Pick 2 Different Cultures That You Belong To Currently

Pick 2 Different Cultures That You Belong To Currently If You Are

Pick 2 different cultures that you belong to currently. If you are having difficulty figuring out if what you are selecting is a culture, refer to the general definition from the first PowerPoint & lecture. As long as the groups you have selected are meeting that general definition, you should be good to go.

For each culture you selected, tell us how the culture tends to align with the differences in culture that were discussed in the lecture (individualist v. collectivist, masculine v. feminine, high-power or low-power distance, high or low context) and why you believe that.

Paper For Above instruction

Cultural identity plays a significant role in shaping individual behavior, perceptions, and interactions within society. For this paper, I will explore two cultures I currently belong to: my national culture, which is American, and my ethnic culture, which is Hispanic. These cultures influence my worldview and social functioning in distinct ways, aligning with various cultural dimensions discussed in intercultural communication theories, such as individualism vs. collectivism, masculinity vs. femininity, power distance, and context communication.

Firstly, the American culture I belong to is predominantly characterized by individualism. According to Hofstede's cultural dimensions, American society emphasizes independence, personal achievement, and individual rights (Hofstede, 2001). This is evident in various aspects of daily life, such as the emphasis on self-reliance, personal aspirations, and the belief that individuals are responsible for their own success or failure. The American culture values autonomy, which influences communication styles—directness, assertiveness, and a focus on individual opinions are commonplace. The low power distance in American culture manifests in informal interactions, equal treatment, and a general skepticism towards authority figures (Hofstede, 2001). Additionally, American society tends to be a low-context culture, relying heavily on explicit verbal communication, directness, and clarity to convey messages efficiently (Hall, 1976).

In contrast, my Hispanic ethnic culture aligns more with collectivism and high-context communication. Hispanic cultures prioritize family ties, community, and social harmony over individual achievement (Triandis, 1995). The collectivist orientation emphasizes interconnectedness, loyalty, and group cohesion, which are central to social interactions and decision-making processes. High-power distance is also a hallmark of Hispanic cultures, where authority figures, elders, and social hierarchies are respected and often expected to be obeyed without question (Hofstede, 2001). Communication tends to be indirect, with a reliance on non-verbal cues, contextual understanding, and subtle expressions to maintain harmony and avoid conflict (Hall, 1976). The feminine dimension, as defined by Hofstede, is also more pronounced in Hispanic cultures, emphasizing nurturing, caring, and quality of life over competitive masculinity (Hofstede, 2001).

These cultural dimensions influence my behavior and perceptions distinctly. In American culture, I tend to prioritize independence and direct communication, which fosters self-confidence and assertiveness. Conversely, in my Hispanic culture, I value relational harmony and indirect communication, which promotes respectful and considerate interactions. Understanding these cultural orientations helps me navigate different social contexts effectively, appreciating the diversity of values and communication styles that influence intercultural interactions. Recognizing the differences in individualist versus collectivist and high- or low-context communication enriches my cultural competence and fosters respectful engagement across cultural boundaries.

In conclusion, my identification with both American and Hispanic cultures demonstrates the multifaceted nature of cultural identity. Each culture's alignment with specific dimensions such as individualism, power distance, and context significantly shapes my worldview and social behaviors. Awareness of these cultural dimensions fosters greater intercultural understanding and helps me adapt my communication style to different audiences, promoting mutual respect and effective interaction.

References

• Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture. Anchor Books.
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Sage.
• Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Westview Press.
• Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (2004). Social axioms: A model and scale. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 413–426). Oxford University Press.
• Kim, Y. Y. (2005). Giving the gift of intercultural communication. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing Intercultural Communication (pp. 141–154). Sage.
• Ting-Toomey, S., & Kurogi, A. (1998). Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An application of politeness theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(2), 187-224.
• Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. (2017). Communicating with strangers: An approach to intercultural communication. Routledge.
• Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.
• Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2001). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. John Benjamins Publishing.
• Hall, E. T. (1989). The Dance of Life: The Values, Skills, and Strategies of Creative Engagement. Anchor Press/Doubleday.