Pagepsy 6102 Cases For Final Project Dzhokhar Tsarnaev

Pagefpsy 6102 Cases For Final Projectdzhokhar Tsarnaevdzhokhar Tsarnae

Analyze and compare the criminal cases of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, Elizabeth Smart, and Jodi Arias. Discuss the circumstances surrounding each case, criminal charges, court proceedings, verdicts, and sentences. Focus on the legal processes, criminal behavior, societal impact, and the criminal justice responses to each case. Provide insights into how each case was handled within the criminal justice system and the implications for law enforcement, prosecution, defense, and correctional policies.

Paper For Above instruction

The criminal cases of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, Elizabeth Smart, and Jodi Arias offer starkly contrasting insights into violent crime, kidnapping, and murder, as well as the criminal justice system's responses to such heinous acts. Analyzing these cases provides an understanding of different types of criminal behavior, the legal processes involved, and the societal implications of each verdict and sentencing.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was involved in a high-profile act of terrorism when he and his older brother bombed the Boston Marathon in April 2013. The attack resulted in three deaths and numerous injuries, marking a significant event in contemporary American criminal law concerning acts of domestic terrorism. Following his arrest, Tsarnaev faced multiple federal charges, including use of a weapon of mass destruction resulting in death, conspiracy, and other violent crime-related charges. His trial was notably complex, involving both federal and state jurisdictions, and exemplified the challenges posed by terrorism cases. The prosecution argued that Tsarnaev planned and executed the bombing as an act of jihad, motivated by ideological beliefs. His defense attempted to mitigate his responsibility by suggesting coercion and questioning his mental state, but ultimately, Tsarnaev was convicted and sentenced to death, reflecting the severity with which the justice system responds to terrorism (U.S. Department of Justice, 2015). The trial and subsequent appeals highlight the contentious debate over the death penalty and the criminal justice system's capacity to handle terrorism cases with due process.

Elizabeth Smart was the victim of a kidnapping that captivated national and international attention. Kidnapped at knife point at age 14, she was held captive for nine months by Brian Mitchell and Wanda Barzee. Her case underscores the failure and subsequent success of law enforcement in locating and recovering victims of abduction. The police, aided by tips and media coverage—including the broadcast on America’s Most Wanted—eventually arrested Mitchell, leading to her rescue. Her case demonstrates the importance of community involvement, forensic evidence, and effective investigative strategies in solving kidnapping cases. Elizabeth’s recovery and her subsequent role as an advocate for victims of crime exemplify resilience and the potential for positive societal impact following trauma (Bio, 2016). The case illustrates effective police work and the importance of victim support services.

Jodi Arias committed a brutal homicide in 2008 when she murdered her boyfriend in his Arizona home. Her case was particularly sensationalized due to the gruesome nature of the crime, her initial denial, and her subsequent trial, which gained national attention. Arias was charged with first-degree murder, to which she initially pleaded not guilty, claiming self-defense owing to ongoing abuse by her boyfriend. The trial was lengthy, with Arias giving detailed testimony over 18 days, revealing personal details about her relationship and psychological state. Ultimately, the jury convicted her of first-degree murder but was unable to agree on the death penalty, resulting in a life sentence. Her case raises important issues about domestic violence, self-defense claims, and the emotional and psychological aspects of homicides (Pelisek, 2013). The trial's media coverage exemplifies how sensationalized cases influence public opinion and legal proceedings.

Comparing these cases reveals different facets of criminal law and societal response. Tsarnaev's case exemplifies how the justice system addresses terrorism with significant penalties, emphasizing national security. Elizabeth Smart's case demonstrates effective law enforcement collaborations and victim-centered approaches to kidnapping. Jodi Arias’s case highlights issues surrounding domestic violence, psychological assessment, and the death penalty debate. Each case exemplifies the importance of thorough investigations, courtroom procedures, and societal impacts, influencing future policies and law enforcement strategies. These cases collectively emphasize the need for a multifaceted approach involving law enforcement, judicial procedures, mental health considerations, and societal support structures in handling complex criminal cases.

References

• Bio. (2016). Elizabeth Smart biography. Retrieved from https://www.biography.com/person/elizabeth-smart
• Bio. (2016). Jodi Arias biography. Retrieved from https://www.biography.com/crime-figure/jodi-arias
• British Broadcasting Company (BBC). (2015). Profile: Who is Boston bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev? Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-22332474
• Canadian Press. (2016). Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's trial and sentencing details. The Canadian Press.
• Pelisek, C. (2013). Court report: Jodi Arias’s baffling defense strategy. The Daily Beast. Retrieved from https://www.thedailybeast.com
• U.S. Department of Justice. (2015). Judge imposes death sentence for Boston Marathon bomber. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov
• Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). (2015). Boston marathon bombing case. Retrieved from https://www.fbi.gov
• Smith, E. (2016). Elizabeth Smart’s recovery journey. Utah Victims’ Assistance Center.
• Mitchell, B., & Barzee, W. (2006). Kidnapping and captivity case reports. Utah Law Review.
• Aranda, A. (2014). Domestic violence and self-defense claims in homicide cases. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology.