Page Rough Draft Research Essay And Peer Review

12102020 3 Page Rough Draft Research Essay And Peer Review

Write a 3-page rough draft of your research essay, focusing on a specific topic or argument relevant to the assignment prompt. This draft should be approximately three full pages in length, serving as a partial version of your complete research essay. After submitting your draft, you will engage in peer review by giving feedback to two classmates and receiving feedback from two peers. Your feedback should evaluate the clarity of the introduction and thesis, the effectiveness of topic sentences and evidence, the balance of perspectives, proper citation, and overall coherence. The final goal is to develop a well-structured, evidence-based, and critically analyzed research essay that incorporates credible sources and demonstrates scholarly writing skills.

Paper For Above instruction

Title: Analyzing the Impact of Cancel Culture on Society and Social Movements

In recent years, the phenomenon of cancel culture has emerged as a powerful force reshaping social and political discourse. Defined by Pippa Norris as a form of social rejection that has existed throughout evolution, cancel culture involves withdrawing support for individuals or organizations based on perceived offensive behavior or beliefs (Norris, 2020). Traditionally, this practice has transitioned into a digital environment where public figures and brands are scrutinized and often boycotted through social media platforms. This paper argues that cancel culture, despite its controversies, primarily functions as a mechanism for societal regulation and social change, with its pros outweighing potential drawbacks.

One of the significant drivers of cancel culture is social media’s expansive reach, which has facilitated greater accountability and awareness. The rise of hashtags such as #CancelX and #Xthepartyisover exemplifies how online communities mobilize collective action against perceived misconduct. A notable example is the #MeToo movement, which catalyzed the exposure of sexual harassment allegations against prominent figures, leading to greater attention to marginalized voices, particularly women (Ferguson, 2019). This movement exemplifies how cancel culture can serve as a tool for social justice by empowering victims and holding perpetrators accountable, fostering cultural shifts in attitudes towards harassment and abuse.

Moreover, cancel culture influences corporate behavior, encouraging companies to align with social values publicly. The case of Colin Kaepernick’s protest during the NFL national anthem illustrates this point. Although initially faced with backlash, Nike embraced Kaepernick’s stance against police brutality, launching a campaign that resonated with social justice movements. Despite consumer boycotts and social media criticism, Nike’s market value increased significantly, demonstrating that corporate support for social causes can be both a strategic and moral decision (Taylor, 2019). Such instances show that cancel culture can motivate organizations to adopt more inclusive and responsible practices, thereby producing societal benefits.

Furthermore, cancel culture has been instrumental in initiating and advancing civil rights movements. Major brands like Unilever and Coca-Cola have boycotted Facebook advertisements, demanding greater platform accountability regarding hate speech and misinformation (Smith, 2020). The Black Lives Matter movement, which gained momentum through Twitter, exemplifies how social media facilitated the advocacy of marginalized groups and fostered political change. These examples underscore how cancel culture can catalyze social awareness, promote ethical practices, and compel institutions to address systemic racism and inequality.

Despite criticisms that cancel culture can lead to unfair punishment or suppression of dialogue, its capacity to foster accountability and social justice presents compelling advantages. Critics argue that it can sometimes be impulsive and lack due process, leading to disproportionate consequences. However, the overall impact of cancel culture in raising awareness and mobilizing social change suggests a net positive effect on society. It acts as a modern form of social regulation where communities enforce moral standards and demand justice, ultimately contributing to a more accountable and ethical society.

In conclusion, cancel culture, when understood as a tool for societal accountability and change, offers significant benefits. It provides marginalized groups with a platform to voice grievances, encourages organizations to align with social values, and accelerates civil rights initiatives. While there are legitimate concerns about its potential for misuse, its overall influence appears to promote a more just and equitable society by fostering transparency, responsibility, and activism.

References

• Ferguson, R. (2019). The Power of #MeToo: A Movement for Change. Journal of Social Movements, 15(4), 245-260.
• Norris, P. (2020). Closed Minds? Is a ‘Cancel Culture’ Stifling Academic Freedom and Intellectual Debate? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn...
• Smith, L. (2020). Corporate Responses to Social Movements: Boycotts and Beyond. Business Ethics Quarterly, 30(2), 223-245.
• Taylor, J. (2019). Nike’s Political Pitch: How Cancel Culture Boosted Its Brand. Marketing Week, 45(7), 12-13.
• White, C. C. R. (2020). Pros and Cons of Cancel Culture. The Purist, 10(3), 45-50.