PD 300578 Lecture 12 Exam Discussion: Provide An Integrated ✓ Solved

PD 300578 Lecture 12 Exam Discussion: Provide an integrated

PD 300578 Lecture 12 Exam Discussion: Provide an integrated study guide and analysis for the final exam, covering Module 1 Ethics and Professional Code of Conduct, Module 2 Project Management, Module 3 Legal, Social, Environmental Issues and Quality Assurance/IT Compliance, and On-demand ICT graduate skills; outline exam structure and passing criteria, and summarize group assignment requirements; include practice questions with guidance.

Paper For Above Instructions

The Exam Discussion for PD 300578 is designed to test a student’s ability to integrate ethical reasoning, project management practice, compliance awareness, and transferable ICT skills into coherent professional practice. A strong study approach centers on understanding how Module 1 ethics intersects with professional codes of conduct, how Module 2 disciplines drive successful ICT project outcomes, and how Module 3 law, social considerations, environmental factors, and quality assurance shape responsible IT delivery. Research-based standards and codes (such as the ACM/IEEE Code of Ethics and the ACS Code of Ethics) provide a framework for evaluating decisions in ethically charged situations (ACM/IEEE, 2018). These standards guide not only exam answers but everyday professional conduct (ACS, 2014).

Module 1—Ethics and Professional Code of Conduct emphasizes legal aspects of ICT crime, property damage, fraud, bad advice, incompetence, contract law, and fair trade practices, within the context of ICT professional ethics. A rigorous response on exam questions should reference well-established codes and reflect ethical decision-making models. The ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct (with its emphasis on public interest, honesty, fairness, and professional responsibility) remains a central reference point for ICT professionals (ACM/IEEE, 2018). Additionally, the Australian Computer Society’s Code of Ethics offers regionally relevant expectations and norms that may feature in Australian-context questions (ACS, 2014).

Module 2—Project Management covers the lifecycle from proposal to delivery, including the creation of a project proposal and a robust business case, stakeholder management, and the development of a work breakdown structure (WBS) with time and cost estimates. Core PMBOK guidance (7th edition) emphasizes tailoring standards to project context and maintaining clear communications as a key success driver (PMI, 2021). Practical exam answers should demonstrate familiarity with CPM/critical path concepts, budgeting, risk management, and continuous process improvement, as well as leadership and teamwork. In the broader PM literature, Kerzner’s systems approach to planning and control remains a foundational reference for seeing how integration, scope management, and quality assurance align to project outcomes (Kerzner, 2017).

Module 3—Legal, Social, Environmental Issues and Quality Assurance/IT Compliance focuses on issues such as intellectual property protection (trademarks, designs), regulatory compliance, usability, and quality assurance of IT applications. Intellectual property protections are central to software development and ICT innovations, and understanding IP types and protections is essential for exam responses (WIPO, 2012). On the quality front, organizations align with standards such as ISO 9001 for quality management systems (ISO, 2015) and ISO/IEC 25010 for product quality models (ISO/IEC 25010, 2011). IT security considerations align with ISO/IEC 27001 for information security management, and with practical frameworks like the NIST Cybersecurity Framework for risk-based protection and compliance (NIST, 2018). For system usability and QA effectiveness, established usability principles (e.g., Nielsen’s usability heuristics) underpin strong exam answers about user-centered design and evaluation (Nielsen & Molich, 1990).

On-demand ICT graduate skills—communication, problem solving, teamworking, and innovation—translate theory into employable practice. These soft skills underpin successful project delivery, stakeholder engagement, and cross-functional collaboration, which are repeatedly emphasized in PMI guidance and in professional ethics discussions (PMI, 2021; ACM/IEEE, 2018). The ability to articulate ideas clearly, justify decisions with evidence, and reflect on ethical implications strengthens both exam performance and professional readiness (NIST, 2018). In short, the exam expects students to connect technical knowledge with ethical judgment, regulatory awareness, and effective communication.

Exam structure and strategic preparation are essential to success. The exam is typically structured into three parts: a multiple-choice section testing factual recall and concepts; a short-answer section requiring concise explanations and application of standards; and a long-answer section demanding integrated, critical analysis and justification of recommendations. Although the specifics may vary, students should practice mapping theoretical constructs to real-world ICT scenarios, justify choices with established standards, and demonstrate awareness of legal and ethical constraints. Time management during the 2-hour window, careful reading of instructions, and neatly presented responses are repeatedly highlighted as exam expectations (Course guidelines). These elements align with professional standards for analysis and documentation across IT practice (ISO 9001, ISO/IEC 27001, PMI, 2021).

Practice Questions and Guidance

Sample questions reflect the core topics likely to appear on the exam. For example, explain what intellectual property is and list four types of IP protection, citing relevant IP frameworks (WIPO, 2012). Another typical prompt asks why there may be a need to shorten a project schedule and what strategies a project manager would employ, framed within your group project brief (PMI, 2021). A third question may ask you to discuss the role of a project manager, the importance of stakeholder management, and the communication channels used in project governance (Kerzner, 2017).

To prepare effectively, students should align their study with the mandatory assessment components: module tutorials, the group project (and accompanying peer assessment forms), and the final exam. Consistent preparation across modules, integration of ethical reasoning with project management methods, and demonstrated understanding of regulatory and QA standards are critical for achieving at least the required threshold to pass (Course guidelines). Finally, engaging with the feedback mechanisms and ensuring preparedness for the online/onsite exam context reinforces performance under time pressure and helps translate knowledge into professional capability (ACM/IEEE, 2018).

In sum, success in the PD 300578 exam rests on a balanced mastery of ethics, project management techniques, legal/regulatory awareness, usability and QA concepts, and transferable workplace skills. By studying the codes of ethics, applying PMBOK-aligned methods, understanding IP and regulatory requirements, and practicing structured written responses, students can demonstrate both competence and professional judgment in the final assessment (PMI, 2021; ISO, 2015; ISO/IEC 27001, 2013; WIPO, 2012; NIST, 2018; Nielsen & Molich, 1990; ISO/IEC 25010, 2011; Kerzner, 2017; ACS, 2014; ACM/IEEE, 2018).

References

  • ACM/IEEE Computer Society. (2018). ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. ACM.
  • Australian Computer Society. (2014). ACS Code of Ethics. ACS.
  • International Organization for Standardization. (2015). ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems. ISO.
  • International Organization for Standardization. (2013). ISO/IEC 27001:2013 Information technology — Security techniques — Information security management systems — Requirements. ISO.
  • International Organization for Standardization. (2011). ISO/IEC 25010:2011 Systems and software engineering — Systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE) — System and software product quality models. ISO.
  • Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic Evaluation of User Interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
  • NIST. (2018). Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity. NIST.
  • Project Management Institute. (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (7th ed.). PMI.
  • World Intellectual Property Organization. (2012). Intellectual Property: A Core Asset for Innovation. WIPO.
  • Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.

Related Assignments