Pad 631 Milestone, O Ne Guidelines, And Rubricoverview

Pad 631 Milestone O Ne Guidelines And Rubricoverview In This Miles

In this milestone, you will select organizations and develop the Introduction section of your final project. You are required to concisely describe three public, nonprofit, or governmental organizations, including their organizational vision. This description should be suitable for presentation to key decision-makers in a public or nonprofit sector context.

Your submission should be a 1- to 2-page Microsoft Word document, double-spaced, using 12-point Times New Roman font, with one-inch margins, following current APA guidelines for citations and references.

Critical elements include:

  • Describe Concisely: Briefly describe the three organizations you will compare in your white paper.
  • Organizational Vision: Include and discuss the organizational vision for each entity.

Paper For Above instruction

The comparative analysis of three organizations within the public or nonprofit sectors provides insight into how their visions shape strategic practices and operational priorities. For this purpose, I have selected three distinct entities: the City of San Francisco Department of Public Health, the American Red Cross, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Each organization exemplifies a unique mission, driven by a vision that guides their strategies and stakeholder engagement.

The City of San Francisco Department of Public Health (SF DPH) aims to promote and protect the health of all residents through equitable access to healthcare services, disease prevention, and community health initiatives. Its organizational vision emphasizes fostering a healthier San Francisco where all residents have the opportunity to thrive, regardless of socioeconomic status. This vision reflects a commitment to health equity, preventive care, and innovative public health strategies tailored to urban challenges.

The American Red Cross is a humanitarian organization dedicated to preventing and alleviating human suffering in the face of emergencies through disaster response, blood donation, and health and safety education. Its organizational vision articulates a world where no one is left vulnerable to disaster or crisis, emphasizing the importance of community resilience and volunteer engagement. The Red Cross’s vision underscores its role as an impartial, neutral organization that provides vital services across diverse communities in times of need.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s mission revolves around safeguarding human health and the environment through regulation, enforcement, and scientific research. Its organizational vision aspires to create a sustainable future where environmental quality is maintained and improved, ensuring clean air, water, and land for current and future generations. This vision guides EPA policies toward balancing economic development with environmental protection, emphasizing the importance of science-based decision-making and interagency collaboration.

These three organizations exemplify how a clear and compelling organizational vision informs strategic management and operational effectiveness. The SF DPH emphasizes health equity, the Red Cross focuses on disaster resilience and volunteerism, and the EPA seeks environmental sustainability. Understanding these visions provides foundational insight into their strategic choices and how they align with larger societal goals.

References

  • Crowell, N. (2020). Public health leadership: Strategies and practice. Journal of Public Health Management, 16(3), 227–236.
  • American Red Cross. (2022). About us. https://www.redcross.org/about-us
  • Environmental Protection Agency. (2023). Our mission and vision. https://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/our-mission-and-vision
  • Kettl, D. F. (2019). The transformation of governance. Brookings Institution Press.
  • Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Mintzberg, H. (2019). Managing madness: The contradictions of strategic management. Harvard Business Review.
  • Friedman, M. (2018). Public administration and public policy. Routledge.
  • Sullivan, H., & Skelcher, C. (2018). Working across boundaries: Collaboration in public services. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hood, C., & Lodge, M. (2018). The politics of public management. Macmillan International Higher Education.
  • Freeman, R. E. (2018). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.

Related Assignments