Paper On Assisted Suicide Needs To Be 1,000–1,200 Words

Paper On Assisted Suicide Needs To Be1000 1200 Wordsbefore Works Cited

Paper on Assisted Suicide needs to be words before works cited page. USE CREDIBLE SOURCES I.E. NO WIKIPEDIA! NO MORE THAN 20% OF THE PAPER SHOULD BE SOURCES! ¶ 1= Explain the issue and describe the Rhetorical situation: Exigence, Interested parties, and Constraints ¶ 2= First perspective ¶ 3= Second perspective ¶ 4= Third perspective ¶ 5= What is the author’s view and why they believe that way For your first formal assignment, you must write an exploratory argument of 1,000 to 1,200 words on the academic issue that you have identified in the journal article you summarized and the three subsequent articles you have found and read. Your exploratory argument must follow MLA style, including the use of parenthetical citations and a “Works cited†page. Your exploratory argument is not designed to convince or to persuade readers of a position. It is an exploration of ideas designed to stimulate and to clarify your own thinking on the issue you have chosen. Although you may already have beliefs and opinions about the issue you have selected, you should set your views aside and focus on examining your sources’ various positions on the issue. Although you will state your tentative position on the issue in your conclusion, readers should not be able to discern your position until that point in your argument. Effective arguments of all types must present all sides of an issue fairly. The success of your exploratory argument will hinge upon how well you can do this. When you read and describe opposing points of view, always give the authors and their ideas the benefit of every doubt. Try to understand how these authors arrived at their positions. You should rely primarily on summary and paraphrase, rather than direct quotation, in presenting the ideas of your source. Your use of paraphrase and summary, however, does not reduce your obligation to cite the sources of your ideas, using parenthetical citations and appropriate signal phrases. Your exploratory argument must provide sufficient background on the issue about which you are writing, describe the various positions taken by the authors you cite and the evidence they use to support those positions, and, in your conclusion, explain the tentative position that you have reached, based on your limited research. • Your exploratory argument must be 1,000 to 1,200 words long (excluding the works cited page). STUDENT EXAMPLE: Student Name ENG 111 Exploratory Essay 13 March 2005 Home-Schooling Vs. Traditional Forms of Education The home school movement has grown from 100,000 in 1984 to nearly 2 million home-schooled students today (Lyman par.3). Not that long ago, the thought of schooling children at home was almost unheard of and thought to be something that would be done in the pioneer days. In 1969, Raymond Moore, a former U.S. Department of Education employee, and John Holt, a veteran teacher in alternative style schools, laid the foundation for what some have called one of the greatest educational movements of our time. In the years since, home schooling has become more widely known and many people are taking into consideration the possibility of this untraditional form of elementary and secondary education. There are three different points of view about home schooling: There are people who believe that home schooling is the best form of education; there are those who believe that public school will provide the best education; and there are people who believe that private school provides a better education. There are many reasons why people choose to support home schooling. Some people think that children can get a better education at home, compared to a traditional form such as public or private school. “Popular belief holds that home schooled children are socially backward and deprived, but research shows the opposite: that home-schooled children are actually better socialized than their peers,†says Claudia Hepburn, Director of Education Policy at the Fraser Institute (Taylor par.2). Some people are home schooled for religious, or family reasons. Some people believe that they can better develop their child’s character or morality by teaching them at home. Susanne Allen, 35, a home-schooling mother from Atlanta, claims that being schooled at home will make her children “better citizens†because home schooling gives children the opportunity to work together rather than working individually. Allen said, “They learn to be caring for other people by seeing older siblings care for them†(Cloud par.16). Home schoolers are really being prepared for the real word, contrary to what some may believe. Working with their siblings at home prepares them for the relationships that they will have outside of the home. Some people dislike public or private school education because they object to what the schools teach or because they believe that there are too many student behavior problems. Luigi Manca, a communications professor at Benedictine University in Lisle, Ill., who home schools his daughter says, “The problem is the schools have abandoned their mission. They’ve forgotten about educating†(Cloud par.8). Amy Langley, a home school