Part 1: Pre-Assessment And Implementation Follow Thes 037459

Part 1 Pre Assessment And Implementationfollow These Steps For This W

Part 1 Pre Assessment And Implementationfollow These Steps For This W

Part 1: Pre-assessment and Implementation Follow these steps for this week’s field experience: From your previous observation in your field experience classroom, you identified 3-5 students, above, at, or below standard achievement in the classroom environment that would benefit from additional learning support. You also identified the standards and unit that your mentor class is currently learning. With this information, complete the “Math Pre-Assessment” where you develop a pre-assessment in the math content area that aligns to the standards and unit that your mentor teacher shared with you during Clinical Field Experience A. This pre-assessment can be oral, written, or completed through technology.

The pre-assessment should identify how well selected students know the concept and provide data that would allow you to determine learning gaps and needs in order to develop an appropriate lesson to support learning needs. Share the pre-assessment with your mentor teacher and ask for his or her feedback. Administer the pre-assessment that you created with the selected group of students and use the data to prepare for Clinical Field Experience C.

Part 2: Reflection In words, summarize and reflect on your field experience and the steps you took to identify students for the pre-assessment. Consider: How did the pre-assessment provide data to determine the learning gaps and needs of students? What challenges did you face when developing and delivering the pre-assessment? Explain how you will use your findings in your future professional practice. APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of designing and implementing a pre-assessment during field experience is a vital step toward understanding students' current academic standing and tailoring instruction to meet their specific needs. In this context, I began by observing my mentor classroom to identify 3-5 students whose achievement levels varied around the standard—some performing above, at, or below the expected level. Recognizing their diverse learning needs was essential for developing an effective pre-assessment aligned with the current standards and unit being taught. This initial observation helped me narrow down the focus to students who would benefit most from targeted support, ensuring that the pre-assessment would be meaningful and tailored to their existing knowledge base.

Collaborating with my mentor teacher was an integral part of the process. Sharing the pre-assessment draft and seeking feedback allowed me to refine my questions to ensure alignment with curriculum standards and appropriateness for the students' developmental levels. The assessment I developed was primarily written, incorporating a mix of multiple-choice and open-ended questions designed to gauge students' understanding of key concepts within the math unit. This format enabled me to collect comprehensive data on individual student understanding and pinpoint specific misconceptions or gaps. Administering the pre-assessment to selected students provided valuable insights—students’ responses revealed varying degrees of mastery and areas needing reinforcement.

The resulting data were instrumental in identifying learning gaps. For instance, some students demonstrated misconceptions in problem-solving strategies, while others lacked foundational knowledge of specific mathematical operations. These insights helped me plan targeted interventions and differentiated instruction strategies to address the identified gaps. Throughout the process, challenges arose—one of the primary challenges was ensuring that the assessment was both comprehensive enough to capture learning needs yet concise enough to maintain student engagement. Additionally, adapting the assessment under time constraints and ensuring student honesty and effort posed difficulties, especially during remote or hybrid instruction scenarios.

Reflecting on this experience, I recognize that the pre-assessment not only provided crucial baseline data but also increased my awareness of individual student differences and the importance of formative assessment practices. Moving forward, I will incorporate similar pre-assessment strategies in my professional practice to inform instructional decisions continuously. The insights gained will enable me to tailor lessons more effectively, foster student confidence through targeted support, and monitor progress over time. Challenges such as developing clear assessment items and managing time will inform my future approaches, emphasizing the importance of ongoing collaboration and reflection to enhance student learning outcomes.

References

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.