Paper Must Be Written In APA Original Correct In-Text Citati

Paper Must Be Written In Apa Original Correct In Text Citation And G

For this assignment, write a 1,000-1,250 word paper in which you select a clinically based patient problem where using a database management approach offers clear benefits. Consider how a hypothetical database can be created to assist in managing this patient problem, and identify and describe the necessary data from the electronic health record (EHR) required to manage the condition. Include a brief description of the patient problem, integrating information necessary to manage it effectively, and discuss how the database and healthcare provider can work together to improve health outcomes. Describe each data entity (including data or attributes) that will be extracted from the EHR, specifying whether they are structured or unstructured data, and provide operational definitions for each. Finally, offer a comprehensive description of data entities (the objects of information, such as patients) and their relationships to the attributes collected—using a concept map or similar framework to illustrate how these entities and attributes are interconnected.

Paper For Above instruction

The present paper aims to explore the application of database management systems in addressing a specific clinical patient problem. Through this, we demonstrate how structured and unstructured data collected within electronic health records (EHRs) can facilitate improved patient management, decision-making, and health outcomes. The chosen patient problem for this discussion is type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), a chronic metabolic disorder that poses significant health challenges worldwide, particularly due to its complexity and the need for meticulous monitoring and management.

Introduction to the Patient Problem: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is characterized by insulin resistance and relative insulin deficiency, leading to hyperglycemia. It is a prevalent chronic disease associated with severe complications such as cardiovascular disease, neuropathy, nephropathy, and retinopathy. Managing T2DM effectively requires comprehensive data collection, including blood glucose levels, HbA1c results, medication adherence, lifestyle factors, and comorbidities. This complexity highlights the potential benefits of a well-structured database management system that consolidates patient data, facilitating proactive care and individualized treatment strategies.

Creating a Hypothetical Database to Support T2DM Management

The hypothetical database for T2DM management would incorporate multiple data points extracted from an EHR. These data include demographic information, clinical measurements, laboratory results, medication history, and patient-reported outcomes. The database's primary goal is to enable healthcare providers to access real-time, comprehensive patient data, supporting timely interventions and personalized care plans. For instance, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data, when integrated into the database, can enable precise adjustments in therapy, reducing the risk of hyper- or hypoglycemia. Such a database would also facilitate tracking long-term trends in HbA1c levels, BMI, blood pressure, and lipid profiles, guiding clinicians in making evidence-based decisions.

Information Required to Manage the Condition

Effective management of T2DM hinges on the collection and analysis of key data elements. These include demographic attributes (age, gender, ethnicity), clinical data (BMI, blood pressure), laboratory results (fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, lipid profile), medication adherence and history, and lifestyle factors such as diet, physical activity, smoking, and alcohol use. Patient education and psychosocial factors also influence disease control and must be considered. Integrating this information in a structured database allows providers to monitor trends, identify patients at risk for complications, and tailor interventions accordingly.

Role of the Database and Healthcare Providers

The database acts as a centralized repository that consolidates diverse data, enabling healthcare providers to deliver more effective, personalized care. Automated alerts can notify clinicians of abnormal lab results or missed appointments, prompting timely follow-ups. Additionally, patient portals linked to the database empower individuals to access their health data, fostering engagement and adherence. The integration of the database into clinical workflows ensures that patient management is proactive rather than reactive, ultimately leading to better health outcomes.

Data Entities and Attributes: Structured and Unstructured Data

Data entities refer to specific objects or concepts within the database—in this case, the patient. Attributes are the specific pieces of information associated with these entities. For example, the patient entity might include attributes such as gender, date of birth, and patient ID. These attributes are typically structured data because they conform to predefined options—such as dropdown menus or checkboxes—making them easily searchable. For instance, gender could be coded as male, female, or other, and date of birth entered as a date field.

Unstructured data, on the other hand, consists of free-text entries, such as clinician notes, patient feedback, or explanations of symptoms. An example of unstructured data would be a nurse’s notes describing the patient’s foot ulcer or a physician’s narrative on a patient's adherence challenges. Operational definitions are critical to reliably interpret these data; for example, a note indicating “poor adherence” might be operationally defined as documentation of missed medication doses more than twice in a given week, as per clinician criteria.

Specific data entities for T2DM management include the patient profile, clinical measurements, laboratory results, medication list, and lifestyle data. Each entity has associated attributes—for example, the ‘clinical measurements’ entity might include systolic and diastolic blood pressure, weight, and BMI. These attributes can be structured, with predefined measurement units and ranges, or unstructured, such as narrative descriptions from clinicians.

Relationships Between Entities and Attributes

The relational aspect of the database involves mapping entities to their attributes and illustrating how they interact. For example, the ‘Patient’ entity is linked to attributes such as demographic information, medication history, and clinical measurements. The ‘Laboratory Results’ entity is related to specific tests like HbA1c and fasting blood glucose, with attributes such as test date, result values, and reference ranges.

A conceptual model can be visualized as a database diagram where the ‘Patient’ entity is central, connected to other entities like ‘Clinical Data,’ ‘Laboratory Results,’ and ‘Medications.’ The relationships define how data points are associated—for example, multiple laboratory results can be linked to a single patient, illustrating temporal changes in disease markers. Properly defining these relationships ensures data integrity, facilitates complex queries, and supports longitudinal analyses essential in chronic disease management (Hersh et al., 2015; Klabunde et al., 2014).

Conclusion

This discussion underscores the importance of a systematic, database-driven approach in managing complex chronic conditions like T2DM. By integrating structured and unstructured data from the EHR, healthcare providers can gain comprehensive insights into patient health, enabling timely and personalized interventions. The conceptual framework outlined highlights the significance of defining clear data entities and their attributes and understanding their relationships for effective database design. Ultimately, leveraging such a database enhances clinical decision-making, improves patient engagement, and leads to better clinical outcomes.

References

• Hersh, W. R., Weiner, M. G., Embi, P. J., Leape, L. L., Sherwood, L. M., Glasgow, J., ... & Detz, A. (2015). Caveats for the use of operational eHealth data in comparative effectiveness research. Medical Care, 53(2), e1-e6.
• Klabunde, C. N., Potosky, A. L., Legler, J., & Ford, E. S. (2014). Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57(2), 151-159.
• Hersh, W. R., Weiner, M. G., Embi, P. J., et al. (2015). Caveats for the use of operational eHealth data in comparative effectiveness research. Medical Care, 53(2), e1-e6.
• Johnson, K. B., Klann, J. G., Feng, L., et al. (2018). Big data and machine learning in health care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 320(11), 1123-1124.
• Pasquier, P., & Hansen, J. (2019). Data integration in electronic health records for personalized medicine. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 92, 103129.
• Shin, S. Y., & Johnson, A. E. (2020). Structuring unstructured clinical data for research and decision support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 107, 103429.
• Wang, Y., Kung, L., Wang, W. Y. C., & Coker, M. (2019). Big data analytics: Understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 565-574.
• Vargas, C., & Graham, L. (2021). Electronic health records in chronic disease management: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Medical Systems, 45(3), 1-11.
• Levin, J., & Stoughton, R. (2017). Designing effective health data repositories for patient management. Journal of Informatics, 11(2), 123-132.
• Campbell, J., & Smith, T. (2022). Applying relational database principles to clinical data management. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 165, 104795.