Perform Calculations And Answer Questions Related To Capital ✓ Solved

perform calculations and answer questions related to capital

Perform calculations and answer questions related to capital budgeting. In this assessment, you will explore capital budgeting, which is the process of evaluating the feasibility and selection of investment projects. You will examine basic capital budgeting techniques, such as payback, discounted payback, net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), profitability index (PI), and modified internal rate of return (MIRR).

This assessment focuses on capital budgeting calculations.

Complete and submit the Assessment 5 Template [XLSX].

Paper For Above Instructions

Capital budgeting is a crucial aspect of financial management, involving the evaluation of investment opportunities to determine their potential returns and risks. In this paper, we will analyze several capital budgeting problems, calculating key financial metrics, and discussing their implications for decision-making in a corporate context.

Understanding Capital Budgeting Techniques

The primary methods of capital budgeting include Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Payback Period, and Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR). Each of these techniques offers unique insights into the viability of investment projects, allowing organizations to allocate resources effectively.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV)

The NPV method assesses the profitability of an investment by calculating the present value of expected cash inflows discounted back to the present using the cost of capital. A positive NPV indicates that the project is expected to generate more value than its cost, making it a worthy investment.

For example, consider Project Y with initial cash flows as follows: Year 0: -$8, Year 1: $3, Year 2: $4, Year 3: $1, Year 4: $300. Given a cost of capital of 10%, the NPV can be calculated using the formula:

NPV = CF0 + (CF1 / (1 + r)^1) + (CF2 / (1 + r)^2) + (CF3 / (1 + r)^3) + (CF4 / (1 + r)^4)

Substituting the values yields:

NPV = -$8 + ($3 / (1 + 0.10)^1) + ($4 / (1 + 0.10)^2) + ($1 / (1 + 0.10)^3) + ($300 / (1 + 0.10)^4)

This calculation results in an NPV of approximately $268.43, indicating the project should be accepted since the NPV is greater than zero.

Calculating Payback Period

The payback period is the time it takes for an investment to generate cash flows sufficient to recover its initial cost. For Project X, with the following cash flows: Year 0: -$1, Year 1: $100, the cumulative cash flow reaches positive territory within the first year of operation. Given a maximum acceptable payback period of four years, this project can also be accepted.

Analyzing IRR

The IRR is the discount rate that makes the NPV of a project equal to zero. For two mutually exclusive projects we might calculate the IRR as follows:

Cash Flow A: Year 0: -$50,000, Year 1: $15,625, Year 2: $15,625, Year 3: $15,625, Year 4: $15,625. The IRR can be computed using an Excel formula or financial calculator, which yields an IRR that we must compare against the cost of capital (10%) to determine relative desirability.

If IRR exceeds the cost of capital, the project is considered viable.

MIRR Consideration

MIRR improves on IRR by assuming reinvestment at the firm’s cost of capital instead of the IRR itself, providing a more accurate measure of an investment’s profitability. In a scenario with a project cost of $65,000 and expected inflows of $12,000 annually for 9 years, the MIRR can be computed to inform the investment decision accurately.

Comparison of Capital Budgeting Methods

When comparing NPV, IRR, and MIRR, NPV is often regarded as the most reliable metric, as it directly considers the value added to the firm in today’s dollars. However, IRR and MIRR can provide useful perspectives when assessing multiple projects or when cash flows are non-conventional. Each method has its merits, and the choice between them depends on the specific financial context and objectives of the business.

Conclusion

Ultimately, capital budgeting is about the informed evaluation of investment opportunities to ensure that resources are allocated in a manner that maximizes shareholder value. By mastering these techniques, financial professionals contribute significantly to their organizations' long-term sustainability and growth.

References

• Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2016). Financial Management: Theory and Practice. Cengage Learning.
• Block, S. B., & Hirt, G. A. (2019). Foundations of Financial Management. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Damodaran, A. (2010). Applied Corporate Finance. Wiley.
• Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2013). The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Financial Economics.
• Koller, T., Goedhart, M., & Wessels, D. (2015). Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies. Wiley.
• Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R., & Jaffe, J. (2016). Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Van Horne, J. C., & Wachowicz, J. M. (2013). Fundamentals of Financial Management. Pearson Education.
• White, G. I., Sondhi, A. J., & Fried, D. (2014). The Analysis and Use of Financial Statements. Wiley.
• Paramasivan, C. & Subramanian, T. (2016). Financial Management. New Age International.
• Shapiro, A. C. (2013). Multinational Financial Management. Wiley.