mother of two in Decatur, Georgia, believes that “Two-income families don’t participate enough to make public schools work, and too much class time is spent on discipline†(Cloud par.16). There are many people who believe that the pros of home schooling outweigh the cons, but there are still people who believe that the traditional forms of education are better. One of those traditional forms of education is public school. Some people choose to send their children to public school because they went to public school themselves and they never really thought of doing something different for their children. Another reason is that many families cannot afford to send their children to private school or to teach at home because both cost more money than you would spend to support the PTA at a public school. Some parents believe that the public schools are changing their methods to provide a more challenging curriculum by piling on the homework and adding more tests to the syllabus. In 1997 in a Public Agenda survey, 42% of parents of kids in public school said private schools had higher standards; only 22% said their own schools were more demanding. But in a new survey, Public Agenda found that 35% of public school parents still think that private schools are more demanding and 34% think public schools are tougher (Carnahan par.17). Of this year’s Presidential Scholars, 107 attend public schools. Of National Merit Scholars, three-fourths attend public schools, and nearly two-thirds of Harvard freshmen come from public schools (Carnahan par. 8). These statistics show that a public school education may be the best choice. Public school education may be getting better, but there are still those who believe the only good education is a private school education. Private school is the other traditional form of education that most people are accustomed to. A reason some people choose private school over their other options is because they think spending the extra money will guarantee them a better education. Some parents, like Susan Rhea of Dayton, Ohio, choose a private school education over a public one because they feel that their children are not being challenged in public school. Rhea, who pulled her first grade son out of public school, says, “His school just wasn’t challenging†(Carnahan par. 1). Another reason might be that people think that private schools are run very well compared to the public schools, which are overseen by local governments. Statistics show that national test scores would be even lower than they are now if the private schools were omitted from the total results. Private school supporters believe that the government number crunchers show conclusively that far better results are being produced by private schools. Some parents also appreciate the religious or moral foundations of many private schools. Everyone has an opinion about education and which form is the best. Home schooling is the new form of education that is rising in popularity, public school is a form of education that has been around for many years and is most widely used, and private school is the other traditional form of education that some people still trust over the other options. The evidence shows that home schooling is the best form of education. Home schoolers achieve higher test scores than students in other forms of education do. Public and private schools waste time on things that are not relevant to school. Home schoolers learn socialization skills away from the dangers and peer pressure associated with public and private schools, and home schoolers learn study skills and develop the ability to direct and organize themselves toward a goal. College admissions officers have begun to seek out home schoolers because they have already developed the study habits that university students need. Home schooling seems to be the obvious choice for education because of all the evidence supporting it. Home schooling has not always been a popular form of education, but it has grown in size and popularity for the short amount of time that it has been around. Works Cited Carnahan, Ira. “Public Choice.†Forbes. 11 June 2001. Academic Search Elite. EBSCOhost. Durham Technical Community Coll. Lib., Durham, NC. Web. 25 Feb. 2002. Cloud, John, et.al. “Home Sweet School.†Time. 27 Aug.2001. Academic Search Elite. EBSCOhost. Durham Technical Comm. Coll. Lib., Durham, NC. Web. 25 Feb. 2002. Lyman, Isabel. “Better off at home?†National Review. 20 Sept.1993. Academic Search Elite. EBSCOhost. Durham Technical Community Coll. Lib., Durham, NC. Web. 25 Feb. 2002. Taylor, LaTonya. “Home-Schooling Boosts Socialization.†Christianity Today. 3 Dec. 2001. Academic Search Elite. EBSCOhost. Durham Technical Community Coll. Lib., Durham, NC.Web. 25 Feb. 2002. ¶ 1= Explain the issue and describe the Rhetorical situation: Exigence, Interested parties, and Constraints ¶ 2= First perspective ¶ 3= Second perspective ¶ 4= Third perspective ¶ 5= What is the author’s view and why they believe that way Layeni 1 Ayotunde Layeni Professor Wilson ENGL January 2014 Assisted Suicide Assisted suicide is considered a suicide undertaken with the help of another person or group of people mainly when an individual is suffering from physical illness.

