Please Fill The Attached Self-Assessment Surveys Two And Cal

Please Fill The Attached Self Assessment Surveys Two And Calculate Y

Please fill the attached Self-Assessment Surveys (TWO) and calculate your score according to the instruction after each survey. These are personal assessments, and honesty is advised over concern about external opinions. The first survey assesses decision-making style, and the second evaluates creativity. Each survey includes instructions for scoring and interpretation based on your responses. Carefully follow the scoring instructions provided to determine your scores for each survey, then interpret the results to gain insight into your decision-making approach and creative personality traits.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Self-assessment surveys are valuable tools for gaining insights into personal traits, decision-making styles, and personality characteristics. They serve as instrumental means for individuals to understand their strengths and areas for development within both personal and professional contexts. The two surveys under discussion—one focusing on decision-making tendencies and the other on creativity—offer a comprehensive reflection on how individuals approach choices and problem-solving, which can significantly influence their behaviors and interactions in various settings.

Decision-Making Style Assessment

The first survey aims to evaluate whether an individual is a deliberate decision-maker or tends to make rash decisions. As outlined, respondents rate seven items on a scale from 1 (to a very little extent) to 5 (to a very large extent), describing their decision-making behaviors. The survey includes statements like "I jump into things without thinking" and "I act quickly without thinking," which are reverse-coded to ensure the scoring accurately reflects the deliberate or impulsive nature of decision-making.

The scoring process involves reverse-coding items 1 through 6, where responses are transformed as follows: 1 becomes 5, 2 becomes 4, 3 remains 3, 4 becomes 2, and 5 becomes 1. The sum of all seven items yields a total score ranging from 7 to 35. Higher scores (28 and above) indicate a highly deliberate decision-making style, whereas lower scores (14 and below) suggest rash or impulsive tendencies. Scores between these thresholds reflect a blended decision-making style, neither strictly deliberate nor impulsive.

The significance of this assessment lies in understanding how decision-making influences outcomes and the importance of applying rational models, such as defining problems clearly, evaluating alternatives, and selecting optimal solutions. Personality traits like emotional stability and conscientiousness correlate with a more deliberate decision style, offering avenues for self-improvement through conscious decision-making strategies.

Creativity Assessment

The second survey measures the individual’s level of creativity by assessing characteristics associated with creative thinking. Respondents identify which adjectives accurately describe them from a list of 30 descriptors, including positive traits like "Capable" and "Inventive," and negative traits such as "Commonplace" and "Snobbish." The scoring involves assigning +1 point for descriptors associated with high creativity, such as "Inventive" and "Original," and subtracting 1 point for descriptors that do not embody creative traits.

The total score ranges from -12 to +18, with higher scores indicating a more pronounced creative personality. Creativity, in this context, relates to the ability to connect ideas innovatively and develop unique solutions to problems, which is highly valuable, especially in decision-making roles requiring innovative thinking. Highly creative individuals thrive in environments that provide opportunities for self-expression and novel problem-solving, whereas routine jobs might hinder their job satisfaction.

Research supports that creative traits are linked with certain personality dimensions like openness to experience and extraversion. Recognizing one's creative potential can guide career choices, personal development efforts, and problem-solving approaches.

Conclusion

Both assessments provide valuable insights into personal decision-making preferences and creative capabilities, which significantly influence professional effectiveness and personal growth. By understanding their decision-making style, individuals can adopt strategies that promote thoughtful and rational choices, minimizing rash decisions. Similarly, recognizing their level of creativity can help individuals seek roles and environments that foster their strengths or develop new skills aligned with creative pursuits. Ultimately, these self-assessments serve as reflective tools encouraging continuous self-evaluation and improvement.

References

1. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Westview Press.
2. Deutsch, M. (2011). The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. Jossey-Bass.
3. Goleman, D. (1998). Working with Emotional Intelligence. Bantam Books.
4. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
5. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in Adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory Perspective. Guilford Press.
6. Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and Themes: Research, Development, and Practice. Elsevier Academic Press.
7. Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom, Intelligence, and Creativity Synthesized. Cambridge University Press.
8. Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Personnel Press.
9. Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral Expressions and Biosocial Bases of Sensation Seeking. Cambridge University Press.
10. Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1989). Creativity in the workplace: The dependent effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 633–661.