Petersen Peterson Company Is A 6-Year-Old Company Founded By

Petersen Peterson Company Is A 6 Year Old Company Founded By Jackson

Petersen & Peterson Company is a 6-year-old company founded by Jackson Peterson and Mary Peterson to exploit metamaterial plasmonic technology to develop and manufacture miniature microwave frequency directional transmitters and receivers for use in mobile Internet and communications applications. The technology, although highly advanced, is relatively inexpensive to implement and their patented manufacturing techniques require little capital in comparison to many electronic fabrication ventures. Because of the low capital requirement, Jackson and Mary have been able to avoid issuing new stock and thus own all the business shares. Because of the explosion in demand for its mobile Internet applications, the company must now access outside equity capital to fund its growth and the couples have decided to take the company public.

Until now, Jackson and Mary have paid themselves reasonable salaries but routinely reinvested all after-tax earnings in the firm, so dividend policy has not been an issue. However, before talking with potential outside investors, they must decide on a dividend policy. Your supervisor at the consulting firm Ernst Young & Associates, which has been retained to help the company prepare for its initial public offering, has asked you to make a presentation to Jackson and Mary in which you plan to review the theories of dividend policy and discuss capital structure decisions.

Paper For Above instruction

Dividend policy is a crucial aspect of corporate financial management, influencing perceptions among investors, the company's market valuation, and its capacity to finance growth. A "distribution policy" refers to the strategic decision regarding how much earnings a company distributes to shareholders in the form of dividends versus how much it retains for reinvestment. Such policies are underpinned by various theories that explain investor preferences and corporate behaviors concerning dividends.

First, the dividend irrelevance theory, rooted in the Modigliani-Miller paradigm, posits that in perfect markets, dividend policy does not impact a firm's value because investors can generate personal dividends by selling shares if necessary or reinvesting dividends. Accordingly, Peterson & Peterson’s decision on dividends might be deemed irrelevant by this theory, assuming perfect market conditions.

The bird-in-the-hand theory suggests that investors prefer dividends over potential capital gains because dividends are certain, whereas future capital appreciation entails risk. Under this perspective, Peterson & Peterson might consider paying regular dividends to attract risk-averse investors, potentially increasing share value.

The tax effect theory emphasizes the role of taxation in shaping dividend preferences, noting that dividends are often taxed more heavily than capital gains. Consequently, investors might prefer companies that retain earnings or pay lower dividends to minimize tax liabilities, influencing Peterson & Peterson’s dividend policy depending on the prevailing tax environment.

Finally, the information content hypothesis, or signaling theory, states that dividend changes convey information about management's confidence in future earnings. An increase in dividends signals positive outlooks, possibly boosting stock prices, while cuts could indicate financial difficulties. For Peterson & Peterson, their dividend policy could serve as a strategic signal to investors about growth prospects and financial health.

The clientele effect describes how different groups of investors prefer different dividend policies based on their specific needs, tax situations, or investment goals. This effect implies that a firm's dividend policy can attract or repel particular investor segments, thereby influencing its overall shareholder base. Peterson & Peterson must consider their target clientele when establishing their dividend policy, especially as they prepare to go public.

Regarding the upcoming capital expansion requiring $10 million, Peterson & Peterson plan to follow a residual dividend policy aligned with their targeted capital structure of 60% debt and 40% equity. Given a net income of $6 million next year and 1 million shares outstanding, the company needs to determine its dividend per share, forecasted payout ratio, and the amount of debt and equity needed for the project.

The residual dividend policy involves financing the expansion first through retained earnings and then distributing any residual profits as dividends. Since the company's target debt-equity ratio is 60:40, the firm must calculate the minimum amount of financing through debt and equity while covering the $10 million investment. Based on the net income, the dividend per share for the next year would be simulated assuming the company allocates funds as per the residual approach.

Implementing the residual policy has several advantages, including aligning dividend payouts with investment opportunities, avoiding unnecessary leverage, and signaling confidence in growth prospects. However, disadvantages include potential dividend volatility, the risk of underpaying dividends during downturns, and possible negative perceptions among investors preferring stable dividends. The signaling and clientele effects play roles here; investors may interpret dividend variability as signals of future earnings or financial stability issues.

Stock repurchases offer another means of returning value to shareholders, with advantages such as providing tax-efficient capital redistribution, boosting share prices through reduced supply, and improving financial ratios. On the downside, disadvantages include the potential for short-term stock price manipulation, reduction of company cash reserves, and potential signaling of lack of profitable reinvestment opportunities.

Boehm Corporation's scenario involves assessing its cost structure and break-even point under initial and proposed plans. Initially, the firm's profits, fixed costs, and sales price allow calculating variable costs per unit and the break-even quantity. The proposed plan introduces additional costs, changes in assets, and price reductions, requiring recalculations of variable costs and breakeven quantities, considering their effect on profitability and operational capacity.

Similarly, Cruz Corporation's data on fixed and variable costs, sales price, and break-even point emphasizes understanding cost-volume-profit relationships. The break-even quantity is calculated by dividing total fixed costs by unit contribution margin. These financial analyses assist firms in strategic planning, cost management, and maximizing profitability.

References

• Berk, J., & DeMarzo, P. (2020). Corporate Finance (5th ed.). Pearson.
• Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2016). Financial Management: Theory & Practice (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Damodaran, A. (2010). The Dark Side of Valuation: Valuing Young, Distressed, and Complex Businesses. FT Press.
• Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.
• Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261–297.
• Lintner, J. (1956). Distribution of Income of Corporations Among Dividends, Retained Earnings, and Taxes. The American Economic Review, 46(2), 97–113.
• Myers, S. C. (1984). The Capital Structure Puzzle. Journal of Finance, 39(3), 575–592.
• Rappaport, A. (1986). Creating Shareholder Value: The New Standard for Business Performance. Free Press.
• Ross, S. A. (1977). The Determination of Financial Structure: The Incentive-Signaling Approach. The Bell Journal of Economics, 8(1), 23–40.
• Wang, J., & Wang, R. (2014). Financial Management. Cengage Learning.