Please Attach Turnitin APA Format Sample For This

Please Attach Turnitinapa Formatattached Is A Samplefor This Essay Yo

Please attach Turnitin APA format. Attached is a sample for this essay. You will select one of the sources found during preliminary research on your topic. The source should be substantial enough for detailed discussion and interesting enough to engage the reader.

You will introduce the source by providing the author's name, the title, and the context—such as where you found it, where it was published, and who sponsored it. Then, evaluate the source on two levels: credibility and usefulness. For credibility, assess the source’s authenticity and reliability using specific information about the author or sponsor. For usefulness, analyze the source's purpose, thesis, and how it supports your research claims, including its value in backing your arguments or addressing counter-claims. Conclude with your final assessment of both credibility and usefulness.

The introduction should include:

- The author's name

- The source title

- Context (publication details, origin, sponsorship)

The evaluation should include:

- A judgment on credibility, supported by examples

- A judgment on usefulness, supported by examples

Additionally, include a reflection page answering:

- The types of questions asked when evaluating sources

- How this evaluation practice will assist you in ongoing research

Your submission should be 2-3 pages, double-spaced, with 1-inch margins, in a 12-point readable font. It must be original, appropriate for an academic context, and include your name, course name, date, and the title. Submit as a single file in .doc, .docx, or .pdf format.

Paper For Above instruction

The evaluation of sources is a crucial part of academic research, as it ensures the reliability and relevance of the materials used in developing a well-informed argument. This paper examines a scholarly article on the ethical implications of euthanasia, assessing its credibility and usefulness to a research project focused on medical ethics and policy reform.

The chosen source is an article titled "Euthanasia: An Indian Perspective" by R. Agarwal and B. Balyan, published in the ZENITH International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research in 2019. I found this source through an academic database while researching international perspectives on euthanasia. The journal is peer-reviewed, which adds to its credibility, and the authors are affiliated with reputable Indian medical and legal institutions, adding to the trustworthiness of the article. The journal's sponsorship by academic institutions and its inclusion in scholarly databases further bolster its credibility.

Regarding credibility, I judged the source to be reliable based on the peer-reviewed nature of the publication and the authors’ academic credentials. The article provides detailed references and draws on legal and medical frameworks within India, establishing the authors’ expertise. For example, the authors cite recent Indian legal cases and government policies, demonstrating their engagement with current and credible data. The journal's rigorous review process also suggests that the content has undergone scholarly scrutiny, enhancing its trustworthiness.

As for usefulness, the article’s purpose aligns with my research, which explores different cultural and legal contexts surrounding euthanasia. It offers a comprehensive overview of the ethical debates within India, highlighting cultural nuances that differ from Western perspectives. The article's detailed analysis and legal discussion provide valuable insights that support my arguments about cultural influences on ethical medical practices. It also addresses potential counter-arguments regarding ethical dilemmas, which I can leverage to create a balanced discussion in my research.

In my reflection, I asked questions such as: Does the author have expertise related to the topic? Is the source recent enough to reflect current perspectives? Does the content include references to credible data? These questions helped me determine whether the source was authoritative and relevant. This evaluation process is instrumental in my ongoing research, as it sharpens my critical thinking skills and ensures I rely on the most accurate and relevant information to support my arguments.

References

  • Agarwal, R., & Balyan, B. (2019). Euthanasia: An Indian Perspective. ZENITH International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 9(6). Retrieved from [URL]
  • Brouwer, M., Kaczor, C., Battin, M. P., Maeckelberghe, E., Lantos, J. D., & Verhagen, E. (2018). Should pediatric euthanasia be legalized? Pediatrics, 141(2), e20173861.
  • Vidanapathirana, M. (2017). Non-voluntary passive euthanasia should be legalized in Sri Lanka. Retrieved from [URL]
  • Additional scholarly references supporting the credibility and usefulness of the sources would follow here.

Related Assignments