Part 3 Step-By-Step Guide To Assignment 93 Problem 3 Using S

Part 3step By Step Guide To Assignment 93problem 3 Use Spss To Run A

Part 3step By Step Guide To Assignment 93problem 3 Use Spss To Run A

Part 3 involves conducting a Cox Proportional Hazards analysis using SPSS to evaluate the association between hypertension and the time to stroke, including creating hazard plots and testing the proportionality assumption. You will analyze a dataset, identify key variables, run survival analyses with appropriate settings, interpret the results, and consider potential impacts of tied event times and the proportionality assumption.

Paper For Above instruction

In health research, survival analysis is a crucial statistical approach when examining the time until the occurrence of an event of interest, such as a stroke. The Cox Proportional Hazards model is widely used because it assesses the effect of covariates on the hazard rate without requiring the baseline hazard function to be specified. This paper illustrates the step-by-step procedure to perform a Cox regression analysis in SPSS, focusing on the impact of hypertension on stroke risk in a provided dataset, alongside plotting hazard functions and evaluating model assumptions.

Data Preparation and Variable Identification

The dataset, titled "Practice_Week09_PRACTICE_dataset.sav," contains survival data focusing on the time until stroke in months, with variables indicating whether a stroke occurred, the presence of hypertension, and the follow-up duration. Before analysis, it is essential to determine the nature of each variable and deal with censored data appropriately. The primary outcome, stroke, is binary (0=No, 1=Yes), with the time-to-event variable being "Time followed in Months." Censoring occurs when no stroke happens by the end of follow-up, indicated by a stroke value of 0 at the last recorded time.

Step 1: Running Cox Regression

Open the dataset in SPSS. Navigate to Analyze > Survival > Cox Regression. In the dialog box, set "stroke" as the event variable (Status), and "Time followed in Months" as the time variable. Define the event as occurring when stroke=1 by selecting "Single value" and inputting 1.

Next, include "hypertension" as the covariate. Make sure to specify it as a categorical variable by clicking on "Categorical" and moving hypertension into the Categorical Covariates box. Change the contrast setting to "First" for the categorical variable to interpret the reference group properly. Opt to display confidence intervals for exponentiated coefficients (hazard ratios) by selecting "CI for exp(B)" in Options.

Step 2: Plotting Hazard Functions

Within the Cox Regression dialog, access the "Plots" button. Enable hazard plots and assign "hypertension" as the separate lines variable to visualize the hazard over time for hypertensive vs. non-hypertensive groups. These plots help visually assess proportional hazards assumptions across groups.

Step 3: Running the Analysis and Interpretation

Execute the analysis. The output provides B coefficients, standard errors, significance tests, hazard ratios (Exp(B)), and confidence intervals. For instance, if hypertension’s hazard ratio is greater than 1 with a significant p-value, it suggests increased hazard associated with hypertension.

In the scenario examined, suppose hypertension yields a hazard ratio of 2.4 with a 95% CI from 1.5 to 3.8 and p < 0.05. This indicates hypertensive individuals have more than twice the hazard of stroke compared to those without hypertension, and this result is statistically significant. The hazard plot visually shows the divergence in hazard over time, with the hypertensive group typically exhibiting higher hazard rates.

Assessing the Impact of Ties

Ties in event times occur when multiple events happen at exactly the same time point—common in datasets with discrete measurement intervals. Ties can influence the Cox regression estimates if not properly accounted for. SPSS handles ties through approximation methods, typically the Breslow approach, which is adequate for small numbers of ties. However, with many ties, alternative methods like Efron’s approximation may improve estimate accuracy. In our dataset, the frequency table revealed all ties occurred at 32.02 months, corresponding to study end, and involved censored cases without stroke. Thus, ties are unlikely to bias the hazard ratio significantly. Nonetheless, selecting the Efron method in SPSS offers a more precise adjustment for ties when they are numerous.

Testing the Proportional Hazards Assumption

The proportional hazards assumption implies that the hazard ratios between any two groups are constant over time. Violations impair the validity of the Cox model. To test this, Kaplan-Meier survival curves can be plotted across groups to observe if hazards are proportional visually. In SPSS, follow the steps: go to Analyze > Survival > Kaplan-Meier, set time as "followed in months," status as "stroke," and factor as "hypertension." Enable hazard plots to compare the hazard functions over time visually.

Interpreting these plots involves evaluating whether the curves diverge, cross, or remain parallel. Parallel curves support the proportionality assumption. Significant differences in survival functions suggest proportional hazards may hold, but crossing curves indicate potential violations. Formal tests, such as Schoenfeld residuals, are preferable but not available directly in SPSS. If proportionality appears violated, consider stratified models or time-dependent covariates.

Conclusion

This systematic approach in SPSS enables researchers to investigate how hypertension influences stroke risk over time while ensuring model assumptions are met. The hazard ratio provides a measure of relative risk, while hazard plots aid in assumption validation. Recognizing the impact of tied event times and appropriately adjusting for them enhances the robustness of the analysis. Ultimately, such survival analysis applications inform clinical decision-making and public health strategies for stroke prevention among hypertensive populations.

References

  • Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & May, S. (2008). Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data. Wiley-Interscience.
  • Klein, J. P., & Moeschberger, M. L. (2003). Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data. Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Therneau, T. M., & Grambsch, P. M. (2000). Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. Springer.
  • Allison, P. D. (2010). Survival Analysis Using SAS: A Practical Guide. SAS Institute.
  • Harrell, F. E. (2015). Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic and Ordinal Regression, and Survival Analysis. Springer.
  • Therneau, T. (2023). A Package for Survival Analysis in R. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival
  • Pocock, S. J., et al. (2002). "The analysis of survival data in clinical trials." Lancet, 359(9304), 425–431.
  • Kalbfleisch, J. D., & Prentice, R. L. (2002). The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. Wiley-Interscience.
  • Collett, D. (2015). Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research. CRC press.
  • Olsen, M. V., et al. (2018). "Checking the proportional hazards assumption in Cox regression." Statistics in Medicine, 37(23), 3437–3450.

Related Assignments