Personal Work Group Evaluation Scoring Guide

Personal Work Group Evaluation Scoring Guide

Describe the characteristics of a group. Does not identify the characteristics of a group. Lists characteristics of a group, but does not describe the impact on communication. Describe the characteristics of a group. Describes the characteristics of a group and analyzes the impact on communication.Analyze the roles of group members. Does not analyze the roles of group members. Identifies the roles of group members, but does not describe the impact on group communication. Analyzes the roles of group members. Analyzes the roles of group members and the impact on communication within the group.Describe the group stages experienced. Does not identify the group stages experienced. Lists the group stages experienced, but does not describe their significance. Describes the group stages experienced. Describes the stages the group experienced and changes in communication throughout stages.Analyze group norms. Does not identify group norms. Identifies group norms, but does not describe the impact on organizational communication. Analyzes group norms. Analyzes group norms and the impact on organizational communication.Describe positive and negative participation behaviors. Does not describe positive and negative participation behaviors. Describes positive or negative participation behaviors but not both. Describes positive and negative participation behaviors. Describes positive and negative participation behaviors and describes their impact on communication.Describe the group's use of technology for communication. Does not identify the group's use of technology for communication. Lists ways the group uses technology for communication, but does not describe its significance or intended purpose. Describes the group's use of technology for communication. Describes the group's use of technology for communication and assesses the effectiveness of the group's use of technology for communication.Write clearly to convey the intended content and follow APA rules for attributing sources. Writing does not clearly convey the intended content or does not follow APA rules for attributing sources. Writing conveys the intended content and follows APA rules for attributing sources, but is inconsistent in terms of clarity and organization. Writes clearly to convey the intended content and follow APA rules for attributing sources. Writing conveys the intended content, is consistently clear and well- organized, and follows APA rules for attributing sources.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Effective teamwork and collaboration are fundamental components in organizational success. Understanding team dynamics involves analyzing various factors such as group characteristics, roles, stages, norms, participation behaviors, and communication technologies. This paper evaluates these aspects based on a hypothetical or real group scenario, providing insight into how they influence communication and overall group effectiveness.

Characteristics of a Group and Its Impact on Communication

A group can be characterized as a collection of individuals who interact, influence one another, and share goals or interests. Characteristics include size, diversity, cohesion, and interdependence (Forsyth, 2010). These features directly impact communication, as larger groups might face more complexity, while highly cohesive groups tend to communicate more fluidly. Diversity introduces multiple perspectives, which can enrich discussions but may also lead to misunderstandings if not managed properly (LePine, 2016). Understanding these traits helps elucidate how group dynamics shape communication patterns, affecting group performance.

Roles of Group Members and Their Impact on Communication

Group roles, such as leader, facilitator, or challenger, delineate expected behaviors and influence the interaction patterns within the team (Belbin, 2010). For example, a dominant leader may facilitate decision-making, but if their approach suppresses contributions from others, communication can become hierarchical and restricted. Conversely, a facilitator's role encourages participation, fostering openness and collaborative dialogue. Analyzing these roles highlights their impact on the flow of information, coordination, and conflict resolution within the group.

Stages of Group Development and Changes in Communication

Groups typically go through stages such as forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning (Tuckman, 1965). During forming, communication is cautious and polite as members get acquainted. The storming phase involves conflicts and power struggles, often leading to tense interactions. Norming sees the establishment of norms and more cohesive communication. Performance is characterized by open and effective dialogue focused on task completion. Finally, adjourning may involve reflections and closure discussions. Recognizing these stages enables understanding of the evolving communication patterns and necessary adaptations for effective group functioning.

Analysis of Group Norms and Organizational Communication

Group norms are unwritten rules guiding behavior and interaction (Schwartz, 2013). Norms such as punctuality, participation levels, and conflict resolution styles significantly influence organizational communication. For instance, a norm favoring open expression facilitates transparency, whereas restrictive norms can inhibit dialogue. Analyzing norms reveals their role in establishing expectations and maintaining a conducive environment for effective communication.

Positive and Negative Participation Behaviors and Their Effects

Participation behaviors encompass contributions like active listening, constructive feedback, as well as withdrawn or disruptive actions. Positive behaviors, such as sharing ideas and supportive communication, promote inclusiveness and productivity (McCroskey & McCroskey, 2006). Negative behaviors, including monopolizing discussions or ignoring others' input, hinder collaboration and can cause misunderstandings. Identifying these behaviors and their impact highlights areas for fostering a healthier communication climate within the group.

Use of Technology for Group Communication and Its Effectiveness

Modern groups utilize various technological tools like email, video conferencing, and collaborative platforms to communicate (Larson et al., 2014). The effectiveness of these tools depends on factors such as accessibility, user skills, and appropriateness for tasks. For example, video conferencing enables real-time interaction but may be limited by bandwidth issues, while collaborative platforms promote asynchronous collaboration but require discipline to maintain engagement. Assessing technology use involves examining how these tools enhance or impede communication effectiveness.

Conclusion

Analyzing the characteristics, roles, stages, norms, participation behaviors, and communication technologies offers a comprehensive understanding of group dynamics. Recognizing how these elements influence communication can inform strategies to improve group performance and organizational communication effectiveness.

References

• Belbin, R. M. (2010). Team roles at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Forsyth, D. R. (2010). Group dynamics (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
• Larson, J. R., Jain, P., & Davis, T. (2014). Technology and team communication. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(3), 445-468.
• LePine, J. A. (2016). Adaptability, flexible team processes, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(7), 1021–1032.
• McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (2006). Communication & personality: Trait communication anxiety. Pearson Education.
• Schwartz, S. H. (2013). Normative influence and social norms. Journal of Social Psychology, 152(4), 459-474.
• Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399.