Part I Read This Article Which Summarizes Kenneth Blanchard

Part Iread This Article Which Summarizes Kenneth Blanchards Seminal W

Read this article which summarizes Kenneth Blanchard’s seminal work on the Interactive Model of Leader-Follower-Situation: Provide a short, 4-6 line, paragraph that summarize the reading. In a short paragraph describe what resonated most with you in this reading. In 1-2 paragraphs describe a situation where a leader was successful with followers in one organization, and not successful in another, citing at least two sources and in-text citations.

Paper For Above instruction

Kenneth Blanchard’s Interactive Model of Leader-Follower-Situation emphasizes the dynamic interaction between leaders, followers, and situational factors that influence leadership effectiveness. This model integrates various leadership styles contingent upon the readiness level of followers, suggesting that effective leadership requires adaptation to the followers’ development stage and the circumstances at hand. It recognizes that leadership is not static but evolves based on real-time interactions, and emphasizes flexibility and responsiveness from leaders to meet their followers’ needs and situational demands.

What resonated most with me in this reading was the emphasis on adaptability in leadership styles. The idea that effective leaders tailor their approaches depending on followers’ readiness and situational context highlights the importance of emotional intelligence and situational awareness. This concept underscores that leadership isn't solely about authority or charisma but also about understanding followers’ capabilities and providing appropriate support or direction accordingly. It underscores the importance of situational responsiveness, which is vital in diverse organizational environments.

In one organization, a leader succeeded by adapting their style to the followers’ development levels, providing high support and direction during a major project transition, thus fostering motivation and trust (Blanchard & Hersey, 1982). Conversely, in another organization, a leader failed to adjust their approach when working with a highly capable team, remaining overly directive and failing to provide autonomy, which resulted in decreased morale and productivity (Northouse, 2018). These examples demonstrate that leadership effectiveness hinges on situational awareness and the ability to flex one's leadership style appropriately (Graeff, 1997).

References

• Blanchard, K., & Hersey, P. (1982). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources. Prentice-Hall.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Graeff, C. L. (1997). Evolution of situational leadership theory: A critical review. Leadership Quarterly, 8(2), 153-170.
• Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.
• Hackman, M. Z., & Johnson, C. E. (2013). Leadership: A communication perspective. Waveland Press.
• Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (1988). The New Leadership: Managing Participation in Organizations. Prentice-Hall.
• Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2003). What We Know About Successful School Leadership. Laboratory for Student Success.
• Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1969). Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources. Prentice-Hall.
• Vandewalle, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2022). Leadership adaptability in dynamic organizations. Journal of Organizational Change, 35(4), 569-582.
• Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.