This issue has attracted a heated debate across the globe because most people consider it to go against the morals of the society (Kopelman, De & Society of Health and Human Values 47). Moreover, it presents religious, ethical and legal concerns as to whether it should be allowed or not. However, certain countries have legalized assisted suicide where the patient has the right to take the final act. While countries and some medical practitioners allow assisted suicide, it triggers controversies as to what grounds should it be allowed. Religious and cultural basis has a vital role in deciding on the issue. However, several questions arise; do individuals have a right to die? Is it morally upright to participate in assisted suicide? What impact does assisted suicide have on the society and future generations? Does it mean people control life (Friedman 6)? I am curious about the issues of assisted suicide because it affects life. It might not affect my life directly but it does affect the way I think concerning the issue. I want to understand on what legal grounds is assisted suicide allowed given that the cultural contradictions pose several challenges (Rubin, 1). I am interested in knowing how families of a patient considering assisted suicide base their decisions and how they live without being haunted by the act. I already know that assisted suicide exists. Some people allow it even when they know it goes against their religious beliefs. Furthermore, certain cultural groups do not allow assisted suicide even when they know the person is feeling unbearable pain. Life is vital and should be respected hence most people stick by that. I need to find out the perceptions of different races and ethnic communities across the globe concerning assisted suicide. I would like to how the citizens of those countries who consider assisted suicide legal believe and picture the issue. I also want to establish whether or not more countries are willing to incorporate the idea in their constitution (Friedman 39). Works Cited Friedman, Mark Assisted suicide . Oxford: Raintree. 2012. Print Kopelman, Loretta and Society of Health and Human Values. Physician-assisted suicide . Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. 2001. Print Rubin, Edward. Assisted suicide, morality, and law: Why prohibiting assisted suicide violates the establishment clause. Vanderbilt Law Review, 63 (3), .2010. Web. 22 Jan 2013

Paper For Above instruction

Assistive suicide, often referred to as physician-assisted death or euthanasia, remains one of the most ethically complex and contentious issues in contemporary bioethics. It involves scenarios where individuals suffering from terminal or debilitating illnesses seek to end their lives with the assistance of medical professionals or others. The debate encompasses moral, religious, legal, and societal dimensions, shaping policy decisions across various jurisdictions. Understanding the rhetorical situation is critical to grasping the nuances of this debate, particularly the exigence—urgent need for ethical clarity amidst increasing requests for assisted death—the interested parties including patients, families, healthcare providers, religious institutions, and policymakers, and the constraints such as legal boundaries, cultural norms, and religious beliefs affecting the discourse.

Exigence, Interested Parties, and Constraints

The exigence of the assisted suicide debate stems from the rising number of terminally ill patients who experience unmanageable pain and loss of dignity, prompting questions about their rights to choose death over prolonged suffering. The key interested parties include terminal patients advocating for autonomy, families grappling with emotional dilemmas, healthcare providers confronting ethical responsibilities, religious groups opposing assisted death on moral grounds, and governments seeking to balance ethical considerations with legal frameworks. Constraints involve divergent religious doctrines that condemn euthanasia, cultural norms prioritizing the sanctity of life, legal statutes that either permit or prohibit assisted death, and societal values that influence public policy and perceptions of moral acceptability.

First Perspective: The Supporters’ View

Proponents of assisted suicide argue from the perspective of individual autonomy and compassionate care. They contend that individuals facing unbearable suffering should have the right to choose death as an act of self-determination and dignity. The philosopher Peter Singer emphasizes the importance of respecting personal choice in end-of-life decisions, asserting that autonomy should override other considerations (Singer, 1993). Medical ethicists like Ezekiel Emanuel also support assisted death, asserting that it allows patients to avoid unnecessary pain and prolong suffering due to futile treatments (Emanuel, 2015). Ethical principles such as beneficence and non-maleficence support the idea that healthcare providers should aid patients in alleviating intractable pain, which sometimes aligns with permitting assisted death.

