Pathways Mental Health Psychiatric Patient Evaluation 575150

Pathways Mental Healthpsychiatric Patient Evaluationinstructionsuse Th

Use the following case template to complete Week 2 Assignment 1. On page 5, assign DSM-5-TR and Updated ICD-10 codes to the services documented. You will add your narrative answers to the assignment questions to the bottom of this template and submit altogether as one document. Identifying Information was verified by stating their name and date of birth. Time spent for evaluation: 0900am-0957am. The patient is a 25-year-old Russian female evaluated for psychiatric concerns, referred from her retiring provider, with a history of PTSD, ADHD, and stimulant use disorder in remission. She is currently prescribed fluoxetine 20mg daily for PTSD and atomoxetine 80mg daily for ADHD.

Her presenting complaints include increased irritability, frustration, difficulty focusing, sleep disturbances with nightmares, decreased appetite, social isolation, and somatic concerns (GI upset and headaches). She denies suicidal ideation (SI)/homicidal ideation (HI), psychosis, current substance cravings, or recent substance use. Past psychiatric history includes trauma from sexual assault, with prior diagnoses of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), PTSD, stimulant use disorder, and ADHD. Her substance use history includes alcohol (social drinking), cannabis, cocaine (last used in 2015), and recreational drugs like ecstasy.

Her psychosocial history notes early life trauma, raised by adoptive parents since age 6, with uncertain family relationships. She is single, employed, with high school education, and reports a stable support system. She has a history of medication trials, with some adverse reactions, and previous hospitalizations for psychiatric reasons. Mental health screening indicates minimal depression, mild anxiety, and negative screening for bipolar disorder. She is assessed as low risk for suicide, with protective factors including social support, insight, and resourcefulness.

The mental status exam describes her as cooperative, appropriately dressed, alert, with normal speech, fair concentration, and calm mood with anxious and irritable affect. No psychosis or suicidal/homicidal ideation observed. Cognitively intact, with good insight and judgment. Her thought process is ruminative but goal-directed.

In the clinical impression, her symptoms are consistent with PTSD, ongoing subsyndromal ADHD, and generalized anxiety. She denies current suicidal or homicidal thoughts and has the capacity to make decisions about her care.

The treatment plan includes increasing fluoxetine to 40mg daily, continuing atomoxetine 80mg daily, and monitoring for symptom improvement and adverse effects. Patient education covered medication risks, side effects, interactions, and importance of adherence. Referral to therapy services was made, with emphasis on safety planning and emergency contacts. Follow-up is scheduled in 30 days. The patient understands and agrees with the plan.

Paper For Above instruction

When documenting psychiatric assessments, it is essential to include comprehensive information that supports accurate DSM-5-TR and ICD-10 coding. Typically, pertinent documentation involves detailed patient history, present mental health symptoms, current medication regimens, past psychiatric and substance use history, psychosocial factors, mental status examination findings, diagnoses, treatment plans, and risk assessments. Precise documentation of symptom severity, duration, and functional impact aids in distinguishing between different diagnostic categories, which is crucial for appropriate coding and billing. Additionally, recording the rationale for medication adjustments, referrals, and safety plans reinforces the clinical reasoning behind treatment decisions and supports proper reimbursement.

In the case scenario, some pertinent documentation is missing or insufficient to support specific DSM-5-TR or ICD-10 codes. For instance, while current symptoms of hyperarousal and re-experiencing are documented, detailed symptom frequency, severity, and impairment levels are lacking. This detail is important to distinguish between different PTSD subtypes or severity levels (e.g., acute vs. chronic). Furthermore, the record does not specify whether the patient's ADHD symptoms presently meet full criteria or are residual, which impacts coding for ADHD. Additional information, such as specific diagnostic criteria met during evaluation, comorbidities, and functional impairment, would narrow coding options for billing purposes.

To optimize documentation for coding and reimbursement, clinicians should adopt a structured approach, systematically recording symptom details aligned with DSM-5-TR criteria, including onset, duration, severity, and impact on daily functioning. Incorporating standardized assessment tools, like validated scales or symptom inventories, can provide objective evidence supporting diagnoses. Clearly documenting the rationale for medication choices, doses, and adjustments also supports medical necessity. Moreover, including detailed psychosocial factors, treatment engagement, and safety assessments ensures comprehensive records that facilitate accurate coding and maximize reimbursement while complying with payer requirements.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.; DSM-5-TR). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  • World Health Organization. (2019). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (10th ed., ICD-10). WHO Press.
  • Maree, R. (2020). Effective documentation in mental health nursing: Supporting accurate coding. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(15-16), 2907-2914.
  • Chaudhury, P., & Mishra, V. (2018). Documentation and coding in mental health practice: Legal and ethical considerations. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 60(4), 353-360.
  • Gabbard, G. O. (2014). Textbook of psychotherapy (4th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
  • Kodali, S., & Allen, R. (2017). Psychiatric diagnosis coding: Ensuring accuracy and compliance. Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, 23(10), 1060-1066.
  • Hales, R. E., & Yudofsky, S. C. (Eds.). (2014). Textbook of psychiatry (7th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
  • Greenberg, R. (2019). Clinical documentation in psychiatric practice: Improving accuracy and reimbursement. Psychiatry Journal, 2019, 1-7.
  • Sullivan, G., & Clancy, S. (2021). Enhancing clinical documentation for mental health billing: Strategies and best practices. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 27(2), 75-81.
  • American Medical Association. (2022). CPT® Professional Edition. AMA Press.