Performance-Based Assessment Planning Instruction Part 1 ✓ Solved

Performance Based Assessmentplanning Instruction Part 1this Project I

This project requires you to write two lesson plan introductions aligned to the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) for your content area and grade level. For each lesson plan, you must:

- Copy the relevant TEKS verbatim, including grade level, number, and competency letter.

- Develop an assessment or performance measure that accurately evaluates whether students have mastered the content at the rigor specified in the TEKS.

- Formulate a clear, student-friendly learning objective statement that includes the performance measure.

- Explain to students the learning target in understandable terms and how it will be measured.

- Describe the purpose of learning the material, emphasizing how it benefits students in the content area and real life.

- Connect the lesson to prior knowledge and background, facilitating meaningful learning and cross-content connections.

You will submit two separate documents, each representing one lesson plan introduction. Each must demonstrate adherence to the standards and scoring criteria. You need to score at least 48 out of 60 points on each to pass the project, with an overall passing score of 80% or higher on both submissions. The project aligns with Texas Educator Standards and is essential for preservice certification.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

In designing effective lesson plans that meet the Texas Educational Standards, it is crucial to align learning objectives with the TEKS and create assessments that measure mastery at the requisite rigor. For this example, I will construct a lesson plan for sixth-grade mathematics, focusing on TEKS 6.B., which states that students should be able to "solve real-world and mathematical problems by writing and solving equations." This standard emphasizes both procedural skills and application, demanding a rigorous learning objective and corresponding assessment.

First, I will copying the TEKS verbatim: (Grade 6) 6.B. Solve real-world and mathematical problems by writing and solving equations. This encompasses the need for students to interpret and construct equations based on contextual problems, demonstrating not only procedural fluency but also understanding of the underlying concepts.

Next, the assessment or performance measure will involve students independently solving a set of contextual problems and explaining their reasoning process. For example, the task could include solving problems like: "A rectangle’s length is twice its width. If the perimeter is 24 units, what are the dimensions of the rectangle?" The students’ ability to formulate and solve the related equations correctly will serve as the assessment of mastery, aligned with the TEKS’s rigor.

The learning objective in student-friendly language will be: "Today, you will learn how to set up and solve equations based on real-world problems, like finding the dimensions of a rectangle when given certain clues. We will measure your understanding by your ability to correctly write and solve these equations for different scenarios." This transparent statement helps students grasp what they are expected to do and how their success will be evaluated.

To explain the purpose of learning this content, I would say: "Understanding how to translate real-world situations into equations helps you solve everyday problems more effectively. It also deepens your understanding of how algebraic concepts apply to the world around you, which is a key skill in many careers and daily activities."

Finally, I will connect this lesson to prior knowledge by reminding students of earlier lessons on basic algebraic operations and solving simple equations. I might say: "Last week, we learned how to solve simple algebraic equations. Today, we're going to build on that by translating real-world problems into equations, which makes solving them even more meaningful."

This comprehensive approach ensures that each component—from TEKS alignment to student understanding—is addressed thoroughly, promoting effective and standards-based instruction.

References

  • Texas Education Agency. (2023). Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). https://texas.gov/TEKS
  • Marzano, R. J. (2007). The Art and Science of Teaching. ASCD.
  • Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. ASCD.
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners. ASCD.
  • McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2012). Facilitating Understanding. The Learning & Teaching Series.
  • Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. Pearson.
  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.
  • National Institute for Literacy. (2008). Developing Literacy in the Content Areas. NIFL.
  • Guskey, T. R. (2007). Using Assessments to Improve Teaching and Learning. ASCD.
  • Danielson, C. (2013). The Quadruple Aim of Teacher Evaluation. ASCD.

Related Assignments