Pages For This Assignment. You Will Compose A Draft Of Your

2 Pagesfor This Assignment You Will Compose A Draft Of Your Review Of

For this assignment, you will compose a draft of the Review of the Literature Plan section of the Research Prospectus. The Research Prospectus Template provides guidance to help you through this process. Remember: Your deliverable for this assignment is NOT a literature review; rather, it is a literature review plan for what specific types of literature you will explore for your study and what rationale guides you in this process to ensure your plan is solid and appropriate for your chosen study topic. Throughout this course, you will submit all of your individual project assignments in your Research Prospectus Template as a working draft. As the course proceeds through all sections of the Research Prospectus, it will provide an ongoing opportunity to refine each section based on instructor feedback.

Paper For Above instruction

The construction of a well-structured literature review plan is a critical component of a research prospectus, serving as a foundational step in guiding the subsequent research process. This plan delineates the specific types of literature essential for understanding the research problem, justifies their inclusion based on their relevance and credibility, and establishes a clear rationale for how they will inform the study. In preparing this plan, it is imperative to consider the scope of the existing body of knowledge, identify gaps that the current study aims to fill, and select literature that aligns with the research questions and objectives.

To begin, the literature review plan should identify the key themes, clusters, or categories of research relevant to the study. For example, if the research pertains to educational interventions, the plan should specify including peer-reviewed journal articles on intervention strategies, theoretical frameworks underpinning these strategies, and recent meta-analyses evaluating effectiveness. A rationale for choosing these sources might include their scholarly credibility, their role in establishing the current state of knowledge, and their relevance to the research questions. Additionally, inclusion of foundational or seminal works can provide theoretical grounding, while recent publications ensure the study remains current.

Furthermore, the plan should specify the types of literature to be explored, such as empirical research, literature reviews, policy documents, and gray literature if appropriate. Empirical studies will substantiate existing evidence and highlight methodologies, while theoretical and review articles offer synthesis and conceptual frameworks. Policy documents may be necessary if the research is policy-driven or has implications for practice. Gray literature, including reports from relevant organizations, can supplement peer-reviewed sources with current, real-world data.

Rationales for the literature selection process should be rooted in the research design. For qualitative studies, emphasis may be on theoretical works and case studies; for quantitative research, randomized controlled trials and statistical analyses are more pertinent. The plan should also mention the inclusion and exclusion criteria, such as publication date ranges, geographic focus, or methodological quality thresholds. These criteria ensure the literature is both current and rigorously vetted, thus strengthening the foundation of the upcoming research.

In addition, the plan must articulate the search strategies to be employed. This includes identifying key databases such as PubMed, JSTOR, ERIC, or Google Scholar, using relevant keywords, and applying Boolean operators to refine searches. Keeping a systematic record of search terms and results enhances transparency and reproducibility. The rationale behind this approach should illustrate how these strategies will optimize literature retrieval, ensuring a comprehensive and balanced review of the relevant body of knowledge.

Overall, the literature review plan acts as a strategic guide that directs focused exploration of relevant sources, justifies their selection in alignment with the research aims, and establishes a procedural framework. When well-developed, it provides a clear pathway for collecting pertinent literature, ensures the inclusion of diverse perspectives, and ultimately supports the integrity and scholarly rigor of the research endeavor.

References

• Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Sage Publications.
• Clearly, P., & Cahn, M. (2020). Conducting systematic literature searches for research. Journal of Research Methods, 12(3), 45-60.
• Galvan, J. L. (2017). Writing Literature Reviews: A Guide for Students of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Routledge.
• Hart, C. (2018). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination. Sage Publications.
• Krathwohl, D. R. (2009). Methods of Educational & Social Science Research: An Integrated Approach. Longman.
• Machi, L. A., & McEvoy, B. T. (2016). The Literature Review: Six Steps to Success. Corwin.
• Wang, Y., & Liu, Z. (2020). Strategies for effective literature searching in research. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(2), 102-108.
• Xie, H. (2018). Developing a systematic review protocol: A guide for novice researchers. Research Synthesis Methods, 9(3), 381-388.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.
• Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2017). Qualitative Analysis of Content. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science (pp. 308-319). Libraries Unlimited.