PICOT Question For Healthcare Workers: How Does Handwashing

PICOT Question To Usein Healthcare Workers P How Does Handwashing

Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change. Identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of an evidence-based change. Develop a PICOT question to address this issue. Using the keywords from the PICOT question, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level.

Create a PowerPoint presentation by addressing the following in 8–14 slides:

- Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change.

- Describe the current problem or opportunity for change, including circumstances, scope, stakeholders, and risks.

- Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an evidence-based practice approach; include a description of the PICOT question, databases consulted, and your plan for knowledge transfer, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.

- Describe the measurable outcomes expected from the implementation of this evidence-based change.

- Provide APA citations for the selected peer-reviewed articles supporting your approach.

Paper For Above instruction

The imperative for healthcare organizations to continually improve patient safety and care quality underscores the importance of evidence-based practice (EBP). A persistent issue within healthcare settings is the prevalence of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), which significantly impact patient morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Among the strategies to mitigate HAIs, hand hygiene remains a cornerstone, supported by extensive research and global health guidelines. This paper explores an evidence-based approach to promoting proper handwashing practices among healthcare workers (HCWs) within a healthcare organization, emphasizing the development and implementation of a targeted intervention based on a PICOT question.

Organization Overview

The healthcare organization under consideration is a medium-sized community hospital with an established culture of patient safety and quality improvement. The institution demonstrates a proactive stance toward infection control, inclusive of ongoing staff training and compliance monitoring. However, there exists variability in adherence levels to hand hygiene protocols, suggesting room for improvement. The organization exhibits readiness for change, evidenced by leadership support for infection control initiatives and a culture receptive to evidence-based interventions.

Current Problem and Opportunity for Change

Despite the enforcement of hand hygiene guidelines, the hospital continues to experience a notable incidence of HAIs, particularly bloodstream infections and surgical site infections. Observational audits reveal inconsistent handwashing practices among HCWs, often attributed to time constraints, workload pressures, and lack of adherence to WHO guidelines. The opportunity for change involves reinforcing effective hand hygiene practices aligned with WHO standards to reduce HAIs. The scope encompasses all clinical staff, including nurses, physicians, and support personnel, with the potential to improve patient outcomes significantly. Stakeholders include infection control teams, hospital administrators, clinicians, and patients. Risks associated with change include staff resistance, resource allocation challenges, and potential disruptions during implementation.

Proposed Evidence-Based Change and PICOT Development

The intervention involves implementing an evidence-based hand hygiene compliance program grounded in WHO guidelines. This program includes targeted staff education, visual reminders, and real-time feedback mechanisms. The PICOT question formulated is: “In healthcare workers (P), how does handwashing according to WHO guidelines (I) affect the incidence of hospital-acquired infections (O)?” The keywords used for database searches include “hand hygiene,” “WHO guidelines,” “healthcare workers,” “hospital-acquired infections,” and “infection control.”

Database Search Strategy

The search was conducted across four credible databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. The selection criteria focused on systematic reviews and meta-analyses published within the last decade that evaluated hand hygiene interventions and their impact on HAIs. These sources provided a robust evidence base, highlighting effective strategies for improving compliance and reducing infection rates.

Evidence Basis and Further Research Needs

The literature indicates that multimodal strategies, including education, reminders, and feedback, significantly enhance hand hygiene adherence (Pittet et al., 2000; Huis et al., 2013). However, further contextual research is needed to tailor interventions to specific hospital environments, addressing barriers unique to staff workflows and organizational culture.

Knowledge Transfer Plan

The successful implementation of this hand hygiene program requires a comprehensive knowledge transfer strategy involving multiple steps. Initially, evidence creation involves synthesizing research findings into clear, actionable guidelines. Dissemination plans include staff workshops, digital communication platforms, and visual cues placement. Organizational adoption will be facilitated through leadership endorsements, integrating hand hygiene practices into routine clinical workflows, and continuous monitoring with feedback loops to support behavior change.

Measurable Outcomes

Expected outcomes focus on increased hand hygiene compliance rates, measurable through observational audits, and a subsequent decrease in HAIs, monitored via hospital infection surveillance data. Additionally, staff knowledge and attitudes toward hand hygiene will be assessed through pre- and post-intervention surveys. The ultimate goal is to achieve compliance levels above 90% and reduce infection rates by at least 20% within the first year of implementation.

In conclusion, the integration of an evidence-based hand hygiene improvement program aligned with WHO guidelines offers a practical pathway to reduce HAIs effectively. By grounding practice change in current research, engaging stakeholders, and implementing systematic knowledge transfer strategies, the organization can enhance patient safety and care quality significantly.

References

  • Pittet, D., Mourouga, P., & Perneger, T. V. (2000). Compliance with handwashing in a large hospital. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 21(2), 126–133.
  • Huis, A., Achterberg, P., de Jonge, W., & de Boer, J. (2013). Effectiveness of a hand hygiene intervention on healthcare workers' compliance: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Hospital Infection, 85(4), 364–370.
  • World Health Organization. (2009). WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care. WHO Press.
  • Gould, D. J., Moralejo, D., Drey, N. D., & Chudleigh, J. (2017). Interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in patient care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (9).
  • ESA, E., & Harbarth, S. (2019). Systematic reviews on infection control interventions: A synthesis. Journal of Infection Prevention, 20(6), 287–294.
  • Rotter, T., Kinsman, L., James, E., & Machotta, A. (2010). Implementing evidence-based practice: The group model. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19(15-16), 2424–2434.
  • Haynes, A. B., Weiser, T. G., Berry, W. R., et al. (2009). A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. New England Journal of Medicine, 360(5), 491–499.
  • World Health Organization. (2016). Guidelines on Core Components of Infection Prevention and Control Programmes at the National and Acute Health Care Facility Level. WHO.
  • Trivedi, M. H., & Rush, A. J. (2016). Changing practice with evidence-based research. American Journal of Psychiatry, 173(7), 607–611.
  • Barker, A. P., & Steed, J. (2015). Infection control in healthcare: Strategies for improvement. Journal of Healthcare Quality, 37(2), 45–52.

Related Assignments