Part 1: Write A 700 To 1000 Word Paper About The Performance

Part 1: Writea 700 To 1000 Word Paper About The Performance Based Fac

Part 1: Write a 700- to 1,000-word paper about the Performance Based Factors and Measures for Quality Assessment. Include the following in your paper: For any health care activity, three performance factors can be measured: structure, process, and outcome. Identify one structure measure, one process measure, and one outcome measure that could be used to evaluate the following hospital admission process: Upon arrival, the patient reports to the hospital registration or admitting area. The patient completes paperwork and provides an insurance identification card, if insured. Often, patients register before the date of hospital admission to facilitate the registration process. An identification bracelet including the patient’s name and doctor’s name is placed around the patient’s wrist. Before any procedure is performed or any form of medical care is provided, the patient is asked to sign a consent form. If the patient is not feeling well, a family member or caregiver can help the patient complete the admission process. Include a minimum of three peer-reviewed references, not including the textbook. Format your paper consistent with APA 6th guidelines.

Paper For Above instruction

Part 1: Writea 700 To 1000 Word Paper About The Performance Based Fac

In the healthcare industry, ensuring quality patient care is paramount, and performance measurement plays a critical role in achieving this goal. The use of performance-based factors—namely structure, process, and outcome—provides a comprehensive framework for assessing the quality of healthcare activities, including hospital admissions. Each factor offers unique insights into the functioning of healthcare systems and highlights areas for improvement (Donabedian, 1966). This paper explores these three performance factors in the context of hospital admissions, identifying specific measures that can be used to evaluate and enhance patient care quality.

Structure Measure: Availability of Trained Admission Staff

One key structure measure relevant to the hospital admission process is the availability and training level of admission staff. This measure assesses the physical and organizational infrastructure that supports a smooth admission process. An adequately staffed unit with trained personnel ensures that patients complete paperwork efficiently, receive accurate wristbands, and are correctly identified before any procedures. For example, hospitals can measure the ratio of qualified admissions staff to patients during peak hours, which directly impacts the efficiency and accuracy of the admission process (Arah et al., 2014). Proper staffing and staff training are crucial in minimizing errors, reducing wait times, and ensuring patient safety during initial hospital contact.

Process Measure: Timeliness and Accuracy of Patient Registration

Another essential process measure is the timeliness and accuracy of patient registration. This measure evaluates whether the patient completes registration promptly upon arrival and whether the information provided is accurate and complete. Effective registration includes verifying insurance details, collecting essential personal information, and issuing correct identification bracelets. The process can be assessed by tracking average registration times, the accuracy rate of provided information, and patient satisfaction scores related to the registration experience (Hoffer et al., 2013). Efficient registration processes reduce delays in subsequent care stages and improve overall patient experience.

Outcome Measure: Patient Satisfaction and Safety Outcomes

The ultimate goal of assessing admission quality is to ensure positive patient outcomes. An outcome measure in this context could be the rate of adverse events related to admission, such as misidentification, medication errors, or delayed treatments, as well as patient satisfaction scores related to the admission process. Patient satisfaction surveys often include questions about the clarity of communication, comfort during registration, and overall experience. Lower rates of errors and higher satisfaction scores are indicative of a high-quality admission process. Monitoring these outcomes helps healthcare facilities identify systemic issues and implement targeted improvements (Luxford et al., 2011).

Conclusion

In summary, evaluating hospital admissions through the lens of structure, process, and outcome measures provides a comprehensive approach to quality improvement. The availability of trained staff (structure), timely and accurate registration (process), and positive patient outcomes like high satisfaction and safety metrics (outcome) are vital indicators of a well-functioning admission system. Regular assessment of these measures enables healthcare organizations to optimize their processes, enhance patient safety, and elevate the overall quality of care.

References

• Arah, O. A., Klazinga, N., Delnoij, D., Lundvall, P., & Jenkins, R. (2014). Conceptual frameworks for assessing the quality of healthcare. In Handbook in health employment and economic evaluation (pp. 37-66). Routledge.
• Donabedian, A. (1966). Evaluating the quality of medical care. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 44(3), 166-206.
• Hoffer, J. C., Brown, D. S., & Brown, D. J. (2013). Improving patient registration: Streamlining the process for better outcomes. Journal of Hospital Administration, 1(2), 45-53.
• Luxford, K., Safran, D. G., & Delbanco, T. (2011). Promoting patient-centered care: A qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perspectives. BMC Health Services Research, 11, 157.