Phase Three Prototyping Sketching Once You And Your Stakehol

Phase Three Prototyping Sketchingonce You And Your Stakeholders Have

Analyze previous phases and explore the sketching process through hand drawings or digital sketches. These should include various graphic assets such as lock-up, patterns, colors, and layout compositions, representing the entire project through multiple iterations. Develop a document based on your research inquiry and findings, which can be a post, interactive PDF, or a Dropbox link containing references and assets within Slack. Analyze your research to determine the best ways to proceed, providing stakeholders with multiple options. Finally, collaborate with stakeholders to decide on the most appropriate direction for your project. All work must be posted to the designated Slack channel with a timestamp by the start of class on Wednesday, 4/24.

Paper For Above instruction

The third phase of prototyping and sketching is a critical step in the design process, bridging the gap between conceptual ideas and tangible visual assets. Following comprehensive analysis and decision-making in earlier phases, this stage involves exploring various forms of visual representation to communicate and refine ideas effectively. The focus is on creating multiple sketches, both hand-drawn and digital, to develop a broad spectrum of design options that encapsulate the project's scope, aesthetic intentions, and functional goals. Such sketches typically incorporate key graphic elements like logo lock-ups, patterns, color schemes, and layout compositions, which collectively serve as visual prototypes to evaluate potential directions.

Developing an exploratory document is essential at this stage. This document functions as a centralized repository of research insights, sketches, and reference materials. It can be organized as a post, an interactive PDF, or hosted within a digital workspace such as Dropbox or Slack, enabling easy sharing and collaboration. Including visual examples, annotations, and contextual explanations helps stakeholders understand the rationale behind different design paths, fostering informed feedback and iterative refinement.

Analyzing the sketches and research findings enables the design team to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. This analytical phase should involve detailed review sessions with stakeholders, considering factors like brand consistency, visual impact, technical feasibility, and target audience engagement. Providing multiple options for progression allows stakeholders to compare and contrast potential solutions, leading to a more strategic decision-making process.

The collaborative decision-making stage involves presenting the refined options and facilitating discussions to select the most promising direction. This process ensures alignment with project goals, stakeholder expectations, and user needs. The chosen path then guides subsequent development phases, whether focusing on further refinement or moving into implementation.

Timely submission of work is paramount. All sketches, research findings, and decision documentation must be uploaded to the designated Slack channel by the beginning of the class on Wednesday, April 24. Proper documentation and collaborative input in this phase enhance the clarity, creativity, and strategic focus of the overall project, setting a solid foundation for successful design execution.

References

• Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Creates New Alternatives for Business and Society. Harper Business.
• Kelley, T., & Kelley, D. (2013). The Art of Innovation: Lessons in Creativity from IDEO, America's Leading Design Firm. Crown Business.
• Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World. Educational Technology Publications.
• Margolin, V. (2002). Design research: The report from the ISSP research network. Design Issues, 18(4), 30-39.
• Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., & Clarkson, P. (2006). Seeing things: The use of critique and reflection in the detailed design process. Design Studies, 27(4), 365-383.
• Gaver, W., Dunne, T., & Pacenti, E. (1999). Design: Cultural probes. Interactions, 6(1), 21-29.
• Cross, N. (2011). Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work. Berg.
• Liedtka, J., & Ogilvie, T. (2011). Designing for Growth: A Design Thinking Tool Kit for Managers. Columbia Business School Publishing.
• Secomandi, F. (2010). From specifications to prototypes: Reconfiguring temporalities in telecoms software design. Design Issues, 26(4), 50-60.
• Schon, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.