Page Minimum With Headers And Scholarly References Backgroun

3 Page Minimin With Headers And Scholarly References Background To Prepa

Identify a program evaluation you would like to conduct for a program with which you are familiar. Consider the details of the evaluation, including the purpose, specific questions to address, and the type of information to collect. Then, consider the stakeholders involved in approving that evaluation. Review resources for samples of program evaluations.

Develop a 1-page stakeholder analysis that identifies the stakeholders, their roles within the organization, and any concerns they might have about the proposed evaluation.

Draft a 2-page program evaluation plan to present to stakeholders, including:

• An abstract that states the purpose of the evaluation.
• A description of the questions to be addressed and the type of data to be collected.
• An discussion of stakeholder concerns identified in the stakeholder analysis.

Utilize scholarly resources, such as the Kellogg Foundation's guide and chapters on evaluation processes, to inform your assessment.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Program evaluation serves as an invaluable tool for assessing the effectiveness, efficiency, and impact of various programs within an organization or community. Conducting a structured evaluation aids stakeholders in understanding whether program goals are being met and identifies areas for improvement. This paper outlines the planning process for a program evaluation within a familiar setting, including stakeholder analysis and the development of an evaluation plan, emphasizing scholarly frameworks to guide the process.

Selection and Background of the Program

For this evaluation, I have chosen to assess a community-based health education program aimed at increasing awareness of chronic disease prevention among middle-aged adults. This program aims to foster behavioral change, improve health outcomes, and reduce long-term healthcare costs. Given its relevance, evaluating its effectiveness is crucial to ensure resource allocation aligns with community needs and to guide future improvements.

Stakeholder Analysis

The stakeholder analysis identifies key individuals and groups involved in or affected by the program evaluation. Primary stakeholders include program participants, healthcare providers involved in delivering the education sessions, program coordinators, and funding agency representatives. Participants are directly impacted by the educational content and may have concerns regarding privacy and the relevance of the evaluation. Healthcare providers may worry about additional workload or how the evaluation reflects upon their performance. Program coordinators are interested in demonstrating program effectiveness and securing future funding, whereas funding agencies seek measurable outcomes to justify their investment.

Other stakeholders include community leaders, local health departments, and policymakers. Community leaders may be concerned about community engagement and sustainability, while health departments and policymakers are concerned with public health implications and evidence-based practices. Recognizing these concerns facilitates stakeholder engagement and fosters a collaborative evaluation process.

Evaluation Purpose and Questions

The primary purpose of this evaluation is to determine the effectiveness of the health education program in changing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to chronic disease prevention among middle-aged adults. It also aims to identify program strengths and potential areas for improvement to enhance future implementation.

The evaluation addresses several specific questions:

• To what extent has the program increased participants’ knowledge about chronic disease risk factors?
• Have participants adopted healthier behaviors related to diet, physical activity, and medication adherence?
• What are the participants’ perceptions of the program’s relevance and utility?
• What barriers do participants face in implementing lifestyle changes?

Type of Data and Collection Methods

Data collection will involve a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews. Pre- and post-program questionnaires will measure changes in knowledge and self-reported behaviors. Focus groups and individual interviews will explore participants’ perceptions, barriers, and suggestions for improvement. Additionally, program attendance and engagement metrics will be recorded to assess participation levels. This comprehensive data collection strategy allows for robust evaluation of program outcomes and stakeholder insights.

Addressing Stakeholder Concerns

The evaluation plan explicitly considers stakeholder concerns identified during analysis. Privacy considerations are addressed by obtaining informed consent and anonymizing data. To reduce additional workload, data collection tools are designed to be minimally intrusive, and participation is voluntary. The relevance and usefulness of the evaluation are emphasized by tailoring questions to address stakeholder priorities, such as real-world behavioral change and program sustainability. Regular communication and stakeholder involvement throughout the process foster transparency and buy-in, ensuring that their concerns are acknowledged and managed effectively.

Conclusion

This structured approach aligns with best practices outlined by the Kellogg Foundation, promoting stakeholder engagement, clear evaluation questions, and comprehensive data collection. Successful implementation of this plan will provide valuable insights into the program’s impact and inform future health promotion initiatives, ultimately contributing to better health outcomes in the community.

References

• W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2017). The step-by-step guide to evaluation: How to become savvy evaluation consumers. Retrieved from https://www.wkkf.org
• Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-Focused Evaluation. SAGE Publications.
• Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. Pearson.
• Chen, H., & Rossi, P. (1987). Evaluating with sense: the principle of utility. New Directions for Evaluation, 1987(36), 37-47.
• Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation Thesaurus. SAGE Publications.
• Fitzgerald, L., & McKinney, K. (2017). Program Evaluation Theory and Practice: Creating Evidence-Based Practice. Routledge.
• Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. SAGE Publications.
• Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation: Methods for Studying Programs and Policies. Prentice Hall.
• Bamberger, M., Rugh, J., & Mabry, L. (2012). RealWorld Evaluation: Working Under Budget, Time, Data, and Political Constraints. SAGE Publications.
• Schneider, H., & Ingram, H. (2010). Program Evaluation. Routledge.