Padm 530 Public Administrator Generated Information On Econo

Padm 530public Administrator Generated Information On Economic Develop

You are to select one of three options for data collection concerning the economic status of your jurisdiction. The assignment involves exploring insights from individuals with expertise in economic development, assessing values and conflicts of interest during the process, and gaining understanding of contexts and variables affecting community initiatives. You will produce an academic presentation based on your chosen method—interviewing professionals, reviewing public sector data, or integrating both qualitative and quantitative data—with embedded audio and formatted according to specific instructions.

Paper For Above instruction

In the field of public administration, understanding the dynamics of economic development within a community is vital for effective governance and strategic planning. This paper explores three distinct methods for collecting and analyzing data related to economic development in a specific jurisdiction, emphasizing the importance of firsthand insights, comprehensive data review, and the integration of qualitative and quantitative information to inform policy and decision-making.

Option 1: Interviewing Community Economic Development Stakeholders

The first approach involves conducting in-depth interviews with two individuals actively engaged in sectors influencing community economic development, such as city managers, economic development directors, or members of chambers of commerce. Selecting interviewees from the same community as the case study enhances the relevance and immediacy of insights gathered. Prior to each interview, a series of 10–15 carefully prepared questions should be devised to explore various facets of economic development, including local planning impacts, strategic approaches, business influence, human resource contributions, implementation challenges, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats, and leadership traits pertinent to public administration in this sphere.

The interviews can be carried out in person or via videoconferencing tools like Skype. Ensuring proper audio recording equipment is essential, with test runs prior to the actual interview to guarantee clarity. Each interview should last approximately 30 minutes, and the recordings must be embedded into a PowerPoint presentation. A brief biography of each interviewee, along with logistical details such as time, place, and setting, should precede the interview content, providing context for the viewer and emphasizing the firsthand nature of the data collected.

This method offers rich, qualitative data directly from practitioners, providing perspectives on community strengths, challenges, and opportunities through personal experiences and expert opinions. It also allows for capturing nuanced insights into leadership qualities and strategic considerations unique to the community context.

Option 2: Reviewing Public Sector Data and Developing a PowerPoint Presentation

The second option entails conducting an exhaustive review of available public sector-generated data relevant to the community’s economic development status. This approach requires analyzing indicators such as local development reports, city council meeting minutes, economic reports, and media sources. The goal is to synthesize these data points into a comprehensive presentation aligned with guiding questions about local planning processes, strategic approaches, business impacts, human resources, implementation steps, leadership traits, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats to economic growth.

The resulting PowerPoint presentation should include a title slide, overview, and conclusion, with embedded audio narrations corresponding to each slide. A minimum of seven to ten credible sources—including local news outlets, official reports, and interviews—must be cited in APA format on a dedicated references slide. The presentation should be between 20 and 30 minutes in length, providing an in-depth analysis of the community’s economic development landscape based solely on empirical data rather than qualitative interviews.

Option 3: Combining Interview Data with Public Sector Data

The third approach merges qualitative data from a single interview with a public administrator with quantitative data reviewing community indicators. This combined method enables a holistic understanding of the community’s economic development status, reflecting both personal insights and statistical evidence. Conducting an interview with a relevant individual—such as a city manager, economic development director, or chamber of commerce leader—offers firsthand perspectives on community strengths, opportunities, and challenges.

Prior to the interview, prepare 10–15 questions similar to those in Option 1. The interview can take place in person or via videoconference, with audio recordings used solely for educational purposes in the presentation. Post-interview, develop a PowerPoint with 12–15 slides that synthesize interview insights and official data sources, including at least four references beyond the interview itself. Each slide should have an accompanying audio narration, and the entire presentation must be between 20 and 30 minutes long.

This integrated approach facilitates understanding of economic development through both anecdotal and empirical lenses, enriching analysis through triangulation of multiple data types and sources.

References

• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456.
• Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class and How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community, and Everyday Life. Basic Books.
• Kettl, D. F. (2015). The Next Government of the United States: Why Our Institutions Fail Us and How to Fix Them. Norton & Company.
• Noble, J. S. (2010). Community Economic Development: Strategies for Success. Routledge.
• Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press.
• Schendel, D. (2008). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases. Pearson Education.
• United States Census Bureau. (2022). Local Area Economic Data and Indicators. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov
• World Bank. (2021). World Development Indicators. Retrieved from https://databank.worldbank.org
• Wilson, W. (2018). Effective Local Economic Development Strategies. Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(2), 215–230.
• Zeigler, W. (2017). Community Development in Practice. Routledge.