Pageapa Style When Designing Data Definitions You Will Be As

1 Pageapa Stylewhen Designing Data Definitions You Will Be Assigning

When designing data definitions, you will be assigning meaning to the data elements that are part of the computerized data. If there is no definition to the data, then it is not information. Complete the following in 1 page: Design a list of 10 data elements related to the patient demographic information (refer back to the data sets if necessary). Indicate characteristics of each example, such as date format, text, alphanumeric, and so on. Define the number of characters for each data element and if it is required data based on a data set.

Paper For Above instruction

Designing precise data definitions is foundational in health informatics, ensuring that data collected, stored, and analyzed represent accurate, consistent, and meaningful information. Specifically, patient demographic data forms the core of medical records, facilitating effective communication, treatment planning, billing, and legal documentation. For this assignment, a comprehensive list of 10 essential data elements related to patient demographic information will be developed, complete with their characteristics, such as data type, character length, formatting, and whether they are mandatory based on typical healthcare datasets.

1. Patient ID: This unique alphanumeric identifier distinguishes each patient within the healthcare system. The format typically combines letters and numbers, such as "A123456789". The maximum character length is 10 characters. This data element is required to ensure proper linkage of all patient data across various systems and reports.

2. First Name: Represents the patient's given name. This data is stored as text, with a maximum length of 30 characters. It is a required field to identify patients personally and facilitate communication.

3. Last Name: Contains the family or surname of the patient. Similar to the first name, it is text-based and allows for up to 30 characters. This is required for identification and legal documentation.

4. Date of Birth: The birth date of the patient, formatted as YYYY-MM-DD (e.g., 1985-07-23). It is a required date field essential for age verification, risk stratification, and age-specific medical decision-making.

5. Gender: This data element indicates the patient's gender identity, stored as a single character or abbreviated text such as "M" for male, "F" for female, and "O" for other. The format is text, with 1 character length, and it is required to support gender-specific health considerations.

6. Address: The patient's residential address, including street, city, state, and ZIP code. Stored as text with a maximum of 100 characters for the full address. It is a required data element used for contact, billing, and demographic analysis.

7. Phone Number: The contact number, formatted as a string of digits possibly including area code and separators, e.g., "(555) 123-4567". It is typically 14 characters max, including formatting characters, and required for communication.

8. Email Address: The patient's email for electronic communication. Stored as text, with a maximum length of 50 characters. While not always mandatory, it is increasingly required in modern datasets for correspondence and appointment reminders.

9. Marital Status: An abbreviated code such as "S" for single, "M" for married, "D" for divorced, or "W" for widowed. This is stored as text with 1-character length and generally considered a required demographic data element.

10. Race/Ethnicity: A descriptive text or code indicating the patient's racial or ethnic background, such as "Hispanic," "African American," or code-based options like "A" for Asian, "B" for Black, etc. The character length is up to 20 characters, and this data is required for demographic and epidemiological analysis.

These data elements collectively ensure comprehensive patient demographic profiles essential for effective healthcare delivery. Properly defining these variables according to data type, length, format, and requirement status improves data quality, interoperability, and utility in clinical and administrative processes.

References

• Hersh, W. R., Weiner, M. G., Embi, P. J., et al. (2015). Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research. Medical Care, 53(2), e1–e6.
• Häyrinen, K., Saranto, K., & Nykänen, P. (2008). Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(5), 291–304.
• Friedman, C., & Hripcsak, G. (2017). Clinical Data Reuse & Analytics: A Primer. Springer.
• Carey, L., & Hurdle, J. F. (2016). Developing Data Standards for Clinical Data. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 63, 14–20.
• Harrison, M. M., & Kuperman, G. J. (2014). Data quality and integrity in electronic health records: A review of current practices and future directions. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21(4), 645–652.
• Institute of Medicine. (2003). Health Data in the Information Age: Use, Disclosure, and Privacy. The National Academies Press.
• HIMSS. (2018). Guide to Data Standards for Health Information Exchange. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society.
• Tsai, C. F., et al. (2019). Improving Data Quality in Electronic Health Records to Support Analytic and Operational Needs. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 97, 103238.
• Weiskopf, N. G., & Weng, C. (2013). Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(1), 144–151.
• Potter, B. K., & Hughes, M. A. (2016). Electronic Health Records and Data Quality: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Medical Systems, 40(8), 180.