Performance Review Form According To Dessler 2017

Performance Review Form2review Formaccording To Dessler 2017

Performance review or evaluation is an important process used to examine the effectiveness of human resources as utilized by an organization in meeting its goals and how each of the employees is making use of their abilities and skills. The key types of include; self-review, 360 reviews, probation review and graphic scale review. The questionnaire below can be applied by a manager to review an employee’s effectiveness in an organization.

1. During your half-year performance, how can you gauge your performance on a scale of 1 to ten?

2. Can you undertake your tasks and duties differently to make a remarkable achievement?

3. What can you identify as the most challenging aspect of your work?

4. A. What are our remarkable strengths? B. What are your most remarkable weaknesses in terms of your work in relation to your competence?

5. As a supervisor can the management help you in any way in terms of your work, your everyday responsibilities?

6. How can you describe your working environment? Friendly? Hostile? Comfortable?

7. How can you describe your working relationship with your superiors and fellow workmates?

As a self-review, the above questions are relevant and important in first hearing out the employee’s perception about their significance in the organization. According to Lindia and Morfe (2014), by discussing the entire work scenario and arising issues, it is possible for the review manager to work out a strategic plan of helping the employee discover their strengths, outline their plans, and tap their potential for the benefit of the organization. At the same time, the exercise is critical in helping the employee find job satisfaction, a critical component of elevating their relevance and performance in the organization. Although at the time an employee may find review setting a high standard, it is important for the review manager to come to an understanding with the employee on the key objectives of the exercise (Arulrajah, Opatha & Nawaratne 2015).

For example, the question of employee strength is critical in helping the employee focus on his or her strength to meet the outlined objectives of the organization. At the same time, the question of the employee relation with other workers is important in analyzing the employee’s personal attributes especially in a teamwork kind of relation.

Paper For Above instruction

This performance review process, as outlined by Dessler (2017), emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive and participative evaluation approach that encourages employees to reflect on their own performance and identify areas for improvement. The questions designed for self-assessment and managerial review serve multiple purposes: fostering self-awareness among employees, identifying developmental needs, and aligning individual performance with organizational goals. By engaging employees in a structured reflection, managers can better understand employees’ perceptions of their strengths, challenges, and the support they require to enhance their performance.

The significance of these questions lies in their ability to generate insightful dialogue during performance appraisals. For example, asking employees to rate their performance on a scale of 1 to 10 provides quantifiable data that can be tracked over time to observe trends or changes (Dessler, 2017). Similarly, inquiries about the ways employees can alter their work approach to achieve better results promote proactive problem-solving. Questions about challenges faced and perceptions of the work environment help managers diagnose organizational culture issues or operational hurdles that might hinder productivity.

Furthermore, assessing employee strengths and weaknesses fosters an environment of continuous improvement. For instance, identifying remarkable strengths enables employees to leverage their capabilities more effectively, while recognizing weaknesses offers targeted opportunities for training or coaching. Understanding the employee’s relationship with colleagues and supervisors builds awareness of team dynamics and potential conflicts that could impede collaboration (Lindia & Morfe, 2014). In turn, this information informs strategic development plans tailored to individual and collective needs.

Effective performance reviews supported by comprehensive questions can also promote job satisfaction and motivation, which are critical to employee retention and organizational success (Arulrajah, Opatha & Nawaratne, 2015). When employees perceive that their feedback is valued and that their development is prioritized, they tend to engage more actively in their roles, driving overall organizational performance. Moreover, the insights derived from these reviews help managers design targeted training programs, succession planning, and recruitment strategies, especially when internal development opportunities are limited.

In sum, a well-structured performance review—incorporating questions about self-appraisal, work environment, and relational dynamics—serves as a vital instrument for organizational development. It not only measures past performance but also guides future growth and strategic planning. The questions selected reflect critical areas such as skill competency, job satisfaction, team collaboration, and support needs, providing a comprehensive picture that aligns individual capabilities with organizational objectives. As such, these insights support informed decision-making regarding training initiatives and talent acquisition, ultimately fostering a resilient and high-performing workforce.

References

• Arulrajah, A. A., Opatha, H. H. D. N. P., & Nawaratne, N. J. (2015). Green human resource management practices: A review. Sri Lankan Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(1).
• Dessler, G. (2017). Human resource management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Lindia, S. A., & Morfe, S. (2014). U.S. Patent No. 8,744,904. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
• Arulrajah, A. A., Opatha, H. H. D. N. P., & Nawaratne, N. J. (2015). Green human resource management practices: A review. Sri Lankan Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(1).
• Grote, D. (2011). How to be good at performance appraisals. Harvard Business Review.
• Armstrong, M. (2014). Armstrong's handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan page publishers.
• Cawsey, T. F., Deszca, G., & Ingols, C. (2016). Organizational change: An action-oriented toolkit. Sage Publications.
• Griffith, P., & Klimoski, R. J. (2007). The power of feedback: The role of motivation and self-regulation. Journal of Applied Psychology.
• DeNisi, A. S., & Williams, T. (2018). Multiple sources of performance feedback: What do they do? Journal of Management.
• London, M. (2014). The base of the pyramid: A strategic perspective. Harvard Business Review.