms could foster a culture of safety and collective responsibility, reinforcing virtues like trustworthiness and caring. Conversely, allowing guns may promote a culture of individual rights but potentially increase tension and fear. From the perspective of ethical theories, balancing these considerations requires evaluating the virtues most aligned with the organization’s values.

In conclusion, analyzing the ethical implications of firearm policies in the workplace through utilitarian, Kantian, and virtue ethics approaches illuminates the complex dilemmas faced by organizations. Prioritizing safety and moral responsibility appears to align most closely with ethical best practices, suggesting that organizations should carefully consider policies that protect employees while respecting individual rights within a framework of prudence and moral virtue.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
• Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2021). Business ethics: Ethical decision making & cases (12th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Johnson, C. E. (2020). Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. (H. J. Paton, Trans.). Harper & Row, 1964.
• Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn, West Strand.
• Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
• Schneider, M. (2014). Workplace firearm policies and safety: Ethical considerations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(2), 165-192.
• Schmidt, R. (2019). Ethical management of workplace safety and security issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 154, 45-58.
• Stark, A. (2016). Virtue ethics in organizational decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 135, 25-37.
• Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Harvard University Press.