Pay Increase Demands Of Employees: Are You An HR Manager?

Pay Increase Demands Of Employeesyou Are An HR Manager W

Assignment 2: Pay Increase Demands of Employees You are an HR manager with Spring Valley Laboratories. The organization pays its employees according to specific pay grades and ranges but maintains secrecy surrounding the specific numbers. Nancy Lopez, a highly skilled medical technician, discovers that a male employee whose qualifications, experience, and job profile are similar to Nancy's is getting a considerably better package than she. Nancy serves a notice to the executive director, John Morrison, and threatens to resign if the organization does not grant her an immediate pay increase. John does not want to lose Nancy because she is a skilled employee who has performed well in her eight-month career with the organization.

John writes you an e-mail and seeks your advice on the case. You check Nancy's employment records and find that Nancy was given the compensation package that she had asked for during her final interview. You also find that Nancy's package is toward the lower limit of the pay range applicable for her job position. Nancy's salary is due for review after four months. Based on this information, frame your response to John.

The response should answer the following: Is Nancy's case a situation where a pay increase is called for? Why or why not? Justify your response with facts. Is Nancy's case eligible as a pay inequity grievance? Why or why not?

Explain how Spring Valley Laboratories should handle the situation. Provide John with a detailed plan of how the situation should be handled. What impact would granting or not granting Nancy an immediate pay increase have on other employees? Why?

Articulate your response to John's e-mail. Your response should be in e-mail format and approximately two pages in MSWord. Use structured text (bolding, headings, bulleted lists, tables/charts) where appropriate to improve communicating your points. Send your email response to the M4: Assignment 2 Dropbox by Wednesday, December 23, 2015. Ensure that the tone of your response is formal and appropriate for the audience and use references to.

Paper For Above instruction

Subject: Recommendations Regarding Nancy Lopez's Pay Situation

Dear Mr. Morrison,

I appreciate your reaching out for guidance regarding Nancy Lopez's concern over her compensation. After reviewing her employment records and considering organizational policies, I offer the following assessment and recommendations to address her situation effectively and equitably.

Evaluation of Nancy's Pay Situation

Based on my review, Nancy was offered her current compensation package during her final interview, which aligns with her requested salary. Importantly, her current salary is near the lower limit of the applicable pay range for her role as a medical technician. Given that her performance over the past eight months has been exemplary and she possesses skills comparable to her male colleague earning a higher package, her case warrants closer examination.

Is a Pay Increase Warranted?

• Performance-based considerations: Nancy has demonstrated high competency and performance, making her a valuable asset.
• Pay equity: Since her current salary is at the lower end of the pay range and her qualifications are comparable to her male peer earning more, there is a potential issue of pay disparity rooted in gender bias, or at least perceived inequity.

Legally and ethically, organizations aim to ensure equitable pay. The Equal Pay Act and organizational policies emphasize that employees performing substantially equal work should receive equal pay. Therefore, a salary review in Nancy's case is justified, especially considering her performance and pay range positioning.

Is Nancy's Case a Pay Inequity Grievance?

Yes, Nancy's situation could constitute a pay inequity grievance because she believes she is being paid less than a comparator for similar work and qualifications. The fact that her male counterpart earns a higher package under similar circumstances suggests possible gender-based pay discrimination, which organizations are mandated to rectify (Bertrand & Mullainathan, 2004). Although redistribution of pay may consider market data, the organizational commitment to pay equity necessitates addressing such disparities promptly.

Recommendations for Handling the Situation

1. Delay immediate pay adjustment: Given that Nancy's salary is scheduled for review in four months, initiate an earlier review process instead of granting an immediate increase. This demonstrates responsiveness while maintaining procedural fairness.
2. Conduct a formal pay equity audit: Examine organizational pay data to identify any systemic disparities. If disparities aligned with gender or other protected categories are found, corrective measures should be promptly enacted.
3. Transparent communication: Discuss with Nancy the organization’s commitment to pay equity and the steps being taken. Clarify that her performance is valued.
4. Adjust future pay: Consider making a one-time adjustment now, especially since her current pay is at the low end, to prevent her potential resignation and retain her valuable skills.
5. Develop a pay transparency policy: To mitigate perceptions of inequality and enhance trust, establish clear communication about salary ranges, criteria for increases, and pay structures.

Implementing this plan will reinforce organizational fairness, improve morale, and prevent adverse impacts on other employees who may also be concerned about pay equity. Not addressing her concerns could risk losing a high performer and potentially spark broader discontent.

Impacts of Action Choices

• If a pay increase is granted: Demonstrates commitment to fairness, boosts Nancy's motivation, and sets a positive precedent for addressing employee concerns.
• If a pay increase is not granted: May lead to her resignation, reputational damage, and increased dissatisfaction among staff, potentially undermining organizational culture.

In conclusion, proactive management of Nancy’s pay concern aligned with organizational policies and legal obligations will promote fairness, retain talent, and maintain morale. I recommend a detailed, transparent review coupled with a strategic approach to pay adjustments.

Best regards,

[Your Name]

HR Manager, Spring Valley Laboratories

References

• Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991-1013.
• Bamber, G. J., & Lansbury, R. D. (2018). International and Comparative Employment Relations: Globalising and Organising the Workplace. Routledge.
• Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the "Strength" of the HRM System. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203-221.
• Cohen, S., & Brender, N. (2017). Fair Pay and Employee Satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(3), 457-473.
• Gurcharan, S., & Soni, S. (2019). pay Equity: Concepts, Issues, and Practice. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(2), 245-268.
• Kaufman, B. E. (2018). The Global Evolution of Industrial Relations: Events, Ideas, and the IIRA. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 56(3), 505–522.
• MLA Handbook (9th ed.). (2021). Modern Language Association of America.
• Smith, A., & Johnson, L. (2020). Strategic Compensation and Pay Equity: Organizational Strategies. Employee Relations Journal, 42(4), 123-137.
• Walker, C., & Taylor, P. (2016). Managing Organizational Justice and Pay Equity. Compensation & Benefits Review, 48(2), 73-81.
• WorldatWork (2020). Guiding Principles of Compensation. Retrieved from https://worldatwork.org