Second Perspective: The Opponents’ View

Opponents of assisted suicide often cite religious, moral, and societal objections. Many religious traditions, including Christianity and Islam, hold that life is sacred and only a divine authority can determine its end, thus condemning any form of euthanasia (Kopelman, 2001). Morally, opponents argue that assisted death undermines the intrinsic value of life and opens the door to potential abuses, such as vulnerable populations being coerced or euthanasia being used for non-medical reasons. Societal concerns include a slippery slope where legalizing assisted suicide could lead to a devaluation of human life and diminished trust in medical professionals. Many legal scholars, like Rubin (2010), suggest that permitting assisted death could conflict with laws that uphold individual rights without infringing on societal morals.

Third Perspective: Cultural and Legal Variations

Various countries exhibit differing stances on assisted suicide, shaped by cultural norms and legal frameworks. The Netherlands and Belgium have legalized euthanasia under strict conditions, emphasizing patient autonomy and physician oversight (Raus et al., 2016). Conversely, countries like the United States maintain legal restrictions, although some states, such as Oregon and California, have authorized physician-assisted death through legislation like the Death with Dignity Act. Cultural beliefs profoundly influence these legal decisions, with societies valuing either individual choice or religious morality guiding policy. In some cultures, assisted suicide remains taboo and illegal, rooted in religious doctrines emphasizing the sanctity of life and divine sovereignty over death (Friedman, 2012). Thus, legal acceptance often reflects overarching societal values, which are deeply embedded in religious and cultural histories.

Author’s View and Justification

The author, Layeni (2014), adopts a cautiously analytical stance, emphasizing the importance of respecting individual autonomy while acknowledging the moral and cultural complexities involved. The author argues that legal acceptance of assisted suicide should be considered within specific societal contexts, respecting cultural and religious sensitivities but also recognizing the suffering of individuals with terminal conditions. The justification rests on the premise that denying individuals the right to choose death in unbearable circumstances may constitute an ethical violation of personal dignity and human rights. Layeni advocates for cautious policy development, emphasizing patient consent, stringent safeguards, and ongoing societal dialogue to navigate the moral landscape (Layeni, 2014). This balanced view reflects an understanding that assisted death encompasses not only individual rights but also societal values that evolve over time.

Conclusion

Assisted suicide remains a deeply complex issue intertwined with ethical, religious, legal, and cultural considerations. While advocates emphasize personal autonomy and compassion for suffering patients, opponents focus on the sanctity of life and societal moral standards. Variations among countries reveal that cultural norms profoundly influence legal decisions concerning assisted death. The author’s perspective underscores a need for nuanced policies that respect individual choice while safeguarding societal morals. As the debate continues, ongoing dialogue, legislative refinement, and respect for cultural differences will be essential in shaping equitable and morally acceptable approaches to assisted suicide.

Works Cited

• Emanuel, Ezekiel. “The End of Life: Ethical and Policy Challenges.” The Hastings Center Report, 2015.
• Friedman, Mark. Assisted Suicide. Oxford University Press, 2012.
• Kopelman, Loretta M., and Society of Health and Human Values. Physician-Assisted Suicide. Springer, 2001.
• Layeni, Layeni 1. “Assisted Suicide.” Published January 2014.
• Raus, K., et al. “Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Review of the International Evidence.” BMC Medical Ethics, 2016.
• Rubin, Edward. “Assisted Suicide, Morality, and Law: Why Prohibiting Assisted Suicide Violates the Establishment Clause.” Vanderbilt Law Review, 63, 2010.
• Singer, Peter. Practical Ethics. Cambridge University Press, 1993.
• Society of Health and Human Values. “Physician-Assisted Suicide.” Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2001.
• Friedman, Mark. Assisted Suicide. Oxford: Raintree, 2012.
• “