Page 1 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline 2

Page 1 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outlineassessment 2 Infor

Your task is to conduct a competitor analysis of your company against two other competitors. (Approximately 1,500 words). Develop the competitor analysis as follows:

  • Conduct five key forces (Porter) which impact on your industry competition.
  • Perform the PEST analysis for your company and compare the differences against your two competitors.
  • Conduct a benchmarking review covering internal benchmarking, external benchmarking and best-in-class benchmarking.
  • Describe the threats, bargaining power and competitive rivalry.
  • Prepare your statement of advice addressed to the company’s CEO on how your company differentiates itself from its competitors and what improvements can be made to your company.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The competitive landscape of any industry is shaped by various internal and external forces that influence the strategic positioning of companies within that sector. In this paper, a comprehensive competitor analysis will be conducted on a selected company, assessing industry forces, external environmental factors, benchmarking practices, and strategic threats. The purpose is to provide actionable insights and strategic recommendations to the company's CEO on how to strengthen its market position through differentiation and targeted improvements.

Porter’s Five Forces Analysis

Michael Porter’s Five Forces framework provides a systematic way to analyze the competitive intensity and, consequently, the attractiveness of an industry. These forces include the threat of new entrants, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers, threat of substitute products or services, and competitive rivalry among existing competitors.

1. Threat of New Entrants: The industry’s entry barriers are critical in determining new players’ threat. For industries with high capital requirements, strict regulatory standards, or significant economies of scale, the threat is mitigated. However, in industries where digital innovation lowers entry barriers, new competitors could challenge established companies.

2. Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Suppliers wield influence depending on their number, product uniqueness, and switching costs. For instance, a company reliant on a limited number of specialized suppliers faces higher bargaining power of suppliers.

3. Bargaining Power of Buyers: Customers have increased bargaining power when they are concentrated, purchase in large volumes, or have access to substitute products. Customer expectations and price sensitivity significantly impact profitability.

4. Threat of Substitutes: The availability of alternative products or services can threaten a company's market share, especially if substitutes offer similar benefits at lower prices or higher convenience.

5. Competitive Rivalry: The intensity among existing competitors influences profitability. Competition may be heightened through price wars, advertising battles, and product innovations.

These forces collectively shape industry profitability and will vary in strength relative to the two competitors examined in this analysis, influencing strategic decisions.

PEST Analysis and Comparative Industry Environment

PEST analysis assesses political, economic, social, and technological factors affecting a company’s environment. For our company, several critical factors are considered:

  • Political: Regulations, trade policies, and government stability impact operations and strategic planning.
  • Economic: Factors such as inflation rates, currency fluctuations, and economic growth influence consumer purchasing power.
  • Social: Demographic shifts, cultural trends, and consumer preferences affect demand for products and services.
  • Technological: Innovation, automation, and digital transformation present both opportunities and challenges.

Comparing these factors against two competitors reveals differences in agility, market responsiveness, and adaptation to external changes. For instance, one competitor may operate more effectively within regulatory frameworks or leverage technological advancements more rapidly, giving them a strategic edge.

Benchmarking Review

Effective benchmarking compares internal processes and practices against industry best practices to identify areas for improvement.

  • Internal Benchmarking: Analyzing performance metrics within different departments or divisions of the company reveals operational strengths and weaknesses.
  • External Benchmarking: Comparing practices and performance with competitors highlights gaps and opportunities for enhancement.
  • Best-in-Class Benchmarking: Identifying industry leaders that exemplify excellence helps set aspirational standards.

For example, the company may benchmark customer service response times, supply chain efficiencies, or marketing strategies, ensuring continuous improvement aligned with industry standards.

Threats, Bargaining Power, and Competitive Rivalry

Major threats include emerging competitors, disruptive technologies, and regulatory changes. The bargaining power of suppliers and customers affects pricing strategies and profit margins; high bargaining power may pressure the company into unfavorable terms.

Competitive rivalry remains intense when market share is fragmented or growth opportunities are limited, prompting frequent price competition and innovation battles. An understanding of these dynamics enables the development of strategies to mitigate risks and capitalize on industry opportunities.

Strategic Recommendations and Statement of Advice

The company can differentiate itself through innovation, customer-centric offerings, and operational excellence. To achieve this, strategic initiatives should focus on leveraging technological advantages, improving supply chain resilience, and enhancing brand loyalty.

Specifically, investments in advanced analytics and digital platforms can better anticipate customer needs and streamline operations. Building strategic alliances can also reduce supplier bargaining power and expand market reach.

Furthermore, fostering a culture of continuous improvement and agility will enable the company to respond effectively to industry shifts and emerging threats. These actions will assist in establishing a competitive advantage that sustains long-term growth and profitability.

In conclusion, comprehensive industry analysis integrating Porter’s Five Forces, PEST factors, and benchmarking provides crucial insights into the competitive environment. By strategically addressing identified threats and opportunities, the company can position itself effectively against competitors, ensuring sustained success and value creation for stakeholders.

References

  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press.
  • Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, G. R. (2012). Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach. South-Western Cengage Learning.
  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2017). Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization. Cengage Learning.
  • Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2017). Exploring Corporate Strategy. Pearson Education.
  • Grant, R. M. (2019). Contemporary Strategy Analysis. Wiley.
  • Yüksel, I. (2012). Developing a Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Supplier Selection. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 19(2), 216–229.
  • Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. S. (2015). Strategic Management and Competitive Advantage. Pearson.
  • Chen, J., & Miller, D. (2014). Competitive Dynamics and Eco-Systems. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 459–473.
  • Wheelen, T. L., & Hunger, J. D. (2017). Strategic Management and Business Policy. Pearson Education.
  • Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press.

Related Assignments