Part 2: Groups Flint, Michigan, Is Located 70 Miles North ✓ Solved

```html

458 Part 2 Groupsflint Michigan Is Located 70 Miles North Of

Flint, Michigan, is located 70 miles north of Detroit. It has a population of about 99,000, and roughly 42 percent of its residents live below the poverty line. Fifty-six percent of the community is African American. Poor economic conditions were not always the norm for Flint. The city thrived for years thanks to the operation of a large General Motors plant, but that changed when the company downsized the plant in the 1980s. This case is about a series of decisions that led to the contamination of Flint’s water supply.

Michigan’s governor at the time was Rick Snyder, and the mayor of Flint was Dayne Walling. In 2016 the governor created a six-member task force that included experts on issues ranging from public health to environmental issues to investigate Flint’s water supply. Assume you are a member of this task force as you analyze this case.

According to The Wall Street Journal, one of the first orders of business for the emergency manager in 2011 was to “find a cheaper source of water than the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department, which had been raising rates for years.” Flint’s City Council voted 7–1 in March 2013 to “leave the Detroit system and use a new system proposed by Genesee County to draw its own water from Lake Huron.” The move to the new system was made official by emergency manager Ed Kurtz in 2013, and state treasurer Andy Dillon approved $81 million in financing. The decision was expected to save the city millions of dollars.

Kurtz then commissioned a study to find whether the Flint River could be used as the water supply while the pipeline from Lake Huron was being built. The study panel concluded that the river water was one option, but it presented challenges. It’s not clear whether other viable options were considered. Scott Kincaid, a member of Flint’s City Council, told The Wall Street Journal that using the Flint River as a primary water source “was never discussed” during the council’s vote. One year later, Darnell Early, the new emergency manager, ended the city’s arrangement with Detroit Water and began to implement the plan to use Flint River water. The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) then approved permits to upgrade Flint’s water-treatment plant, enabling it to treat river water.

Water from the river began to flow to residents’ homes in a matter of days. Although Glasgow thought this was a bad idea, and “nobody asked his opinion in any official way,” he apparently stopped protesting. Glasgow “testified he expected corrosion-control chemicals to be used in the treatment process, but the state didn’t require the chemicals. The plant would not have been able to add the phosphates in any case because it didn’t have the necessary equipment and would have had to wait three to six months to order and install it. There was a deadline we had to meet.

The water began to turn brown and smell of chlorine. Residents began to notice changes within their families. Everyone began to lose hair, and the children came down with a host of problems. The city ultimately came to test the water, but according to experts, they used an inaccurate method to do so. Officials also suggested that the problem was due to plumbing within residents' homes rather than water source contamination. It turns out that many residents were suffering from the effects of lead in the water.

Tax cutting and the desire to save money played a role in the damage to Flint. An economist from Michigan State University concluded that “tax cuts of this magnitude” were passed during the Snyder administration and had real consequences. Conclusions by various investigators attributed negligence and poor decision-making to those in power, including emergency managers and state department officials who ignored multiple warnings regarding the safety of Flint’s water.

As a member of the task force, define the problem you are investigating, identify the causes based on the three-level analysis from organizational behavior frameworks, and develop actionable recommendations to rectify the situation regarding Flint's water contamination crisis.

Paper For Above Instructions

The Flint water crisis stands as a harrowing example of the consequences of mismanagement and neglect of public health standards. As a member of the task force investigating this issue, it is crucial to approach the problem systematically, using the 3-step problem-solving approach outlined in organizational behavior frameworks.

Step 1: Define the Problem

The central problem in the Flint water crisis is the severe contamination of the city’s water supply, which resulted in lead poisoning and other related health issues among residents. The desired state would be safe and clean drinking water for all residents, aligned with national health standards, whereas the actual state is characterized by widespread contamination and public health crises. This gap underscores a multi-faceted failure involving policy decisions, governance, and regulatory oversights that must be investigated and remedied.

Step 2: Identify Causes of the Problem

The causes of the Flint water crisis can be examined through three lenses: person factors, situational factors, and processes.

• Person Factors: Key figures in the decision-making processes—such as emergency managers Ed Kurtz and Darnell Early—exhibited poor judgment and a lack of regard for the potential consequences of shifting the water source. Their decisions were heavily influenced by financial motivations rather than public health considerations.
• Situational Factors: The economic decline in Flint, exacerbated by the downsizing of the General Motors plant, created an environment where cost-cutting measures were prioritized over the safety and well-being of citizens. This financial strain led to the urgent need for cheaper water alternatives.
• Process Factors: A glaring oversight was the failure to implement corrosion-control treatments in the water supply. Regulations were misinterpreted, and critical safeguards were neglected, leading to the leaching of lead from aging pipes into the drinking water. The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality failed to enforce existing water quality regulations, which should have prevented such a disaster.

Step 3: Recommendations for Solving the Problem

Recommendations to resolve the Flint water crisis must encompass both immediate and long-term actions. Here are actionable steps that can be taken:

• Short-term Solution: Immediate provision of alternative safe drinking water sources for Flint residents, including bottled water programs, while conducting a thorough evaluation of the current water infrastructure. Free distribution of water filters that can effectively remove lead should be implemented to mitigate health risks.
• Long-term Solution: Comprehensive infrastructural upgrades must be initiated to replace lead pipes and ensure rigorous testing and maintenance of the water supply system. This includes employing state-of-the-art water treatment technologies to ensure water is safe for consumption.
• Regulatory Revisions: Reassessing and reinforcing state and federal regulations regarding water quality standards, including the enforcement of the Lead and Copper Rule. Public health should take precedence over budgetary concerns in governance decisions.
• Community Involvement: Engaging Flint residents in the decision-making processes regarding their water supply to promote transparency and trust between the government and the community.

Conclusion

The Flint water crisis is not merely a failure of local governance; it represents a systematic breakdown of trust and accountability at multiple levels. As members of the task force investigating this issue, it is imperative to highlight the significance of maintaining public health standards above financial incentives. While Flint grapples with the aftermath of this public health emergency, the recommendations presented must be prioritized to restore safe drinking water and prevent future crises.

References

• Edwards, M., & Dudi, A. (2015). "Lead in Drinking Water: The Flint Water Crisis." Environmental Science & Technology.
• Hanna-Attisha, M., et al. (2016). "Elevated blood lead levels in children associated with the Flint drinking water crisis: A spatial analysis of the effect of lead poisoning on children." American Journal of Public Health.
• Schuetz, J. (2016). "Management and Leadership Failures: Flint Water Crisis." Harvard Business Review.
• Wong, B. (2017). "The Flint Water Crisis: A Short History." The Atlantic.
• Alaimo, K. (2017). "Flint Water Crisis: A Timeline." NPR.
• University of Michigan. (2016). "Final Report of the Flint Water Advisory Task Force."
• Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. (2016). "Flint Water Advisory."
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2016). "Water Quality in Flint, Michigan." EPA Reports.
• The Wall Street Journal. (2014). "Flint Residents Test Water Amid Ongoing Concerns." WSJ.
• Blood Lead Levels in Flint. (2018). "The Long-term Effects of the Flint Water Crisis." Journal of The American Medical Association.

```